Summary: Author Michael Wolff alleges that Jeffrey Epstein showed him photos of Donald Trump with topless young women at Epstein’s Palm Beach home. Trump’s campaign has denied the claims, calling Wolff a “disgraced” writer. Wolff also expressed skepticism about Epstein’s death, suggesting it was implausible but also questioning the possibility of a cover-up.

-9 points

Show the peepee tape or sit down. No one gives a shit about, I heard once or I saw something one time…shit or get off the pot

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s very plausible that a millionaire in the 80’s/90’s would have done gross stuff with children, but until there’s evidence I can’t say it happened.

Now his multiple documented cases of serial assault are another situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points
*

Not that I support the guy at all, but you lot really need to stop saying “this is definite” and “it is fact” every time there’s an allegation made about something you don’t like. Not just Trump; anything. Unless you are one, y’all need to save that kind of dumb shit for dumb people, even if you like what you’re hearing.

Take Trump out of it for a second. This is literally a scenario of…

"A guy says a dead guy did a thing that makes another guy look bad, right before a big event involving that other guy "

Could be true. Could be not true. It’s hardly the kind of information that should be landing a half-competent mind onto a decision.

permalink
report
reply
-5 points

“A guy said some dead guy did something he is known for doing, like a lot” has some measure of credibility with the common person on the street.

You must be one of the special ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why, thank you!

You’re pretty special yourself! 🌟

Love this community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Oh wow the passive aggressiveness is palpable. I bet you are the life of the party!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s just confirmation bias. You assume it’s true because it makes sense given other things you know.

If I make up a fact that you are a technology enthusiast, people can assume it’s true, you are using Lemmy, it makes sense. And it might be true, but it doesn’t change the fact I completely made it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It makes it more possible but still proves nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Take Trump out of it for a second

But then it becomes a completely different scenario.

Trump has repeatedly admitted to molesting women, he’s bragged about forcing his way into women’s locker rooms, he joked openly and without judgement of epstein’s love of kids, he has scores of sexual assault allegations, he has enough money and clout to cover up his rapes and he’s been convicted of illegally covering up legal but embarrassing sexual encounters.

Trump has definitely molested children, it is a fact. It’s literally beyond a shadow of a doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

What you’re after is news pieces that confirm your position. Dangerous.

then it becomes a completely different scenario.

No. No it does not.

At the end of the day…

A guy is saying a dead guy did a thing that makes another guy look bad, right before a big event involving that other guy.

Literally, this is “Trust me, bro.”

Be it Trump, Elmo, or a box of Skittles, this preface does not change. Acknowledge that first, then you can go start conversations about Trump molestations as much as you like.

Don’t be like a red hatter and get caught in echo chambers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

that affirm your position.

I’m looking for news that affirms reality. Trump’s public record words and actions already left no doubt that he’s molested children. This writer’s credible but unsourced account is just to remind people that trump has molested children, something that most people realize from trump’s words, actions, associates attitude.

When something looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, hangs out with ducks, eats bread at the park, and admits in public and private to being a duck - it’s unreasonable to argue that we can’t assume it’s a duck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Duur let’s remove the statement from the context to prove I am not afraid to use logic to defend a pedophile. You do understand how fucking tone death this is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You didn’t seem to understand that workout proof we can’t accuse trump, even tho he is a horrible piece of shit that deserves to rot in jail. As much as I’d love to see him get arrested and imprisoned, we cannot simply take someone’s word that someone else did those horrible things, otherwise trump would have already made all of his enemies go to jail with his stupid bullshit accusations. I also think that trump very very likely did those things, but for the justice system we need proof, and someone saying that someone else did something isn’t proof, it’s hearsay and not taken as evidence by law

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Oh sure its the law, logic, or whatever fucked up reason you have in your head. I just see a pedophile defender. Pick a different hill unless, you know, birds of a feather…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you for being a wise thoughtful person, im canadian so it doesn’t matter how I feel, just wanted tonsay it’s nice to see some civility here

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Well, I’ll just add that even if this is true it will sway nobody.

Trump is a rapist caught on tape bragging about how easy it is to assault women. Very few Trump supporters are unaware of this fact and yet that are still Trump supporters.

That he’s assaulted women simply isn’t newsworthy for his fascist followers. He’s hurting the right people and that’s all that matters to them.

Sadly, about the only thing he could do to lose support would be to insult his followers or the USA. They’ll forgive him for pretty much anything else, including rape and murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not only caught on tape, he was found civilly liable for raping E. Jean Carrol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No half competent mind is voting for trump unless they are in the top .01%

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

So fucking what? I’m sure lots of guys have had half naked women sitting on their lap at one point during their life.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

As much as I dislike trump I have to say most men I know have been to a strip club and this isn’t something significant without more to the story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Like the fact that it was Jeffrey Epstein with the pictures, you great minds?

If you want to doubt the base veracity, that’s a reasonable doubt. To ask why it would matter with these two individuals is actually embarrassing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But its just a picture of trump with top less woman. Not illegal. What we need is trump doing something illegal and I’m pretty sure all the went up in flames on that island he owned less than 24 hours after he was dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
The Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Daily Beast:

Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-showed-pics-of-donald-trump-with-topless-young-women-claims-author-michael-wolff/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
109 points

Trump has definitely molested children. He’s a serial rapist whose hang-out buddies are some of the world’s most prominent pedophiles.

Even if trump wasn’t specifically asking for children, there’s no way he’s checking IDs before he sexually assaults victims of trafficking.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

He specifically talked about walking into locker rooms…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Dressing rooms.

The locker rooms were where he went to brag about the raping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right, it’s so hard keeping the details straight…

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 180K

    Comments