140 points

Why doesn’t it read “Far Right Extremist, White Nationalist, Christofacist, Terror Group ‘MAGA’ Reaking Havic Around The U.S.”

Call a duck a duck

permalink
report
reply
-20 points
*

The person who set the fires said they wanted to be arrested, and it wasn’t politically motivated. Unless they give evidence to the contrary, there’s no reason to not believe them, especially since they had a prior arrest warrant outstanding for something unrelated.

Edit: Wow, lot of astroturfing going on here, or people who didn’t read the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

No reason not to believe the person who “wants to be arrested” and is lighting fires in public spaces?

Who are you trying to convince?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

He was saying there’s reason to believe they thought this would be a high profile, non-violent action that would get them attention as well as arrested. I.e., that the arrest and attention were the primary motivations moreso than a political one. It was just a standard, blue USPS post box, not a specific county ballot box (those actually have fire suppression for this reason), so it seems reasonable that this person is just an unstable idiot, not a politically motivated unstable idiot.

He was previously arrested for just showing up to a work site, assumed homeless, and sitting there, and then trying to take an officers gun “because he ‘wanted it’ and ‘because it’s cool.’” He was then restrained with duct tape. Lol

Who knows, it’s dumb and he was arrested though, which is good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s from the article dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

If he has a warrant out and wanted to be arrested… Why wouldn’t he just walk into a police station?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

People who want to be arrested aren’t necessarily the sharpest tool in the shed…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That would make sense. Unfortunately, I’ve known enough contrarian weirdos to see how that type of logic might make more sense (to them).

“Why are you stressing about this? Can’t you just take those old clothes to Goodwill or throw them away?”

“Well, first I need to buy 30 cases of Coke and then - to make room in the car - I need to visit the park back in Indiana to scatter our dog’s ashes.”

Knowing that it’s probably just illogical all the way down, I could believe either scenario.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Most people have no idea they have a warrant out until they have an interaction with the police. Most warrants aren’t for issues serious enough to send an officer to pick someone up. Not all warrants are for violent offenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m sure the guy wasn’t rocking a full set of marbles if this is what he thought passes for a good idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you’re seeking a felony or many, no better way than to do something to the USPS. Glad the damage was minimal to the ballots and that this person maybe can get the help they need and seemingly were screaming for internally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

This is why I took my mail in ballot to the post office instead of trusting a mailbox or my conservative mailman.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I did so and I’m checking my county’s ballot tracker like a hawk to make sure it registers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I got the email saying they received mine yesterday.

Still double checked the website because it could have been a Republican trick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Ah yes, the stable democracy of a first world country…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The people who are most concerned about voter fraud are the ones committing voter fraud. Go figure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is the way

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I dropped mine in the county’s drop box so I don’t have to risk letting USPS destroy it or “lose” it. Make sure you follow up to verify that your ballot was received AND accepted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Headline should be something along the lines of “Fascists try to meddle with the election”

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Not trying, already did. When Trump loses, he will use all of this as a reason for congress to appoint him president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Here comes the terrorism

permalink
report
reply
44 points

If there’s one branch of law enforcement you don’t want to fuck with it’s the US Postal Inspection Service. This person is about to do some time. They do not fuck around with the mail.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Don’t piss off the PIS!

They don’t have their own special agents or something anymore right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The USPS? Yes, they have agents and they are armed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wow what could I have been remembering…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They have their own police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Just ask the Post Master General

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Louis DeJoy is a fucking disgrace, for real.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think DeJoy has pulled back their enforcement somewhat - to the point that violence against mail-carriers has had a HUGE spike. Hopefully this is still covered though.

Oh, and fire that fucker DeJoy, too…

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 214K

    Comments