168 points

They spent those 50 years convincing half the voting population that evidence doesn’t matter, unfortunately.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Good old degradation of public school standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Combined with 24 hour propaganda on “news” nwtworks

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Public school funding can’t be used to fuel the military industrial complex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not without a little imagination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
145 points

permalink
report
reply
92 points

Oh no … it did work … it worked spectacularly … for the top wealthiest people in the world

They figured out that they could cut the amount of taxes they had to pay, collect even more wealth for themselves and convince everyone around them and all the poor people out there like you and me that it was all perfectly acceptable, and sensible and that we should all keep electing government officials to keep that system going while we all paid for it. The wealthiest figured out how they could keep their money and make us all pay for it. And they did it for 50 years. And they’re still doing it.

I think it worked fantastic … for them.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

We just need to be more patient and tax-cut the wealthy even harder. Then it’ll properly start to trickle. Just a little longer

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I think I can feel it. It’s warm. And… smells a bit like asparagus?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I agree … but the problem is … it took 50 years for us to get to this point and it will probably take 50 years or longer to get it back to a manageable level again. That is, if we take 50 years of consistently pushing back against the wealthy in the same way that the wealthy have been pressing the poor for the past 50 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Lina Khan (in the US) is taking those first steps. Harris better keep her in place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

How about we try some trickle up economics for a while? That’s where you give money to people who actually need it, and let businesses compete for them as customers, and the revenue will trickle up to successful companies.

Might as well, right?

permalink
report
reply
21 points

We did. Brought to you by Roosevelt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

(Offer not available to black people)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The biggest criticism is hilarious. They say poor people don’t use the money responsibly. It just passes right through their hands. They neglect to mention that’s because they’re buying needed goods and services and that money trickles up far more reliably than money trickles down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It just passes right through their hands

Plus a general illiteracy for economics where that should be the goal because the economy grows with money spent, not money saved

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My personal theory is they’re also trying to normalize the money not moving into the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s almost like you can have a monetary system and trade without all the crony klepto bullshit of the current system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Yeah, no shit…

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments