171 points

There’s no such thing as “anonymous” texts — just texts the government can’t be bothered to trace back to their origin.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Well you can send people “SMS” messages from an email system; if you know who the carrier on that number is. usually it’s [the phone number]@[their service].

it’s not hard to find what the domain name for the email transfer service is, and who owns which cell phone, and they can just buy a list of phone numbers that ping off college cells under specific circumstances that would indicate they’re college students.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

This guy right here officer ^

permalink
report
parent
reply

What, he works in marketing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I receive spam texts from bullshit emails all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yup.

And you can have an email server in some Latin American country who doesn’t give a fuck (and why should they?) and basically create a new domain when ever you get shut down for spammy spam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

There was the one case with the scammers in the UK using a homemade cell tower to essentially send out phishing texts directly to cell phones in an area, completely bypassing the phone company. It seems like this scare texts scenario would fit that kind of tech even better, as you only need to send out a message once to a large amount of people and you don’t need to collect information in response like in a phishing scenario.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

WHO!? Who could POSSIBLY be behind such a text!?!? It is beyond fathoming. There certainly isn’t a correlation between education and voting lines, or else one party would surely be trying to destroy the education system and bring religion back into schools!

Anonymous my ass.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Also, political intimidation and threats of violence are terrorism, and these people should be tried as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman. Guaranteed they’re behind this.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Almost certainly. How many times have they been busted for this now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I trust that our college students are smart enough to see through this bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I wouldn’t have 20 years ago when I was in college. Somehow I don’t think it’s gotten better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Really? You would trust a random text telling you that you will go to prison for participating in a cornerstone of our democracy? The internet existed 20 years ago… You really wouldn’t have thought to double check?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You also have to consider a twenty year old and just running with the possibility. They don’t care if it’s necessarily true. They don’t have enough experience to know it’s probably not true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

20 years ago, you wouldn’t have expected to have social media / internet help you determine whether a threat was real.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We had real news back then though, and many of us watched it. We knew Bush was a dangerous moron who wanted wars. And we knew Nader was a spoiler, but enough of my idiot classmates still voted against Gore. I was dumbfounded when they would admit it with a shrug. So much so that it has still stuck with me to this day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I’m gonna vote even harder

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Fill in all the circle.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 150K

    Comments