1 point
*

Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke “trash.”

That is how it is done. Unlike Harris. Who went on a parade with Liz Cheney, and praised Dick Cheney for his work after they endorsed her.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You do know that you need the other party’s voters to jump ship to win the election, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Dems already have the other party’s candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You can also appeal to the disaffected Leftists jumping ship, or the non-voters. You don’t need to campaign to the right of your predecessor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

So why did Jill Stein reject David Duke’s endorsement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What? That’s never been the case in any election. The parties only get candidates to ~40% or so. And turnout is far more impactful than people crossing party lines.

Even under the (completely unreal) philosophy that turnout is fixed and that every single voter has a default party, that still wouldn’t mean you need the other party’s voters. One of the parties will have >50%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Thank you!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
176 points

Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Who are you referring to? I’m debating some “Harris needs to earn my vote. So it’s her fault if Trump wins.” idiots right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hmm. I can think of someone who was recently accused of running two accounts. Something like bad mythical figure name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Maybe a play on “omnipresent zealot”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve had a tag on the user I think you’re referencing for a minute now. It’s quite helpful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

=)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points
*

Who is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points
*

Because it’s already been posted here and this community doesn’t allow duplicate posts. It’s also been posted in Politics Unfiltered.

I don’t know what user you’re referring to, but I’ve commented in this thread. And I posted another article referring to David Duke and Jill Stein. https://lemmy.world/post/20893592

I thought it was interesting, so I posted it. Thank you! :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Ah so you were late to /c/politics. Well I suppose we all have busy days at work sometimes. You’ll get ‘em next time champ.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points
*

Wait, I thought Lemmy was under the impression that I post every 17 minutes, 24 hours a day?! And that I’m a team of people. Oh AND that I’m a bot.

So if all that’s true, how was I having a “busy” day at work?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-47 points

Right?! Thanks, friend! :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Thanks! :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
15 points

It’s almost like people argue in bad faith on the internet. Fancy that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points
*

Or some people just don’t agree with the echo chamber. Just because they don’t change their minds and vote differently than others, doesn’t mean it’s in bad faith. Thanks! :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

True, some people agree with former KGB agents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Omg 😱 you might be onto something!

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I don’t know about you, but I’m saving this post for future citations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Solid plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

and be sure to save this too:

Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke “trash.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

how does this article impact anyone’s support for a 3rd party?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Centrists haven’t been this happy about an endorsement since Cheney-senpai noticed them.

permalink
report
reply
-25 points

Harris is openly embracing Dick Cheney endorsements, lol. It is nothing for Jill to reject it. This is also the same crowd that “Biden has changed for his segregationist” lmao.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

I think you’re misunderstanding the Cheney’s support.

Dick and Liz (and Bush and others) aren’t supporting Harris because she aligns with them or they like her. They’re doing it because trump is so heinous, literally anything is better than a second trump term.

They don’t want Harris; they’ve just reached the conclusion trump will destroy the GOP. And they’re right.

As Lindsay Graham said in 2016:

If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed…and we will deserve it.

This is self-preservation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

I don’t give af what their reasons are Dick Cheney is one of the worst people on the planet. It is easy not to stand by him. But I’m fine with voting third party this point. I don’t want to be allies with liberals who will throw anyone under the bus to retain comfort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Nobody is ‘standing by him’. Hitler liked dogs. Am I supposed to hate dogs because Hitler ‘stood by’ them?

I couldn’t give less of a fuck who the Cheneys support. Their opinions don’t factor into my choices at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Donald Trump thanks you for your support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“I don’t like that one of the worst people in the world is advocating for a candidate, and I’m not going tk vote for that candidate because of this- even though *the other candidates is objectively far worse than the guy I hate”

Is how I interpret that.

Throw your vote away if you want. Just don’t whine here when trump wins because of you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That explains why they support her, it doesn’t explain why Harris is bragging about that endorsement and campaigning with him. Especially when her main message is saving democracy and he’s the guy that actually stole an election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Especially when her main message is saving democracy

This is exactly the reason. Because saving democracy right now means getting every possible vote, and the Cheneys can sway some old, Reagan/Bush republicans who reflexively vote R without really paying attention. If even the Cheneys support Harris, they might take notice. It’s an enemy-of-my-enemy situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t think Bush weighed in this election season, did he? I was pretty sure he sat this one out so far as endorsements and public statements of support go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You’re right, I misremembered an article I read last month:

# 200 aides of former Republicans, including both Bush presidents, endorse Kamala Harris

Bush’s lack of endorsement makes him somehow worse than he already was, in light of practically everyone else coming out against trump, and the bar is so low, Satan is tripping over it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Yep!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

cheney is evil but he doesn’t support the kkk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Not quite the same impact as endorsements from war criminals.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

True, but not many people have lead what used to be the largest terrorist organization in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

David Duke ran the Portland Police Bureau!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The KKK was the largest terrorist organization in the US by any standard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 151K

    Comments