119 points

In my head this is a retribution for financing hackers that attacked Internet Archive and nobody can convince me otherwise

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Nintendo was responsible for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points
*

It’s like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit… And, uh… You know, you’ll, uh… You know what I mean.

The Dude

„Who benefits the most” from attacking Internet Archive? Big copyright holders whose content was distributed via Internet Archive. The reason given by the group claiming responsibility is so silly I don’t believe it.

[edit] I’ll add to this comment so that I don’t have to reply to everyone specifically.

I don’t believe that if you wanted to attack USA (as people claiming responsibility did) you’d attack it in a way that benefits big corporations most. It sounds like a flimsy distraction from true perpetrators.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You can believe what you want, but there’s absolutely no way you would be correct. Any large company sponsoring a cyber attack, if caught, would be nailed to the wall and made an example of. The extreme risks are simply not worth the comparatively small reward of reducing a tiny fraction of piracy.

A more realistic and reasonable avenue would have been to sponsor the companies going after IA for copyright infringement as a result of them loaning out unlimited digital copies of books without DRM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For those curious, this account on Xitter claimed responsibility. Their stated reasons are indeed ridiculous, but I don’t at all have a hard time believing that people can be that misguided.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This is a conspiracy theory I’m completely behind. With all the moves Nintendo has made recently this was the first thing I thought when Internet Archive was compromised

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Can I already get my hopes up for some PC ports?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Probably not, that’d be piracy, and I’m sure that Nintendo will sue them to hell. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Tor

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Tor is only as safe and as secure as the person using it.

Most people think just installing Tor and running protects them and their identity. Most don’t even look at things like DNS leaks or think a VPN plus Tor helps, that being said. Tor and Mullvad are probably as private and as secure as you can get by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@Dremor@lemmy.world and @simple@lemm.ee.

I’m surely talking out of my rear-end, but isn’t possible for an eventual developer to go the way of the SM64 port: having to provide a rom in order to get the assets? As far as I know, those responsible of said port haven’t been bothered by Nintendo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Technically yes but I doubt anyone would go through the effort only to be sued into oblivion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are a lot of fangames that contain regions and their Pokemon from original games, with some enhancements. You could try these.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Good. Fuck them. Steal everything of value from them.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s beta builds of old games. It’s only valuable to super fans who wanted to see what could have been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are leaks of 3 future games also. Gen 10, 11 and a MMO

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I thought the leaker saw those and decided to not reveal too many details other than they exist? There’s a sentence about it in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
224 points

Terabytes of the same game, just in different colors.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Sort of. The same game, over and over, each time in a different colour, each time with a higher pixel density, each time a little bit worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Which is exactly why I stopped playing after Gen 2, which was the peak of the series IMO. If you want to see everything the series has to offer, just play Gold/Silver (or their remakes on the DS). No reason to waste time and money on any other Pokémon game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Gen 4 was peak IMO, both the new Pokemon were excellent as well as the best remakes ever made. Gen 4 has Platinum and HeartGold SoulSilver which are the best games in the series.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Radical Red and Polished Crystal are peak, in my opinion. I can’t go back to the lack of special/physical split, it’s just awful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I really liked Prism. And I don’t know, Radical Red just played different from how I like my single player pokemon experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Have you tried Unbound?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pokemon Black/White 1 & 2 are as close to that as you want. Great story, amazing songs that i still hum to this day, and the designs are as solid as Gen 1 and 2.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments