92 points

Trump, Trump, Trump. “All these things Trump could do…”

How about, Biden could have Trump assassinated as a political rival.
Done and done.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Democrats won’t, they’re too busy “taking the high road”. And by “high road” I mean “bribe big enough to live comfortably in Thailand for the rest of their lives”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To paraphrase and increase the accuracy of a deeply wrongheaded (imo) political slogan:

When they go low, we go die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Biden could assassinate every billionaire in the country overnight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why not order the NSA to hack their bank accounts and just take the money?

Everyone is going straight to assassinations, but there’s a whole lot that this immunity could accomplish before killing is needed.

None of it will happen with a democratic president, because of norms that they apparently haven’t realized mean fuck all to the other side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The president couldn’t be charged for taking the billionaires’ money but the money could still be returned. An assassination can’t be undone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Yeah turn their godlike cult figurehead into a martyr. Let’s see how that works out in the long run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They already are treating him like a martyr. It would just be follow through at this point

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

That would instantly start a civil war, and if you’re keeping track, we don’t have any/as many guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Speak for yourself, and if you don’t, you should really look into buying them. We’re not heading towards a happy place in this country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or know some gun nuts and where they keep em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Who doesn’t have guns?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Around 66% of American Households don’t have a gun.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/264932/percentage-americans-own-guns.aspx

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That’s a personal problem. The people paying attention and most at risk have been arming themselves since 2015. LGBTQ, Black, and Hispanic gun ownership are the fastest rising ones. Trailing them is more white people, whos rate of gun ownership is also rising, just slower. Eveyones been buying more guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

I don’t own guns. I own glass bottles. They are far more effective weapons when wielded correctly. A single glass bottle can do more damage than a thousand bullets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is like Charlie with his sword talking to Mac with his gun

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t own glass bottles. I own garden gnomes. They are far more effective weapons when wielded correctly. A single garden gnome can do more damage than a thousand glass bottles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Wow, so many down votes. Either people don’t understand or they are against historically useful anarchic ordinance. Seriously people, if we have any hope of dealing with these problems we need to take some cues from some Ukrainian grandmothers circa 2 to 3 years ago regarding the proper and artful application of glass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

*will

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Well, the E-mail lady did warn us…

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

Are we really still talking about how Clinton being one of the least popular politicians to run for president took it upon herself to tank a must win election? Really? I need this talking point to find its place in a grave. This is stupid.

Everyone knew Trump was a trainwreck. Clinton was so unpopular that people stayed home. She snubbed key states against campaign advice. She sucks. And she lost democracy for the US. We didn’t owe Clinton a vote. Clinton needed people to vote for her. She didn’t do enough to earn the votes. I voted for her begrudgingly. But Democrats turned their knives on Bernie harder than they did against Trump. And it turned a lot of people off from voting. At least Biden did some semblance of appeasement for the left populist wing of the Democrats in the first election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

It was a pretty simple statement, I think. Certainly not worth the two paragraphs of dribble you delivered in response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-60 points
*

If she’s so concerned, she should resign. Let Biden nominate her replacement.

By staying on, she’s basically signalling she doesn’t care about the court going 7-2 after she drops dead during Trump’s second term. No lessons learned from the RBG fiasco. What’s the point of writing these long eloquent dissents that never end up swaying anything?

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

As i recall either Manchin or Sinena already came out and said the would not approve a justice in an election year. Having her resign now will be a repeat of the Garland nomination

Edut: it was Manchin https://www.reuters.com/world/us/manchin-would-not-back-supreme-court-confirmation-right-before-2024-election-2022-02-15/

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Unless it’s one nominated by a Republican president, of course

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Yes, the best time for her to step down would have been earlier (same issue with Biden dropping out). But the second best time is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Bro, Trump’s just going to kill her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She should resign, as one of the few level headed justices on SCOTUS? What kind of logic is that? You know she’s not a conservative justice, right? Like… I can’t think of any other reason you’d think this is a good idea, and during an election year no less. I see way less trolling on Lemmy than I did on reddit, but I’d like to believe this is trolling and not the actual opinion of a legitimate American voter.

She should keep fighting the good fight while we hope for a couple of justices to die or be impeached soon so we can fix the balance of SCOTUS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You haven’t put any thought into the situation.

SC justices are appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate. Both are currently held by the democrats, the latter narrowly. Both are likely to flip next year. Sotomayor is over 70, diabetic, and travels with a medic.

If she wanted to do the right thing for the causes she believes in, she should have resigned during the past one or two years. Biden would have been able to replace her with a younger, equally liberal justice. But she didn’t and probably won’t, so if she dies anytime in the next 4 years (or 8 years if the Rs win the presidential election after that) then the court goes 7-2 and will remain conservative-dominated for decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not sure anybody would make that call at her age. And to be clear, because you’re trying to infer that she is older than she is by calling her “over 70”, she’s 7 days past her 70th birthday; I’m not sure anyone would regard that as over 70, just 70. So at what point in her mid 60s was she supposed to decide “uh oh, I’m going to die soon”, exactly?

And there are so many uncertainties when a replacing a SCOTUS justice that come in to play, especially with one side who will do anything to install their totalitarian regime and the otherside is on their high horse getting their legs sliced to bits because they were too righteous to jump off for the battle - why kick that beehive before it’s ACTUALLY necessary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What’s the point of writing any dissent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

So they save face

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

To look virtuous without contributing anything substantive towards your cause.

At this point, the one substantive thing Sotomayor can do is resign and make way for an ideologically aligned replacement. And this, she doesn’t do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And what would her replacement be able to do differently?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

you are truly a moron. I pity the people in your life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Conservatives would never confirm a new justice under Biden or any non-conservative president. There will never be bipartisan confirmations again in our lifetimes. The next justices will be forced through by whichever side has such power.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments