KEY POINTS

  • The Department of Justice late Tuesday indicated that it was considering a possible breakup of Google as an antitrust remedy.
  • The DOJ said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search.”
  • The judge has yet to decide on the remedies, and Google will likely appeal, drawing out the process potentially for years.
-25 points

“considering” is entirely the problem with this conservative democrat president

permalink
report
reply
27 points

There are the Trump cases that are objectively easy to prosecute (especially the stolen document case), since the law is clear and no good lawyer wants to represent Trump. Here the DOJ has clearly been dragging his feet for reasons that are unrelated to the legal system.

Then there are these antitrust cases that are objectively EXTREMELY complex, and where the legal arguments have to be very carefully constructed to withstand a challenge from the best lawyers money can buy. Complain about the former, not the latter

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

4 years to bring a slam dunk case. It’s as if they weren’t trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah especially when you consider that this “conservative democrat president” is the one who put Lina Khan at the head of the FTC and Merrick Garland at the head of the DOJ, and is why for one of the few times In my life I’m seeing news articles about people in the government doing their fucking job of protecting the American people from American Corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I thought the stolen documents case WAS being prosecuted? By Jack Smith?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Only considering*? :/

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Why not shoot for the moon with only 3 months left?

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I have no doubt Alphabet Google would try to delay any breakup as long as physically possible, but this would be a huge win against big tech if it went ahead. It’d probably be quite the win for public privacy as well, as it’d decouple these widely used platforms from Google.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Google has enough money to buy scotus though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

Neat!

Do Amazon and Facebook too.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

And then everything too big to fail! Too big to fail = too big.

It’s not like the knowledgeable people, or systems/infrastructure all disappear if a business fails. Business is basically a bunch instructions for people moving a bunch of shit around for money. Literally nothing about it is so unique it cannot be reproduced.

And then also Physically split up Elon, billionaires need to learn how to exist in a society of laws and consequences instead of above it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Physically split up Elon

Draw and quarter the rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Lets call back to classics and do it to AT&T again, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

AT&T De-reunion Tour

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T every few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T all companies every few years.

Given capitalisms inevitable march towards monopoly, this would just be good business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why not every large company, just for good measure?

Make more than x, or pay your CEO more than y% more than the rest of the employees? Instant breakup!

Society might actually be good!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

AT&T classic or new AT&T (Verizon, sprint/t-mobile)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How about we nationalize all three instead, start operating them for the public good?

^^^I ^^^know ^^^this ^^^dream ^^^is ^^^impossible

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Also break up ISPs. I have the local monopoly and 4 red herrings providers allowed to operate to give the illusion of competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And force fiber installation. I have plenty of fiber in my area… it just stops at the boundary of every apartment complex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Oh my gosh.
My town advertised fiber rollout with a completion by the end of 2023.

I asked about any projects for my street because it’s no longer 2023 and the clerks couldn’t find any road permits for running it through the conduit

I live in a community of rental homes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My area would get reasonable fiber coverage by the time we figure out how to stream cat videos over entangled particles to a phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nationalize ISPs. Internet access is a utility, no one should be profiting off of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments