Looks like there’s some lying going on, lol

6 points

As weird as it seems, it may partly be external pressure.

My precise height is 5’11 and a half.

Each times it comes up in conversation, I tend to say I am 5’11, but people close to me insist I am 6’.

I feel like nobody would insist if I was 5’10 and a half that I am 5’11, it’s just the magic 6’ number that make people weird.

permalink
report
reply

I only ever get measured without shoes on at the doctor these days. I’ve been 6’6’’ since I was 16 or so. My shoes would add probably another inch.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I wonder if that’s what happened to me …… I’ve been 6’2” or 6’2.5” for my entire adult life, but there was at least one time the doctors office measured me at 6’3”, maybe I had shoes on. I have to admit to using that some of the time even though it’s an outlying data point

Part of it is that my ex was exactly a foot shorter. At some point she started calling herself 5’3” so I had to continue being a foot taller than that

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As someone closer to 6’1" usually, I just go with 6’ because it’s easier. It’s funny that both ends of 6’ seem to just report 6’. The shorter side seems more likely to do this, obviously, but I think there’s a lot of people like me who just choose the slightly easier option too. I’d be curious if you got the same anomaly if multiple foot markers were within the majority of the normal distribution.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Just use centimeters, Jesus.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I remember a post by OKCupid noticing the same phenomenon at 179 cm countries that use metric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What about the apostles?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just using this data to show how stupidly wealth is currently distributed in the country assuming 5’11" or 1.8 meters average if we converted this into 2022 wealth values with average income of 61,136, top 1% as 785,968 (12.9x), and 0.1% 2.8 million (458x) the top 1% height would be 23.22 meters and 0.1% would be 824.4 meters tall.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I’m pretty high and I can’t make an ounce of sense of what you’re on about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is a nicely symmetric bell curve but a similar wealth distribution graph will show a miles long tail

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Naturally occurring normal numeric distributions will tend towards a bell shape, or curve, as you acquire observations. Artificial distributions like income will follow a different curve that is sometimes difficult to visualize especially when the differences are measured in millions or billions. It’s easier to visualize the differences in artificial distributions if you use a natural distribution as a familiar basis.

Tl;Dr Do you think Paul Bunyan and Paul Blart are related?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Only if they both know who took Karl

permalink
report
parent
reply

Data is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

Community stats

  • 346

    Monthly active users

  • 93

    Posts

  • 1.5K

    Comments