49 points

Wow actual infrastructure spending? Awesome!

permalink
report
reply
21 points

And it isn’t even infrastructure week!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It is now!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Did you sleep through the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes? Am I not allowed to be excited about this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry we already have infrastructure at home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The projects will enable nearly 1,000 miles of new electric transmission development and 7,100 megawatts of new capacity in Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas.

So it’s a bailout

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s infrastructure week!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I understand why you would be cynical but don’t understand at all how you came to that conclusion

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s paying to rebuild infrastructure where the state government has been neglecting. I’m sure part of it will be to rebuild what’s been destroyed by the hurricane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

So bailing out who? Sounds like they’re bailing out the people by building a more resilient energy grid, which some might instead define as an investment in the future

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s paying to rebuild infrastructure where the state government has been neglecting.

Besides Texas, none of those states listed are population dense or otherwise rich. In fact the low population density may require the cost per subscriber to be significantly higher because more infrastructure is required to bring service to fewer people. This is a perfect example of good federal government spending.

Is your preference that if these regions can’t afford to build/maintain this infrastructure they should go without?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not a swing state in that list. Don’t they know you only help those that get you elected??

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

the fact that texas’ jank ass disconnected grid is getting a dime of federal money is frustrating. they want their own grid, they can have it. if they want federal dollars to fix what they broke then they should be forced to connect and follow the same rules as everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think a small portion of Texas is connected to the federal grid. Maybe this would extend that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There was an article posted today on /c/texas (Lemmy World, I think) about them actually connecting to the national grid.

I guess there actually was a cold day in hell…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

it does appear that ERCOT finally saw the writing on the wall. i’m not opposed to giving texas money for their grid if it means they will be subjected to the same federal oversight that occurs elsewhere. https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-harris-administration-invests-15-billion-bolster-nations-electricity-grid-and-0

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It doesn’t really seem like a bailout.

The packaging says reliability, but the description within the article looks less like neighborhood reliability, and more like national grid reliability.

Specifically, those grid interconnections - the Cimarron Link, Southern Spirit, and Southline. Cimarron will connect Texas to massive wind farms in Oklahoma - power that isn’t going anywhere. It’ll connect Texas to Mississippi (Southern Spirit), and Texas to Tucson. I don’t know about the Mississippi connection, but Tucson is connected to Hoover Dam, which means that losses from transmission be damned, once this is all done, power from (at least) Oklahoma can be sent to LA the next time Lake Meade dries up, with the possibility of power from the east coast finding its way to the west, and vice versa.

As other commenters pointed out, Texas already has some of the least expensive energy in the country, so adding capacity doesn’t make a lot of sense. And transmission lines only adds reliability in the sense that there’s more supply, but most of their failures are not supply related. My understanding of the adding capacity part is just a dovetail into adding solar capacity to states with a lot of land that will become increasingly useless for farming as the climate changes. It just so happens that Biden is trying to create a U.S.-based solar panel and battery production industry. Not a bad strategy to throw cash into generating/subsidizing demand at the same time as we start adding tariffs to imports of those products. (It’s not like, a great strategy, either - because unless the U.S. is willing to subsidize their market longer than China is willing to subsidize theirs, then the U.S. will not really ever have a competitive industry, but I guess if they view it as a matter of national security, then it doesn’t matter that it doesn’t make sense.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

$1.5 billion won’t actually get you a whole lot.

Better than nothing though. Considering utilities can do this as cap projects, I feel like this money is better spent on bridges/roads.

Who is going to own the infrastructure when it is complete? Outside of like three main utilities, there are no state owned utilities. (Tennessee, Bonneville, and LCRA, I believe).

permalink
report
reply
3 points

There’s several municipally owned ones too. Like Silicon Valley Power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How about we stop handing out tax money to private corporations.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

not for the nimrods in texas though…EDIT: holy shit, i stand corrected

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments