When Trump was president, Republicans fought to repeal the health insurance program.

Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance claimed Tuesday night — in contradiction of history — that his running mate, former President Donald Trump, “salvaged Obamacare,” the health insurance program that Trump tried to kill.

During the vice presidential debate on CBS against Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Vance, a senator from Ohio, echoed Trump’s own recent revisionism. But the assertion also served to remind voters that Democrats ultimately won the yearslong political fight over expanding access to health insurance: The Republican ticket no longer wants to repeal the 2010 law.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

98 points
*

Didn’t John McCain famously save it by breaking off to vote with Dems against Trumps wishes?

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Yup. Plus Trump tried to repeal it on day one through executive order because he doesn’t know how anything works.

Walz pointed out both of these last night.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump was just stress-testing it, see, he helped!

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah. And then MAGA threatened to kill him for it afterwards. Totally normal people that lot

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes, but shortly after he cast his vote to end the individual mandate, causing less people to be insured and costs to rise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yup. Right before his passing a few months later.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah. Tim Walz mentioned that in the debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

“in contradiction of history” is just a fancy way of saying that he lied. Call him a fucking liar like he is.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Journalistically, I think “lying” implies willfullness, and a reporter cannot 100% prove that a false statement was made willfully, with knowledge that the statement was false.

What the reporter can do is point out that the statement was false, with evidence that demonstrates that, even including statements to the contrary by the person making the false statement before and after. But you can’t know for sure in the moment a false statement is being made that the person believed it was false as they were making it.

This journalistic concept is part of the reason the couch fucker meme took off. AP (was it AP?) published a story about how “No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch,” and then retracted it. Why? Because while there’s no evidence that JD Vance did have sex with a couch, and there’s plenty of evidence that JD Vance having sex with a couch was just a joke, there isn’t any proof that JD Vance didn’t have sex with a couch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And yet Fox News will run a dozen stories on how Walz “lied” about his time in China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That was bizarre and I have no idea what it was truly about. Seemed personal. On the other hand, just the other week Vance told some lies and brought terrorism to a community because of it. Which one is more important?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol, you think Fox “News” is actually news? They’ve successfully argued in court that they’re an entertainment company, so anyone who thinks their name means they have anything more than a tenuous connection to the truth is either dumb as fuck or just not paying any attention.

So the core Faux Lies viewer base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

Trump and the GOP are directly responsible for killing the part of ACA that required people to have insurance in 2017. That is what allowed all the young healthy people to drop their insurance which caused costs to go up for everyone else. It de-socialized it.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Cuts_and_Jobs_Act

permalink
report
reply
5 points

That’s sort of true, sort of not. The insurance companies were foaming at the mouth for this. It means they are unchecked in their march towards profit.

This was going to raise the price of medical care regardless of whether healthy people were in it or not. We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.

This is the exact reason why the mandate existed. Having all the young and healthy people paying into the insurance as well offsets the costs. That being said it would have been far better to have a public insurance run by the government that wasn’t beholden to profit. AKA M4A

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We can send billions to Israel to start WW3 with. But we can’t give health care to our own population.

God I hate this country. Especially the leadership

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m 100% for universal health, single payer, or whatever gets health insurance companies out of the game.

But even if healthy people were forced into the system the ACA still makes private insurance unaffordable for regular people. If you don’t have an employee who’s sponsoring it, you’re fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Good. I didn’t need health insurance.

No one needs healthcare insurance, until they get sick or hurt. Do you have some knowledge of immortality and invulnerability the rest of humanity isn’t aware of?

The rest of ACA was fine. Don’t force your shit on me then make me pay for it if I’m not participating. I was poor as hell.

If you were that poor the ACA would pay for your health insurance for you…unless you lived in a state that decided to reject the free money the Federal Government gave states to pay for poor people’s coverage. If thats your case, your issue is with your elected state government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I can’t quite remember all the details, but since my friend was still living with his parents he had to pay for the “catastrophic” insurance since he was over 26 and didn’t work with a company that offered anything. He might have been unemployed at that point. I think it was only $75/mo or so but I wonder if he just filled out the form wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The youth is already paying for the elderly. It’s called Medicare. The real question is whether the young people who are healthy pay for those that are less lucky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

It was interesting, but not surprising, that he said both that Obamacare was a failure, and that they would protect all the parts of it that people enjoy.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

I liked “we don’t need Obamacare because we have legislation protecting people with preexisting conditions”

Yeah, that would be Obamacare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Obamacare and the ACA is just the Hannah Montana of Republican healthcare policy. They are running on getting rid of the singer but promising to keep the Miley around. I’m high so I’ll stop now

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

…what you do high they do stone sober. With a lawyer in the room to make sure they are on solid ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I like the way your stoned ass thinks lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Obama was right. Once people lived with the ACA, they wouldn’t want to go back. The GOP knows that now, so now they’re going to pretend that they fixed it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

All Donnie had to do was get his Congress to vote in some meaningless changes, and then proclaim that he’d ‘fixed Obamacare’ and take a victory lap. Put TrumpCare on the site and tell his MAGoos to sign up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.6K

    Posts

  • 135K

    Comments