Bro really tried to sell his subscribers a “50$ a year” subscription to a “wallpaper” app.

Interesting points about the “app”:

  • the app has premium and free wallpapers
  • the free wallpapers are only available in sd quality and if you want hd youd have to subscribe
  • in order to unlock the sd quality you have to watch two 30 second ads.
  • theres a wallpaper called “orange” thats just the color orange
19 points

Now that’s a big L.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

Way more than that.

  • requires crazy permissions like user location
  • wallpapers are in a publicly accessible s3 bucket
  • profit split for wallpaper creators is 50/50 which is worse than most app store splits
  • most of the creators actually seem to be current MKBHD employees
  • app is either built from a template or an old app that they bought

Source: https://youtu.be/prZ7ZfdFrNs

permalink
report
reply
23 points

wallpapers are in a publicly accessible s3 bucket

How are we still doing this, how

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Cuz iz ez, am lazy

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

remember kids, if you take on responsibilities like renting out a studio space, and hiring employees, those costs are only going to go up, regardless of whether or not you continue to make the sort of revenue you’ve historically made from video views, which leads to having to rely more on merch sales, and patreon, and “other” revenue streams just to keep everyone paid. i mean, who knew, right?

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

I rarely watch his videos, but that’s because when I have, he clearly has direct financial entanglements and conflicts with the same major brands he’s discussing or “reviewing”.

For a channel his size and reach, I can’t imagine those aren’t enough to cover his overhead, unless he’s made some really terrible business decisions.

This is, of course, entirely speculation and based off of calculations pulled from my brown star, so maybe I’m wrong about that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I’ve been using Clarity on iOS and macOS for wallpapers. Costs $5 a year. Wallpapers are high quality. My only complaint is the macOS version has less selection and features compared to the iOS version.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Respectfully, I’m honestly confused by this why are you paying any amount of money for wallpapers? I’ve never had an issue finding high quality images for my devices, phone or desktop. What exactly is the service doing that makes paying $5 the easier option?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

It’s so cheap that I haven’t given it much critical thought. For me I suppose it’s mainly convenience. The iOS version has some shortcuts and widgets I find convenient for discovering new wallpapers. The Mac version is a little menubar app. I change my wallpapers frequently and I don’t necessarily want to open a website everytime to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well, paying $5 so you don’t have to open a website sounds like a waste to me, even if $5 is a small amount to you. But it’s your money, so you do you I guess. Thanks for the clarification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I really want to go through your finances and see how many subscriptions you don’t need I can reroute to my bank account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Maybe I’m scarred but I have a reflexive distrust for any usage of “pumped” or “super excited” in a commercial context. No matter the subject.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

pumped: artificially inflated

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And remember kids, pump always comes before the dump

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 349

    Posts

  • 9.5K

    Comments

Community moderators