5 points

I’ve left Firefox twice now and come back. It’s still far less shitty than the other main options.

permalink
report
reply
302 points

I’ve seen predictions of Firefox’s downfall for decades. Still waiting for it to happen.

It’s really easy to see the headlines saying things like “Firefox is tracking it’s users and violating their privacy!!!” And panic. But digging into the latest “scandal” (the PPA), it seems like Firefox is behaving pretty reasonably.

One of the main criticisms is that it’s opt-out instead of opt-in. Which… I kind of agree with Mozilla on. 99% of users aren’t going to know or care about this, and the 1% that do are the kind of people who probably would have extensions to disable it or just use some obscure ultra-private browser instead.

I don’t fault NOYB for bringing it up either. It’s good to have organizations like that keeping an eye out for everyone.

But I also get worried that sometimes communies attack their closest allies for being imperfect harder than enemies actively working against their interests.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

For whatever reason Lemmy seems to have an anti-firefox agenda. They make some good points but most of the posts on Lemmy are just pure emotion, speculations, and FUD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s in the last line of their comment:

But I also get worried that sometimes communies attack their closest allies for being imperfect harder than enemies actively working against their interests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

As a former moderator of r/Firefox… We inherited this from reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It was pretty bad on Reddit but seems worse here haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve seen the exact opposite of that until very recently honestly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

If they were violating people’s privacy, it would be completely unacceptable to make it opt-out.

But they aren’t. They are doing things that some people believe they’ll want to violate people’s privacy in the future to do in a different way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I didn’t know what it was, so I looked it up. Their description is here:

https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2024/08/22/ppa-update/

It sounds interesting… It also sounds like it will fail, because Mozilla seems to think that trackers are primarily interested in collecting ad stats, and that targeted advertising is less critical, but I think in reality it’s the other way around, and advertisers won’t accept such a limited solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I see no benefit to this because it will never be used instead of traditional tracking. It will just be a way for advertisers to get data from people who are blocking normal trackers and get even more data from people who aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh, I wish them the best and hope they succeed.

But I also think they’ll fail. And not even for that one reason, I think there are enough advertisers not interested on tracking to make it succeed. I just think they’ll flounder it. What is too bad, because they are the ones best positioned to make it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The sanest take yet. If this were reddit and gold meant anything, you’d deserve it

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I was an early adopter of Firefox 20+ years ago. It started going downhill more than 15 years ago and I bailed to Chrome when that launched. It really was better than Firefox at the time. Then Chrome got worse and I wound up back on Firefox, not because Firefox had gotten better in that time but because everything else had gotten worse than Firefox in the intervening time. Also, if going from 48% market share in 2009 to a barely relevant <5% in 2024 doesn’t count as a downfall I’m not sure what does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Firefox not getting better in the last 15 years is quite disingenuous though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Also the plugins eventually caught up and made it more usable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The most fragile thing to me is their funding stream, which may even serve as a source of enshittification demands, implemented as subtly as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh so tracking cookies should be the same, find the settings menu to opt out since the majority of the population just clicks to accept everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

PPA works for ad networks and not users. I don’t care about your ‘moderate take’ about a technology invented by the actual opposition who would strip-mine your corpse for minerals if they were given the opportunity just because it’s not as evil as it could be. It is still evil technology that works against you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m just following the warning signs, in the last year:

There’s the news of the opt-out only on tracking as you brought up. Then they fired one of their open source executives because he had the audacity to get cancer. Then they acquired an ad company because “we’re built different and we can fix her and totally not get corrupted by ads in the process”. Then the AI shit oh and ofc the news where they almost sucked Putin’s dick and pulled FF from being accessible in Russia for a day or 2

And a bunch of other stuff that I’m probably forgetting about. And that’s just within the last year.

Google and Chrome were great to! Until they weren’t. FF probably won’t ever actually die, not for a while at least. But the User and Privacy first aspects certainly will. They’ll probably succumb to enshittification and become like any other corporate browser like Chrome or Edge for years to come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Ah I just searched for Firefox news and the PPA thing was the only one that came up.

As for firing the executive, I can’t find anything about him being specifically relayed to being open-source anything. Steve Teixeira was their Chief Product Office briefly- he only was hired in 2022 and left the company a few months ago, and prior to that he worked for Facebook, Microsoft, and Twitter. So I don’t think this can really be framed as some attack on open-source or privacy. If the allegations are true that they discriminated against him for having cancer that’s shitty of course, but Mozilla has of course claimed that they did not and it’s going to court. They didn’t fire him either- they asked him to take a demotion to Senior VP of Technology Strategy and he chose to leave instead.

Yes Mozilla bought an ad company. They’re called Anonym and their stated goal is to provide an advertising service that can exist profitably without violating privacy. I hate ads- I block as many as I can and I use a pi-hole. I avoid ad-supported services as much as possible. I’m also privileged enough that I can afford to pay for a subscription to a lot of stuff or just buy physical media to rip and store on my own server. But there was a time when I was a broke college student stuck using campus Internet and playing by their rules, so the safest option I could afford was just to watch ads. Ads can be an ethical business model that helps improve the lives of low-income households. For people with legal or ethical concerns about piracy, or additional restrictions on their Internet, or who just lack the technical skill.

It’s certainly fair to keep an eye on Anonym and Mozilla in this regard, but I haven’t seen anything objectionable there yet.

Similar for the Mozilla AI. It seems it’s still in it’s infancy and I’m not a fan of companies jumping on the air bandwagon in general, but at the very least Mozilla has identified the problems with other AI’s and is looking to create a better alternative. If they get caught stealing training data, releasing tools to allow high schoolers to make deep fake revenge porn, tell people to start putting glue in their pizza cheese, or some other crap like that then they should absolutely be criticized for it. But none of that has happened yet that I’m aware of.

I also can’t find exactly what you’re referring to with Russia. The closest thing is that it looks like there were some extensions that were made to work around Russian state censorship. The Russian government passed a law in March banning such workarounds. In response, Mozilla took down 5 extensions, reviewed them, and then decided to reinstate them in June. Not quite ideal, but still seems like reasonable action to me.

It’s fair and a good thing to criticize Mozilla and Firefox. But it seems like you’re trying to spin every single move they make as a sign the sky is falling.

And I also know that there are both states and corporations paying people to go on the Internet and push propaganda. Firrfox has a lot of enemies. You cant just blindly believe every article saying they are succumbing to enshittification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Really awesome response, thanks for sharing a different opinion on all the points people have been bringing up in this thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
183 points

permalink
report
reply
76 points

This process has been underway since the project switched their focus from the Mozilla Suite to Firefox. Early Firefox was lightweight with limited features and the idea that you would add your own as extensions for the features you wanted. Then it started gaining traction and the Mozilla developers started forcing features in that should’ve been extensions. It’s been downhill ever since!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Even better, they took actual extensions and made them built-in and impossible to remove. The work was already done to keep a lightweight browser with extra features in option, and they reverted it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Can confirm, this is accurate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

A few months ago people would have still downvoted your comment, but the message has made it to everyone now. Mozilla and with that Firefox is an endangered species that needs to be steered back into safety.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Fucking Pocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

It’s been going for years now. We just don’t want to move away because, frankly, there’s little viable alternatives.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Some people are working on ladybird atleast. And gnome web preforms decent

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Some people are working on ladybird atleast.

Another permissively licensed toy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Video Streaming on Gnome Web is a mess. Especially on YouTube. And It’s still lacking addons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Very manageable though. Probably easier to fix then Mozilla’s enshitification

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

safari? but it only comes on mac and apple devices (OK not a good idea for a question)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

i think that the first sign of enshitification is its leaders and it seems like it’s already here.

i’m wondering what browser to switch to next.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Lynx

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

lemmyverse

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

M-x eww

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dammit you beat me to it

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Ladybird! Though it’s not slated to be fully ready till 2026

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t it has some political issues?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If I recall correctly, they rejected a patch to make their documentation inclusive, rather than assuming that developers were all male, calling it a political crusade. It’s not so much a political problem as a sexism issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Zen browser has been an interesting experience. Librewolf & Mullvad have been great 🤠

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

librewolf is my most likely bet; i want to stay away from anything chromium based.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

ladybird might become a thing someday. And if all else fails we can still use curl or emacs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve also been trying out zen. While I really enjoy the sleek Ui and some addons it’s kind of slower than „vanilla Firefox“ which it depends on if I’m not wrong. I’ve tried on multiple machines though mainly on my work laptop which is quite beefy. I’m still using zen though so take what you want from that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Librewolf is firefox based but still good for now. But long term we need either another engine or a major fork of firefox not just a cleaned up copy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i’m aware of it and havent yet jumped the wagon because of my experience in the past w other firefox clones like iceweasel.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy Shitpost

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 56K

    Comments