-7 points
Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Newsweek:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.newsweek.com/project-2025-unpopularity-continues-grow-new-poll-1957581

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
-100 points
*

And yet when piecemealed liberals and Republicans will completely embrace the aspects of project 2025. The same way they’re doing KOSA which originated with the HF

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Not as bad as schilling for the Russian plant Jill Stein— or acting like a traitor to promote a foreign power during an election.

You don’t know anyone like that, do you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

Liberals are so desperate to smear anything that’s a threat to their privilege in society and a perceived threat to the breadcrumbs that get tossed to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

goddamn the rock hard edge on this one, it’s sooo cooool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Removed by mod for good reason!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

You think everyone that’s not voting for Harris is “shilling.” Dude, you are shilling for Harris all the time. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Im not getting paid by a foreign actor to do that, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This is so self-evidently preposterous I don’t even know what I could add to further refute it.

What do you think people hate about it, the name? Come on. Hatred for the proposals in it is the most bipartisan thing I’ve seen in a decade at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

KOSA which came from the Heritage Foundation recently passed the Senate 93 - 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Go familiarize yourself with the total aims of Project 2025 and then maybe you’ll see why you look like a complete shill trying to equate these 2 things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul”

https://youtu.be/yptXkLglKkA

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I can’t help if you are clueless how things are interconnected

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes, project 2025, loaded with unpopular ideas, opposed primarily by democrats, is actually a democrat wetdream. Because democrats have proven repeatedly their agenda is always rolling back human rights /s

It’s moronic. You discredit yourself so hard, it’s actually hard to top your own words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

4%

That’s… That’s pretty low.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Still too high

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Those are probably just the people who would benefit from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

There’s some info stickers the Harris campaign sells if you want to help lower that for the people around you. Or at least increase the number of unfavorable view of it

https://store.kamalaharris.com/look-up-project-2025/

(Can also make your own stickers like that too)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Those colors make them look like Mr Yuck Yuk stickers! Perfection!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s also apparently an audiobook recording on YouTube, for if you wanna be mad while exercising or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This should be amended to say that “Republicans support Project 2025, look it up”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That really depends… if I gave you a drink with a 4pct chance you’d die an agonizing death… would you drink it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

57% is also way too low. That sjould be in the 80s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Agreed, but there are a lot of low-information voters out there who have probably never heard of it because they don’t follow political news closely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

We should take that 4% and put them on a remote island. We don’t need to bother shipping over food, I’m sure their God will provide it for them and they’ll all get to live in a blissful paradise.

permalink
report
reply
108 points

At minimum 4% of USA citizens are complete monsters with hate in their hearts. It’s actually much higher, but for sure we say that 4% are awful people.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

My current estimate is ~20-40%

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

7% of the 40% are the foolish following the dark triads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

4% is around the lizardman constant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

33% of a country are always Authoritarians. Those are the people who vote to end democratic rule and install dictatorships.

https://theauthoritarians.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This sums up the recent election results in the German states Brandenburg, Thüringen and Sachsen, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I highly recommend that book. Lays out the problems with RWAs (right wing authoritarians).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

More than that, the percentage of voters who opposed ending segregation was surprising.

I suppose we could start with ‘the states that literally fought a war and killed their countrymen to keep humans as pets’, though there’s spillover.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.7K

    Posts

  • 136K

    Comments