-100 points
*

And yet when piecemealed liberals and Republicans will completely embrace the aspects of project 2025. The same way they’re doing KOSA which originated with the HF

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Not as bad as schilling for the Russian plant Jill Stein— or acting like a traitor to promote a foreign power during an election.

You don’t know anyone like that, do you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

Liberals are so desperate to smear anything that’s a threat to their privilege in society and a perceived threat to the breadcrumbs that get tossed to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

goddamn the rock hard edge on this one, it’s sooo cooool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Removed by mod for good reason!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

You think everyone that’s not voting for Harris is “shilling.” Dude, you are shilling for Harris all the time. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Im not getting paid by a foreign actor to do that, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

KOSA which came from the Heritage Foundation recently passed the Senate 93 - 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Go familiarize yourself with the total aims of Project 2025 and then maybe you’ll see why you look like a complete shill trying to equate these 2 things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I can’t help if you are clueless how things are interconnected

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes, project 2025, loaded with unpopular ideas, opposed primarily by democrats, is actually a democrat wetdream. Because democrats have proven repeatedly their agenda is always rolling back human rights /s

It’s moronic. You discredit yourself so hard, it’s actually hard to top your own words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul”

https://youtu.be/yptXkLglKkA

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This is so self-evidently preposterous I don’t even know what I could add to further refute it.

What do you think people hate about it, the name? Come on. Hatred for the proposals in it is the most bipartisan thing I’ve seen in a decade at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Newsweek:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.newsweek.com/project-2025-unpopularity-continues-grow-new-poll-1957581

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

The other 39% view it unfavorably but don’t have the spine to speak out against their own party when they know the poll results will be publicized.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Or they view it favorably, but don’t have the spine to say the quiet part out loud because people would correctly label them as fascist monsters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Project 2025 has a 57% unfavorable rating, but the party that endorses it does not.

Curious.

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

Fans of the Leopards Eating Faces Party don’t like it when it’s their faces being threatened.

(They’ll still vote for them, though.)

permalink
report
parent
reply

You hit the nail on the head. Fans.

They support the team even when it loses. Never mind It’s their own rights and lives that are being lost. Gang gang gang.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

more people realizing this would just make the us a dictatorship

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.6K

    Posts

  • 135K

    Comments