34 points

Does JP patent law not allow for prior art?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

JP patent law is fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

JP law is fucked. I heard you could get sued for leaving a bad review at a restaurant

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Japan is also one of the few countries where you aren’t assumed to be innocent until proven guilty. If you get arrested for a crime you have tl prove your innocence, which is why Japan has a conviction rate of over 99%

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Libel includes factual statements there

permalink
report
parent
reply
180 points

This patent was first submitted in late July 2024 and granted the following month, after Nintendo and The Pokemon Company asked for an accelerated review process.

What the fuck - so, they’re claiming infringement on a work that was released before they ever submitted their patent? How is that allowed? Are you telling me a company can wait until another company releases a similar product, then apply for a patent for something they used, then claim infringement? I knew patents were fucked, but I didn’t realize they were that fucked.

permalink
report
reply
120 points

How is that allowed?

Well it’s not, you aren’t supposed to be able to get a patent for something that already exists. But you know, corruption

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

It’s not. In fact you know how this kind of patent gets invalidated, by pointing out what’s know as prior art. Things that did “this” before that patent was filed. So Palworlds and any other game that involves capturing a creature. This “killer patent” won’t stand up in Court unless the Japanese Court is entirely different than the US and German Courts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The request for an expedited review of patent number 7545191 also facilitated the approval of three other patents from Nintendo and The Pokemon Company (7528390, 7493117 and 7505854). Kurihara noted that amending an existing patent for specific litigation purposes is an established industry practice, and possibly what happened in this particular case.

This does not make sense to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Not in tbe US it’s not.

An existing implementation would be prior art and make it EXTREMELY easy to get the patent invalidated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

yea that sounds nasty

just don’t patent anything, other companies build a product around an unpatented idea, then you patent it and sue them? now their entire product is ruined??

this makes no sense, that would mean the optimal play is to not patent anything until someone else starts doing it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nintendo’s stagnated and has become a patent troll

as someone that used to be a fan I’m sad as it’s hard to be hyped for any of their games when they’re widely known for pulling these kinds of scummy tactics time and time again

indies be dammed, it’s too much of a risk to make Nintendo-inspired games let alone direct fan-games

permalink
report
reply
25 points

It’s a shame you can’t support nintendo’s developers while excluding their legal department. Oh well, the high seas mean I still get to enjoy what I want to

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

People can’t even make a mod that requires the base game to work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Nintendo has always been an underhanded bully. This isn’t new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Ya their patent crap precedes year 2000

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And is just an extension to their licensing nonsense and publishing deals thst came beforex

Anyone surprised by any of this doesn’t care about Nintendo’s behaviour, just the impact the current move is having on their current fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nintendo…not even pirated.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Ugh, the suspense… When will we even get to know what the accusations are about? Is this Japan or Kafka’s Trial?

permalink
report
reply

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Create post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 7K

    Comments