No one even thought to ask about it in the debate.

ITT: people resistant to the idea that what the judicial branch is doing is seriously wrong.

73 points

Jesus fucking Christ. That was only two months ago? Fuck you, Time, can you just be consistent for like even a second?

permalink
report
reply
60 points

I mean, have you followed what’s been happening in the last two months?

I’ve aged 28 years.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Right, but this is how we slip into authoritarianism. Lose on all fronts over and over and even if we walk away from a battle they’ve gained ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Because nobody’s taken advantage of it. It was written for trump. This meme will age like roadkill.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Oh, good. I’m sure that we’ll never have another corrupt president, so there’s absolutely no need to worry!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have no idea what that even means. The entire point is that it’s written for a corrupt president, one will take advantage of it, and we’re supposed to worry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I don’t care how the meme ages. If people get to see the consequences they’re the ones who should have gave a shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As a European: I give a shit, but that tanker of a shitshow is barreling down like there’s no tomorrow.

permalink
report
parent
reply

We have a whole “anti-woke” culture. These people are actually against being aware of social injustice. It’s like when they were up in arms against anti-fasicts. Hmmmmm, who would take issue with an anti-fascist movement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Kamala did bring it up in the debate. And that was about it.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

So Biden could assassinate Trump and the courts just shrug?

permalink
report
reply
35 points

The ruling is vague enough that any specific cases can be decided based on the court’s political preferences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The entire point is that Biden won’t, though. It’s just more of the rules for thee, not for me shit that fascists love.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

No, he can’t. It would turn out that isn’t an official act, because reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

So, kinda. The ruling did have more nuance than a lot of people take from it, but it’s still not a good ruling by any means.

The president has absolute personal immunity for core constitutional acts, and the presumption of immunity for official acts.

That means that you can’t sue Biden for vetoing a bill, or other things defined in the constitution. That doesn’t mean you can’t sue the office of the president, but that you can’t sue the individual.
The next part is that the courts need to assume that there’s immunity for anything done “as the president” unless the prosecution can argue that not having immunity couldn’t possibly infringe on a power of the president, and you can’t use the presidents motivation to make that case.

So the president talks to the justice department about what they can do to sway the election for him: you can only talk about the impact of holding the president liable for talking to the justice department about elections.

You can’t talk about the president assassinating a political rival because that introduces their motive. “Would the office of the president be hindered by holding them personally liable for using the constitutional power to command the military to target a threat to the country”.

Trumps family could sue, but Biden wouldn’t be liable, only the executive branch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Step one, remove the opposition justices on the Supreme Court and install your own. Step two, have them decide what you did was lawful.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 9.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 63K

    Comments