The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

106 points

Same time next Presidential election, Jill?

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I mean she could use the time between to build local support for the Green Party in lots of places. I guess that isn’t what she’s after.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

And God forbid they spend any money on local elections where they can affect things like I don’t know actual green party issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Sure usually hangs out in Russia between elections, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The Winter Candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That looks like a weapon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is it a record player needle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

More’s the pity, she can’t run for president of Russia either.

permalink
report
reply
41 points
*

while normally I’d be upset if they were running somebody with some kind of real intent to push real issues, its clear Stein is mostly isnt interested in pushing anything but conspiracy theories and russian appeasement.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

But if we don’t vote 3rd party then democrats will never do the exact things I want, or some shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ll be voting solid blue regardless, but the “exact things I want” in regards to Democrats is not helping a genocide, because I thought that was a bar even they could pass.

I’m not surprised they failed even that, but it does radicalize me further and solidify my position that all liberals that call themselves leftists out of rampant ignorance can fuck off forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And that will definitely change by voting 3rd party Ina presidential election!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Yes, that latter point does describe how well you have summarized other people’s arguments. Good luck to you on that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Considering there is not a good argument for voting for a third party presidential candidate in this election vs. not voting at all, I don’t think the summary matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

What “conspiracy theories”? Do you think that the genocide in Gaza is a conspiracy theory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

people forget about her vaccine skepticism, which is sad in a post covid world. There’s a reason she didnt run in 2020

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Anti-democratic propoganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Stein is pro-vaccine, as she has stated in numerous interviews. If she had won in 2016, we would’ve had a medical doctor in the White House during a pandemic, and hundreds of thousands of lives could’ve been saved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Oh dear, that’s going to make her path to an electoral college victory harder, isn’t it.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

She has 49 other states she can fail to win in…

but still siphon enough votes to hand trump the whitehouse

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I feel like she isn’t on the ballot in a large number of states. I feel like basic research would reveal this fact. I feel like she isn’t going to siphon many votes away from Harris. I know for sure that people want to be able to blame her if Harris loses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

She doesnt need to pull that many votes from the Dems, the race is on a knife edge pretty much everywhere.

She’s also on the ballot in 39 states, which includes all of the battle ground states except nevada

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

270 to win!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not realistically, no. It’s just about the same amount of difficulty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Why can’t these candidates file proper forms? What the hell is so difficult about that?

permalink
report
reply
19 points

There are a miniscule number of presidential candidates running in a given year, so I assume that the UX on the process isn’t very optimized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

but she’s done this like 3 times already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

running for president is literally all she does. she should be able to speedrun this by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

@DrunkEngineer explained it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

They were given the wrong forms by the secretary of state. Its obvious sabotage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ha ha. After being shown the forms your face saving argument changes. Now they were the wrong forms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

I never said they werent and still no one has been able to show them to me

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 161K

    Comments