California firefighters had to douse a flaming battery in a Tesla Semi with about 50,000 gallons (190,000 liters) of water to extinguish flames after a crash, the National Transportation Safety Board said Thursday.

In addition to the huge amount of water, firefighters used an aircraft to drop fire retardant on the “immediate area” of the electric truck as a precautionary measure, the agency said in a preliminary report.

Firefighters said previously that the battery reached temperatures of 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit (540 Celsius) while it was in flames.

The NTSB sent investigators to the Aug. 19 crash along Interstate 80 near Emigrant Gap, about 70 miles (113 kilometers) northeast of Sacramento. The agency said it would look into fire risks posed by the truck’s large lithium-ion battery.

63 points

Our town had to use an excavator and dozer to bury a Tesla car because it wouldn’t stop burning.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Our town…

Do you mean Babylon, Marduk?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

😃

I don’t want to say the town’s name. I am a CERT member and that’s where I heard about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I read in a firefighter’s thread that the trick is to use a low pressure spray directly on the battery compartment. (It was a thread about Tesla cars not semis though so that might not apply)

The reason was you can’t actually put the fire out, it’s self oxidizing (it can literally burn underwater) so you basically need to wait till it burns itself out. Fortunately batteries only hold something like 1/10th the energy of gasoline and can’t release that energy as quickly so a fine light spray is enough to keep it from getting hot enough to catch anything else on fire including batteries in the surrounding battery modules.

Takes a long time, like hours to get it to a point they can move the vehicle and literally a couple weeks before the reaction completely fizzles out. They have special lots they tow them to where the car can fizzle itself out without damaging anything surrounding it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Is this 190 tons of water?

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

189.27 metric tons of water, so yes, rounded up, 190 tons.

Or roughly 2.5 average swimming pools and for those ex-redditors out there: 1.6 million bananas

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Something tells me that we have to move away from cobalt/manganese chemistries for BEVs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Solid state batteries are supposedly much more fire resistant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How are you getting 189.27? 1 liter is 1kg, so it should be 190 precisely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because we are discussing metric tons of water where 264.17 US gallons = 1 metric ton of fresh water @ 4’C

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

What size is an average swimming pool area-wise? Or are you talking about Olympic size swimming pools?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Feet: 16’ x 32’ w/ a 4’ shallow end and an 8’ deep end filled with fresh water at an exact temperature of 39.2’F.

Metric: 4.9m x 9.7m w/ a 1.2m shallow end and a 2.4m deep end filled with fresh water at an exact temperature of 4’C.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How many washing machines

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

removedant?

lol

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

Probably only shows up that way on lemmy.ml, which has a blocker for various things they consider slurs, which can become silly when you’re dealing with words/phrase like “fire retardants.” Looks normal to me over on blahaj, and the same over on lemmy.world

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s the Scunthorpe Problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The Sremovedhorpe problem, you say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Probably only shows up that way on lemmy.ml, which has a blocker for various things they consider slurs

Lmao, the community most likely to complain about censorship…is practicing… censorship lolol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for that. I was unaware that is how it worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

And morons keep buying Teslas.

It really seems like Elon Musk has been given free reign to kill people.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

To be fair, won’t this be an issue for all EVs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good point. I’m not sure. It may be that we’re (I’m) hearing more about Teslas catching fire because they’re the largest distributor in the US (and I live here). However, they’re not the largest in the world and I haven’t heard of this problem happening with other EVs (though they may be).

Regardless, Elon Musk is a pompous charlatan and defrauder that deserves much worse than he’ll ever get. Bias be damned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wouldn’t be surprised Tesla uses shit quality batteries

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wow, you should look into the hundreds of ev car fires in China that happen for may more reasons than crashes. Such as charging the battery and just sitting there in traffic or just sitting in an ev car lot. BYD is one of the largest ev brands in China, and their shit just catches fire for no reason some times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wasn’t there an entire ship of Audis?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You don’t hear about them because Western media doesn’t make as big a deal about them.

If you can throw the word Tesla or Elon on something it gets plastered everywhere, including here.

Same with recalls.

Tesla recalls something software related like the unbuckled seat belt chime not working if you do steps A B then C and its huge news. Within the next 2 weeks 5 or 6 other major OEMs do recalls and you barely hear about it. And yes, recalls happen in groups like that where other OEMs wait for someone to go first and take the bigger hit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Totally. And ICE cars never burn, amirite?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It does take a lot less effort to put out an ICE engine fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, but at least you can put those out with water when it happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. This kind of safety issue isn’t universal to all lithium chemistries, much less other chemistries. If they do catch on fire, it isn’t self-oxidizing the way it is for Li-Po chemistry. Other types also have better resilience to punctures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

All forms of high-density energy storage are dangerous, regardless of who manufactures them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s any lithium battery, not just one evil villain. At least you’re not recharging your car inside the living space of your house, like your computer or phone or e-bike or e-scooter or vacuum cleaner

Personally I think there’s a market for a fire proof container for charging batteries. I’ve been thinking about stacking cinder blocks in my basement for charging yardcare and tool batteries such that they couldn’t catch anything just in case

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wasn’t aware. I think that’s a great idea, honestly. Keep yourself safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is not a Tesla problem. This is electric vehicle problem.

My local fire department once had to put out the same VW Buzz 3 times because it kept re-igniting. Nowdays they have containers filled with water that they completely submerge electric vehicles into that had caught fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It’s a Tesla problem in that it is a bumrushing tech that hasn’t matured for what it’s being used for because profit motive.

And no, if the tech isn’t mature to be both useful AND safe in the event of failure operating in the world, it belongs in the lab, not up for sale.

We shouldn’t be mass producing any vehicles that become bombs/environmental disasters that standard fire and rescue can’t appropriately address with reasonable tools upon crashing, because they inevitably will.

Its a market capitalism problem. Fire, ready, aim because rush the pos to sale. Musk is certainly a standard bearer as a prominent “get government and society’s wellbeing out of the way of my quarterly profit expectations” asshole sociopath capitalist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We don’t have time to perfect and mature the tech though. That was 40 years ago. Now it’s whatever fucking works that isn’t fossil fuels and burning of them. It’s a damn sight safer than an ICE which is actually carrying extremely combustible liquids in it too. It’s not perfect but it’s better and this kind of " we have to hold off" is effectively supporting the status quo which is fuckig everything up as it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think your feelings toward Elon may be clouding your judgement here a bit. Putting out electric vehicle fire is hard, independent of the brand of the vehicle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Maybe don’t use water to put out a fire that can’t be put out with water. Aren’t these supposed to be professionals?

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Flooding the batteries with water is the best way to put out a lithium-ion battery fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Isn’t oxygen deprivation (usually through burying) a much faster method?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Do you volunteer your backyard for such burials?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Maybe for smaller things, a regular car maybe.

But by the time a suitable digging machine arrives on scene and digs a big enough hole for a semi it’d probably be faster to flood it with water. Not to mention what might be underneath the ground, so they’d also have to spend time determining if there’s any gas lines or whatever before they dig so they don’t make a much bigger problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Lithium fires are self-oxidizing, so that won’t work. Burying it helps keep it from spreading, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It isn’t.

https://youtu.be/qgP7KkDesBo?si=XNb_yZYwA943t0lP

Water seems to put it out for a bit, but the reaction is self-oxidizing and starts right back up again. That’s why it takes so much water; fire fighters keep dowsing it and then doing it again. Takes all day, and the whole thing burns away in the end.

The way to do it is, if possible, tow it somewhere away from other things, keep the fire from spreading, and otherwise let it burn. For cars, there are fireproof blankets coming on the market to contain it. Semi-trucks are probably too big for that, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

How many lithium ion battery fires have you put out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Two.

The best policy is to not puncture batteries, and train others to not do so.

The next best is to know to smother them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

how do you smother a semi fire on the highway, a) with a water tanker or b) with a sand tanker, how many municipalities have a sand tanker on hand, how do those sand tanker hoses work again, lots of sand tanker slingers round your parts cowpoke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Anyone dealing with batteries would have. It is more common than you think and not just people being keyboard warriors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

For as much as people want their Musky circlejerks. This is really just a problem with the switch the EVs that people aren’t willing to accept.

There is no way to really stop an EV battery fire.

The batteries in these cars are made up of several cells, packed into a watertight, fire resistant box. When just one of those cells goes it’s over. It can create a chemical reaction that can ignite the cells without the need for oxygen, pure heat will set them off.

The only real way of dealing with them is to let them burn themselves out, and even after that they aren’t safe and could reignite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The way to stop them is solid state batteries

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

that sounds great, where can I buy one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Or maybe just good guys with Li-ion batteries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not the electrolyte that’s the issue, it’s the lithium. Solid electrolyte batteries wont make any difference. Unless by solid state you mean, no chemical reaction and we just switch to electrostatic cells, but that is nowhere near viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’ll take my spinning platter batteries from my cold, dead hands

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

The purpose of the water is to cool the wreck and the area around it while the metal fire burns itself out, because waiting it out is the safest option for the firefighters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

AFAB?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

all fires are bad…?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments