94 points

I swear the number of car-brained people who have told me (when discussing a pedestrian or child death in a car):

Well what were they doing in the road???

Why the FUCK does it matter what they were doing in the road. I don’t care where the parents were. I don’t care what they were doing there. There is no excuse, I don’t care if it’s the freaking freeway, if you see someone you stop. But these people can’t even see over their hoods so they have no clue there’s even someone there, so they’ve shifted all blame to the other person. It couldn’t be my fault, it must be there’s!

Fuck I’m so mad at them, and the auto industry is also to blame for promoting that way of thinking. "If you’re in an auto accident, your family will be safe. Just fuck those other people right?)

It’s America’s selfishness, just blatantly on display.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

The 93 ford ranger was perfect. I hate these fucking abominations we have now and I think industry grossly underestimated the demand for a sensible pickup

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yep, first gen Tacoma is perfect in my mind. The new tacos are bigger than the F150 was! Why!? It’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Why!?

Because bigger vehicles can simply ignore various regulatory and efficiency requirements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And no modern truck owners remember those little trucks. They think being a truck owner means you have to have the biggest most ridiculous truck out there. Personally, I’d love it there was a smaller ranger sized EV truck. I’d buy one of those tomorrow if they gave up on massive monsteosities

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d buy the shit out of a plugin hybrid the size of a 93 ranger

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Take something the size of an original Ford Ranger, throw in a two-cylinder diesel generator and a battery pack and make it a series plugin hybrid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

That’s pretty homophobic

It’s hard to let people know you’re looking if they can’t see/hear you

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I had a 93 Ranger and I miss it a lot. It had an aftermarket moonroof that also leaked like a sieve, but man I loved that little truck. Good size for actual utility.

I rolled it years ago, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The 93 Ranger had a bigger cargo bed than most large pickups today, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a 95 driving it til the wheels fall off

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

@Windex007 @scrubbles
My dad had a white '68 Ford Ranger. I loved that truck. He later put a camper on it and drove us all around the contiguous Western U.S.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Not sure why you’d lie about something like this? Not exactly obscure knowledge that the Rangers first model year was 1983. Before that it was a trim package, if that’s what you mean that’s still a full size F-series.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

The old Ranger wasn’t a sensible pickup though. Those things are for people that want a pickup shaped object but don’t want a full size.

If a 4x8 sheet won’t fit flat in the bed it’s just a toy designed to carry other toys around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

What percentage of F150s have the maximum bed size for that vehicle which is 8 ft?

How much drywall do you think has been moved with a pickup with a box shorter than 8 ft?

What percentage of pickup trucks do you see without a single paint scuff in the box?

It’s not the size of a truck that makes it a toy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You know most modern trucks have a smaller bed than that little truck? Modern trucks are just minivans for insecure men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I watch Berm Peak (formerly seths bike hacks) and he recently did a video on a large expensive cargo bike intended for commuting with two kids.

He commented on the high price and safety features, and the large amount of time and resources spent on design to make it safe for anyone you might run into (as it’s large, unwieldy, and heavy as hell compared to normal bikes) and he in passing comments “but no-one wants to spend on keeping anyone else safe” and my jaw just dropped.

Everyone. Everyone wants to spend on that. Everyone who isn’t a goddamn psychopath who ignores the fact that you or someone you care about is just as likely to be on either end of such an accident.

Is that really just the default way to think in the states? I’ll spend on my survival, but no-one elses?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Welcome to the soul rot that has infected American culture

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes that is the default mindset. My rights and liberties first before anyone elses, anyone who can’t afford their rights and liberties doesn’t deserve them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I used to be more optimistic and would have said no before, but Trump really embodies the collective selfishness and fear that half of my country has. Half of our country really is “I got mine” thinkers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Eh. The road is for driving. Plenty of idiots also drive. Whaddyagonnado.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Improve the situation in the many, many, many, many proven ways that many, many, many, many countries and cities already do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Why Americans always complain about gas prices, then go ahead and choose the most inefficient vehicles?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Like with so many things, especially in the US, it seems to me the people complaining most loudly about it are the ones doing everything they can to make the problem worse for themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

There’s like 340 million of us. Lots of us are idiots. Some aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We like to believe our societies are a calm, rational place of logical decision makers.

We’re actually a rowdy bunch of anachronistic apes, with a chronic case of the hypocrititis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I like the title, I like the framing, but unfortunately it’s a nothing burger. They need to close the SUV/truck loophole and regulate vehicle size directly.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Pedestrians: “can you please make your cars a little safer for us?”

US carmakers:

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Too low to the ground, they might be able see a child in front of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Good point, how about this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Much better

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

When you snort so much iron oxide that the only notes you have on car design is "bigger! BIGGER! ADD SPIKES! "

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Just walk away and we will spare your lives. Just walk away”

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

The rules announced this week would update the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), the government’s bible for everything that’s required in a new vehicle before it’s sold — from steering wheels to rearview mirrors — to set testing procedures to simulate head-to-hood impact, with the aim of reducing head injuries. If enacted, automakers will have to test their vehicles using crash test dummies representing adult and child pedestrians for the first time. NHTSA says the changes could save up to 67 lives every year.

And they expect people to stop making trucks because of pedestrian crash testing? Seems unlikely.

At least this isn’t relying on sensors or some other nonsense. Though it might be nice to require things like visibility requirements so people driving Rams could actually see the children they’re flattening.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s a start, there’s obviously a long way to go for road safety in the US, but every little step helps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They are probably just going to let companies pay a “fee” (bribe) if their truck performs poorly (fails) during the testing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Create post

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn’t choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don’t use slurs. You can laugh at someone’s fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don’t post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn’t a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 330

    Posts

  • 2.3K

    Comments