4 points

It wasn’t a masterclass. It was functional. What she did masterfully was bait Mangolini into showing how incoherent he really is.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I think it will, but people won’t think it did. Harris was dropping slightly in the polls, Polymarket odds were up to 52/46 Trump. The betting markets being the most responsive item to check, it’s currently 50/49 Trump, back to tied. I think polls will look similar, back to essentially tied, but that’s where things were a couple weeks ago so it might just erase the mini slump from everyone’s mind.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The answer as always is, wait a week. We’ll know when the post debate polling hits the news.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

It will change a lot.

This will dramatically increase the number of Republicans who will tell everyone they’re not voting for him, and then vote for him.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

A few Republicans I know said they were going to vote libertarian or just not vote after watching the debate so she did pretty fucking well.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

A few Republicans I know said they were going to vote libertarian or just not vote

Very funny that he is straight up Biden-ing himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

libertarian

Is there even a candidate now that wormbrain dropped out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh yeah they have their own candidate. Just some guy. Probably the guy that doesn’t talk about age of consent laws too much. They try to pick a composed member of the party for that spot but who knows lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He fucked up dropping out as well as everything else. People can still vote 🪱 in a bunch of states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Despite how much they go on about how nuanced and special their views are, libertarians will find a way to vote GOP like they always do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You are likely right sadly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’m sure they said that.

I like to lie about things I’m ashamed of too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

“She makes some good points. I might vote for her if she wasn’t a Democrat” - Republicans

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“…or a woman, or not white.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have too many principles to vote for anyone like him!

*votes for him while touching self in booth to thought of capital gains cut

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 214K

    Comments