-6 points

The English language is already awkward enough, but it would help if the title didn’t have a double negative.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Transphobic bathroom ban

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

phobic + ban = double negative

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

No.

Phobic describes the motivation for the act, which is a ban.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

No it isn’t, that’s like saying, “Don’t feel sad” is a double negative

A double negative is something like, “Don’t not do that”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hate motivated ban

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

“Phobic” isn’t even in the title

“Anti-trans ban” is pretty simple, honestly.

You want obnoxious English, just read The Chaos: https://ncf.idallen.com/english.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It’s not just about using the bathroom I identify with.

I outright can not pass as male anymore. If I try to use the men’s restroom it’s going to cause a commotion and probably lead to me being assaulted, and I really don’t want to have to deal with going to court because I killed someone in self defense.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yeah, as an Ohio trans woman, I’m post op and my choices in presentation are to look like a non passing trans woman, a woman without qualifiers (those two are just random which I’m perceived as), or I can try to look male and look like a bad drag king or like a non passing trans man.

Maybe people just need to get used to people like us existing in public

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Anecdotally, if I saw a woman in the men’s room, I’d probably mind my own business like I always do.

It’s like the gym, I’m trying to do my thing and gtfo, no eye contact, no nothing.

I know I’m just one voice but I think it’s way stupid how interested we are in other people using the restroom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s a good point too. This basically means transgender people can’t go to gyms. A bathroom is one thing but changing rooms can make people a bit uneasy even when everyone is the same gender. This is going to lead to public disturbances and trans people getting arrested (definitely what the GOP wishes they could put into law).

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s on purpose. Sounds like you, and certainly I, don’t care. But it’s being drummed up for a reason. Bad actors, looking to do bad things, by placing a target on people’s backs. The worst kind of politics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t mind my own business when a woman accidentally walked into the bathroom I was using. That was mostly because I was using the urinal, and it was more visible than I’d like from the bathroom door. Not her fault, just badly designed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From personal experience I only started using the women’s restroom after men started yelling at me for using theirs. 🤷‍♀️

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

IMO we should abolish gendered restrooms. It’s unfair that women consistently have to wait longer in line. And before anyone makes some weak ass “think of the children” argument… I have two, actually watch them, and have gone into a million ladies rooms for changing tables.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

also, this is why ciswomen will sometimes use the men’s restroom. long line, desperation, potentially exacerbated by the fact that birthing children sometimes makes it harder to wait afterward.

side note - i almost never clock anyone as trans. i figure most people don’t, or don’t correctly (i have heard of people challenging butch ciswomen). how would most folks even know?! just mind your business and do your business, and let others do the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And there’s people here wanting you to not vote against this. VOTE LIKE LIVES DEPEND ON IT.

Now let’s see them call themselves out in response.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

First I think, what do Republicans think trans people are doing in the bathrooms? Then I think, oh, what are republicans doing in bathrooms?!

permalink
report
reply
57 points

Oh god I hate living in a red state. I’m not trans, but I just want them to be as acknowledged and their privacy respected as anyone else. This bill is just fear mongering and cruelty for cruelty’s sake.

Ohio is hopelessly gerrymandered to be red, with no hope of recovery, so anyone the Religious Right deems ‘abnormal’ would be better off getting out of the state, despite the big islands of blue in/around the big cities and college campuses. And that’s just sad.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

As your neighbor, I’m still jealous. At least Ohio allows citizens to propose ballot measures. WV doesn’t even have that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.7K

    Posts

  • 136K

    Comments