55 points

So they settled on their defamation case because the PAC was losing donations based on her counter-claims, but she never went after them legally for slander or anything related to claims.

Didn’t they have photos of her and her profile website?

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Yep. Had a profile and pics on sugardaddymeet.

Plus had another profile claiming she was an actress on Explore Talent. Which oddly enough so did Candice Owens. And a few other random people that have become GOP props. https://x.com/DelVeneto/status/1432793689848520704/photo/1

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Screenshots for those who don’t want to open xitter

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sooo… Boebert had 9 videos on that site. I hope they come out for a number of reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is just too good (or too bad depending on who you ask) to be true. I know they are conservative grifters, but I would believe the claim about Boebert and I doubt the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Boy, wouldn’t it be something if these awful human beings were literally paid actors/actresses? That makes everything in the world of politics incredibly distressing, yet I wouldn’t be surprised one bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Imagine paying to fuck grandma BoeBo🤢🤮

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It looks like she was just trying to win some shady modeling contest by creating a profile and uploading pictures

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Settlements are just pricetags

permalink
report
reply
17 points

“Nobody admits fault” is code for “give us enough money and we’ll never publicly prove your guilt”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That article needs an editor, a lot of it doesn’t make sense.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Sounds like it was written by AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments