228 points

It probably saves insane amounts of bandwidth. But at what cost :(

permalink
report
reply
58 points

I’m sure they have a legitimate numerical value for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

I dunno, I’ve been in a few meetings where people with deep pockets make critical infrastructure decisions based on extremely limited information. Trusting “them” to have a valid metric is a rookie mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The older you get you realize more and more that the people making the decisions are totally clueless.
…Until you become one of the decision makers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yuuuuuuup.

“How much will option A cost? Dunno.”
“What about option B? Dunno.”
“My gut tells me B is much more expensive than A though.” “Yeah for sure. But I prefer B.”

Wanna waste a hundred grand a year? Go right ahead, who cares. Wanna hire someone? Woah hold your horses there bucko, don’t you know we have budget limitations??

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

The cost of shareholder profits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

wait isnt it the other way around, buffering was costing profits for shareholders so they limited it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Curious as to why that would be the case. Unless people are starting videos, letting them buffer, then reloading and doing it again.

It should be the same amount of bandwidth, otherwise, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

It’s just people not finishing videos. Buffered but never played. In aggregate it adds up to a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah i dont use youtube like that either but lots of people open videos and close them without finishing them because loss of interest or attention or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

People opening 8 hour long music videos, then pausing them after half an hour and just keeping it open while they do something else.

Then they come back after multiple hours and just close the browser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points

Letting the entire video buffer is the same as downloading the entire video which you can still do. My favourite tool is yt-dlp

permalink
report
reply
34 points

It’s a pretty great tool. Downloaded the entirety of Murder Drones on Saturday to add to my Plex server. Strictly for preservation, going to re-watch on YouTube to support them

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

You can also setup a script to automatically download a channels latest vid so you don’t need to check the website anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

fun fact: according to sponsorblock, youtube is testing ads that are baked serverside into the video. so one day even downloading might not be ad free

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They will never be able to block me just using the mouse to skip forward. If its already downloaded theres zero buffer lag.

I will create another step that converts the format to an open one if they somehow block that too.

Its an accessibility thing for me. Ads literally cause me harm. They cannot possibly win me over i’ll just end up doing something productive instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For now you can use vpns to certain countries that don’t have ads at all, I expect that will still work to avoid server side ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Download the video twice and only play the common parts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It will be detectable as per US law. Ads must be marked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Beat me to it (by several hours).

I’m not watching on YouTube. If I want to watch, I’ll download it first. yt-dlp on the desktop, seal (yt-dlp underneath) on android.

Edit: Big finger problems

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wow, Seal is very much improved since I last looked at it. It has a million options, and custom commands and everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I remember when we were still on dial-up and I found a youtube video I wanted to show my brother, I’d let it buffer and load and have to keep the pc on the entire day until he got home from work.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Realmedia has entered the chat

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Uggghhhh

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Modern ABRs are actually quite sophisticated, and in most cases you’re unlikely to notice the forward buffer limit. Unstable connection scenarios are going to be the exception where it breaks down.

For best user experience it’s of course good practice to offer media offlining alongside on demand, but some platforms consider it a money-making opportunity to gate this behind a subscription fee.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

My internet is intermittently like 100mbps and 256kbps. It sees the 100mbps and acts like it’s going to be that way forever, so doesn’t buffer the whole video while it has the fast speed, then drops entirely when it slows down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

An ABR is generally going to make an estimate based on observed bandwidth and select an appropriate bitrate for that. It’s not out of the question that you run out of forward buffer when your bandwidth takes a nosedive, because the high bitrate video is heavy as all hell and the ABR needs to have observed the drop in bandwidth before it reconsiders and selects a lower bitrate track.

I’m not familiar with ABRs affecting the size of the forward buffer, most commonly these are tweaked based on the type of use-case and scaled in seconds of media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And then there is youtube which just discards the whole buffer content each time an ad plays. Very sophisticated. Although knowing google that behavoir is likely on purpose

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve been running adblockers since the beginning of time so I can’t speak to this behavior. Spontaneously it seems a bit amateurish, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If that were true then users wouldn’t hate and complain about it. This post existing is proof that it’s shit because clearly it’s not as seamless as you’re making it out to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The thing is that you can’t notice when it’s working on account of how seamless it is. Yes, sometimes it breaks down, but these are the exceptional cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 47K

    Comments