Donald Trump has been accused of violating federal law by allegedly calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss the ceasefire deal the U.S. is helping negotiate between Israel and Hamas.

The former president allegedly made the call on August 14, according to Axios, which cited two unnamed “U.S. sources who were briefed on the call.”

If Trump did make the call, he would potentially be breaking the law as the Logan Act, enacted in 1799, prohibits unauthorized private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the U.S.

American Muckrakers, an organization that states it seeks to hold politicians and officials accountable, has filed a request with the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State.

235 points

Republicans and ratfucking peace talks during an inhumane war of territorial expansion to make their political opponent look bad. Name a more iconic duo.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

That’s completely unfair, you couldn’t name one two seven…let’s go with seven other examples of that!

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m pretty sure Bush junior could fulfill your list all by himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m pretty sure he couldn’t name all the countries he invaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nixon and the the Chennault Affair to sabotage peace talks with Veitnam

permalink
report
parent
reply
188 points

Until I see a picture of Trump behind bars I will continue to assume he will continue to get away with everything forever.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

The only truthful thing he has ever said was “I could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose supporters.”

Implied is that he also wouldn’t get arrested for it.

Tie his bullshit with the recent articles about the pathetic FBI being afraid to go after Republican domestic terrorists and it’s just beyond absurd. “Home of the brave” my ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Worth pointing out how much this is also a republican thing. Nixon did it. Reagan pretty much did the same to sour Carter.

H.W. Bush agreed.(?) The world shrugged…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I believed for a couple of months that the us justice system wasn’t completely compromised, but I was stupid to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah convicted, sentance, and in prison are very different states of things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

People said he wouldn’t be prosecuted, and he was.

People said he wouldn’t get indicted, and he was.

People said he wouldn’t get convicted, and he was.

Now we’re waiting on sentencing and carrying out that sentence, and people say that won’t happen, either.

The justice system is slow, especially at the federal level. Some of that is due to deliberation, some of that is due to federal judges having too high of a case load, and some of that is due to the fact that Trump is a former President, and prosecutors and judges have to handle that very carefully. If acquitted, that’s it, prosecutors rarely have grounds for appeal. They need to walk into the court room with an airtight case.

If you follow other federal cases, this kind of timeline is completely expected.

Except for Judge Cannon. She’s just blatantly pulling things in Trump’s favor. The rest are doing their job. Edit: oh, and the Supreme Court, of course. They just fucked a lot of things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Except for Judge Cannon (…) Edit: oh, and the Supreme Court, of course.

So what I’m hearing is… he’s getting away with everything forever?

Look on a more serious note, I do think if he fails to become president again his luck probably has run out. The bad news is, between winning legitimately and stealing the election through House vote, Trump still is probably odds even to become president again - if not better.

I know there is a chance sentencing and carrying out of it happens before the election, but I’ll believe it when I see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Dude he’s always going to get away with it, he eats like shit and he’ll be dead soon anyway. The important thing is to implicate his conspirators that will be around for decades longer doing more fucked up shit in the background.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nah, that could be AI generated. I won’t know it’s real until his first instinct is to immediately say that it should have been Hillary behind bars in a video clip, then I’ll know it’s really him

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m wondering what we’ll see first. Him passing of old age or him facing any consequence for his illegal actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When you’re an asshole, the Democrats and Republicans let you get away with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

If the USA had the balls to enforce the laws as they have in the past this idiot would be executed for treason. Turns out fascism is a great tool you can use to avoid consequences as the State shudders at the terrorist following you’ve gathered and refuses to take action.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

Dear right-wing dipshits who like to use the name Genocide Joe. Your orange turd wanna be emperor is actively sabotaging ceasefires and potential peace of said-genocide just to make current administration look bad. Donnie Death

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Right wingers don’t call him Genocide Joe, they LOVE the Palestinian deaths. It’s the “he’s not far enough left” people like .ml folks who use the name Genocide Joe

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Of course a mask off MAGA will say not enough people are being killed. But what’s the difference between what a farthest left .ml leftist would write and what a MAGA cosplaying as a leftist would write? Genuinely curious how to tell them apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They’re generally the same picture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They actually want to put MAGA against the wall. I think that’s the most salient difference in regards to revolutionary vanguard communists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

they call him Genocide Joe if they think it will bother the liberal they’re speaking to. if they think it will hurt their enemy, they do not require something they say to align with their principles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

The man literally stood three feet away from Putin, and bent the knee. Live, on television.

The man invited Russian operatives into the White house months into his term, and kicked out his entire staff so the meeting would not be recorded, and has admitted to giving them all sorts of information.

He received exactly zero punishment for that. He was never even investigated for that. And then there’s the Ukraine situation, which again…he received exactly zero punishment for.

There’s no reason to believe this will go anywhere either. Multiple levels of the US court system, up to and including the Supreme Court, have not only shown that Donald Trump gets a different system of justice than most people, but they have no appetite for holding Trump to account at all.

We need to pass a law that says that a judge must recuse himself if the case involves the person who appointed them, or someone with a relationship to that person. And this includes everything from the 3 stooges at the Supreme Court that constantly interfere on Trump’s behalf every time he’s in legal jeopardy to Kentaji Brown Jackson recusing herself if the Supreme Court hears a case about something that Biden signed into law. This is 2024. It would take me about 5 minutes to come up with some code that would randomly assign a judge to a case while also ensuring that someone involved in the case isn’t the person who appointed them. And my coding skills are about 20 years out of date.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 163K

    Comments