This dude is on a one man quest to promote third parties on Lemmy, and the crazy thing to me is how generally non combative and polite they are. It seems like rage bait and every one of their posts gets massive down votes but then you see their comments are all like "well I respect your opinion but I disagree’… I really can’t tell if this is just a master level troll or some deep cover Russian op.
This dude is on a one man quest to promote third parties on Lemmy,
So do you think we need even more articles on the awesomeness of the Democratic Party?
and the crazy thing to me is how generally non combative and polite they are.
So I should be more rude?
I really can’t tell if this is just a master level troll or some deep cover Russian op.
OR it could just be that I belive in third parties. I don’t write the articles, I just post them. I respect your opinion, but if you feel any of my articles have broken community rules, please bring to attention fo the mod team.
Okay so hear me out on this since you seem to care about third parties… I think if you legit have the objective of getting 3rd parties included long term you need to support ones that have down ballot options, the greens very rarely do but LIbertarians almost always have at least someone for governor or senate or at state levels, so while i don’t actually think Libertarians are the better option (Althought i’d rank them above Republicans), I think if you want to support the general idea of 3rd parties, the most pragmatic choice is to support libertarians. This WAS my strategy for elections I didnt care about till 2016 (i’m in a solid blue state which also plays in, I’d vote different if i wasnt).
Maybe its because I’m older, or maybe its actually just the legitimate threat of fascism, but after Trump won his first term I switched to pretty much fully supporting democrats. I’ll probably still vote third party for future elections that i think don’t matter but I consider the people behind Trump too big of a risk at this point. I think defeating Trump would actually also help Third parties in a sort of way because if he wins everyone will fall in line behind him but if he loses there will likely be a pretty big rift among the right and some portion of them are going to move to the Libertarian party.
While I’m probably more ideologically aligned with the platform of the green party, I dont think they have any realistic chance of making a positive difference. They seem to not really have great leadership or enough support to run down ballot candidates. It will be interesting to see if RFK or Cornell West do worse then Stein but I kind of doubt it
Honestly though, with biden dropping out and walz getting picket for VP, I’m genuinely optimistic about the democratic ticket now, sure they arent perfect and they will need to be under constant pressure from the left to do the right things, but personally they’ve earned my vote at this point.
Anyways, I hope you don’t get banned, I’m really curious to see what you post AFTER the election is over.
Okay so hear me out on this since you seem to care about third parties… I think if you legit have the objective of getting 3rd parties included long term you need to support ones that have down ballot options
Well I’m not going to vote for someone JUST because they are third party. They have to align with my values. The libertarians don’t align with my values, so I’m not voting for them. And the same reason I am not voting for Harris. And the same reason I am not voting for Trump.
but after Trump won his first term I switched to pretty much fully supporting democrats.
And I support and respect your choice to do that and vote for whoever you want. As I would hope you would support and respect me voting for who I would like to vote for.
Anyways, I hope you don’t get banned, I’m really curious to see what you post AFTER the election is over.
Why would I get banned? I’ve posted a few political news articles to this Lemmy political news community. And the mods have not removed them. Why? Because they fit in with the “political news” theme of this community. Why do you think I would get banned for that?
Honest question: Do you think I only post to c/politics and that I only post political articles?!
I’ve also posted education articles to Lemmy education communities, science articles to Lemmy science communities, paraprofessional articles to Lemmy paraprofessional communities.
And friend, I am older than you. I have posted about third parties and other political news to Reddit for several years before I even found Lemmy. What makes you think I am doing this for one election and then done? I also vote for Green Party members in non-presidential elections, and cover that news as well.
I have been voting since Michael Dukakis (Democratic Party) and his running mate Lloyd Bentsen ran for president in 1988.
I know that doesn’t fit your “OMG Look guys! I caught a Russian agent!!” Or the other bad guys “a China agent!!”
Why don’t you count how many third party articles are in this community, compared to pro-democrat articles in this community.
Just because I am not voting for your candidate, doesn’t mean I am part of some grand conspiracy. It’s extremely uncivil to imply that I am a russian plant. Or that I am a troll.
Also, there are lots of people interested in third parties. Hence why you all are so scared of third parties. Are they all russian plants too? What about the people who voted thrid party before the Russian Scare took over?
And lastly, this is important, I DIDN’T WRITE THE FUCKING NEWS ARTICLES!
Do you understand that? They are not some opinion pieces that I came up with. They are articles written by news organizations. If you don’t think news orgs should cover third parties, then write to them and let them know your opinion.
If you have a problem with the content of an article, please write to the editor of that news org.
If you think any of the articles I have posted don’t fit the “political news” theme of this community, then contact the mod team.
I don’t see any reason to think it isn’t genuine. I’ve met plenty of people who feel this way.
But either way they must have incredible patience to deal with all the abuse they receive!
You can tell when you engage and ask questions that require actual thought. Bring up the fact that many third party candidates have been shown to literally be in the race to confuse voters or pull votes away from other candidates, and they no longer want to engage, attempting to steer the conversation away from that topic.
The fact that they won’t even acknowledge it happens, which is an objective fact, is proof enough for me to believe that’s what they are attempting.
Bring up the fact that many third party candidates have been shown to literally be in the race to confuse voters or pull votes away from other candidates
So if that’s true, then Libertarian Party (which is the party in the article I posted for this thread) would draw voters AWAY from Trump. Which would actually help Harris.
So are you upset that I posted an article about a party that would actually help Harris and work against Trump?
I’ve also posted about other parties that, according to your logic, would take votes away from Trump.
I’m confused about why you would be mad that I posted an article that is anti-Trump.
So are you pro-Trump then?
You should see my DM’s! These public ones are bad enough, but oy! The private ones are borderline creepy. Tho the guy who keeps insisting every day that I am getting paid in “russian bitcoins” and that I live in a mansion with Putin is funny. Crazy, but funny.
So it’s not so much patience, its that I just don’t take any of it personal.
What’s even more fascinating to me tho, is the amount of anger I get for posting a news article about a third party. It’s not like I write the articles. And it’s not like this sub is ONLY for pro democrat articles.
I post about libertarian stuff and the trump gang gets mad at me and calls me names. I post green party stuff, and the Harris gang gets mad at me, and calls me names.
I will have to say the Democrat people actually get more mad at me than the republicans, tho. Which I was def not counting on.
Absolutely rage bait. Imo the language might read as non combative, but in application it feels like just a blind to slip a ban. Read through some of their exchanges with Mx. SMCF; it’s pointing a hand in somebody’s face and using the ‘I’m not touching you’ of defenses.
I get hateful remarks every day. And I try to remain civil. It’s not really any deeper than that.
I post articles about libertarian issues and green party issues. So people from both sides of the debate are pretty mad about it.
But note, I didn’t write the news articles. If anyone has a problem with the content, they can bring it up with the authors/editors of the news articles. I just post what I see.
I think everyone who was going to vote for trump but is feeling doubt should pick a third party candidate to vote for instead.
And I think everyone should vote for who they feel best aligns with their personal values. Regardless of party affiliation.
People should do what they think is best, based on their own situation (region, district, needs, etc) and beliefs(what they think should happen, what they can ethically stand, etc). In this election, I think Trump is a dangerous (personally and politically) and incompetent enough figure that conservative people should deliberately throw the election to force their party in a different direction.
My personal belief is that government is a tool, and my vote will go to the person who seems most likely to enact policy that aligns with my values.
and my vote will go to the person who seems most likely to enact policy that aligns with my values.
I totally agree.
Harris is not the one that does that for me so I won’t be voting for her, but everyone should def pick the person that aligns with their values.
Libertarians are just awful Republicans. It doesn’t hurt them any to have you throw your vote away.
Voting your ethics is what the primary is for. Voting strategically is what the final vote is for.
Voting your ethics is what the primary is for. Voting strategically is what the final vote is for.
For me personally, I vote ethics at both times.
But I respect and support your viewpoint for sure.
Is it ethical to cast a third party vote that lets the least ethical candidate with the election? It seems to me that such a decision undermines the point of ethics. Sometimes a compromise is the most ethical thing to do.
Is it ethical to cast a third party vote that lets the least ethical candidate with the election? It seems to me that such a decision undermines the point of ethics. Sometimes a compromise is the most ethical thing to do.
Voting is an expression of personal values, and supporting a third-party candidate is a way to advocate for those values, even if the candidate doesn’t have a great chance of winning.
Your argument that voting third-party may lead to the least ethical candidate winning, assumes that people should always choose the lesser of two evils, which perpetuates a system that doesn’t align with their beliefs.
I personally think that in the long run, continually compromising on ethics by voting for one of the two major parties will delay development of alternatives that represent what I believe in.
By voting third-party, I’m contributing to a broader political conversation that challenges the status quo and pushes for meaningful change. And I am voting for what I believe in. Which, we as Americans, have the right to do. Even if it’s not the candidate you wish I were voting for.
So no, I won’t be compromising.
UNLESS a socialist party gets on my ballot. Then I’d switch from Green to Socialist.
You’ve made a series of very poor choices to end up as a libertarian VP nominee.
He should be considering rehab, not explaining things to people.
