31 points

Voting your ethics is what the primary is for. Voting strategically is what the final vote is for.

permalink
report
reply
-23 points

Voting your ethics is what the primary is for. Voting strategically is what the final vote is for.

For me personally, I vote ethics at both times.

But I respect and support your viewpoint for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Is it ethical to cast a third party vote that lets the least ethical candidate with the election? It seems to me that such a decision undermines the point of ethics. Sometimes a compromise is the most ethical thing to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points
*

Is it ethical to cast a third party vote that lets the least ethical candidate with the election? It seems to me that such a decision undermines the point of ethics. Sometimes a compromise is the most ethical thing to do.

Voting is an expression of personal values, and supporting a third-party candidate is a way to advocate for those values, even if the candidate doesn’t have a great chance of winning.

Your argument that voting third-party may lead to the least ethical candidate winning, assumes that people should always choose the lesser of two evils, which perpetuates a system that doesn’t align with their beliefs.

I personally think that in the long run, continually compromising on ethics by voting for one of the two major parties will delay development of alternatives that represent what I believe in.

By voting third-party, I’m contributing to a broader political conversation that challenges the status quo and pushes for meaningful change. And I am voting for what I believe in. Which, we as Americans, have the right to do. Even if it’s not the candidate you wish I were voting for.

So no, I won’t be compromising.

UNLESS a socialist party gets on my ballot. Then I’d switch from Green to Socialist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Libertarians are just awful Republicans. It doesn’t hurt them any to have you throw your vote away.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I think everyone who was going to vote for trump but is feeling doubt should pick a third party candidate to vote for instead.

permalink
report
reply
-12 points

And I think everyone should vote for who they feel best aligns with their personal values. Regardless of party affiliation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

People should do what they think is best, based on their own situation (region, district, needs, etc) and beliefs(what they think should happen, what they can ethically stand, etc). In this election, I think Trump is a dangerous (personally and politically) and incompetent enough figure that conservative people should deliberately throw the election to force their party in a different direction.

My personal belief is that government is a tool, and my vote will go to the person who seems most likely to enact policy that aligns with my values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

and my vote will go to the person who seems most likely to enact policy that aligns with my values.

I totally agree.

Harris is not the one that does that for me so I won’t be voting for her, but everyone should def pick the person that aligns with their values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You’ve made a series of very poor choices to end up as a libertarian VP nominee.

He should be considering rehab, not explaining things to people.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I thought we were Green party, here. Libertarians? Ethics?

What’s the plan, friend?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

OP is a Mormon Satanist. Transracial Kopimist Monk. Socialist Workers Party Green Comrade. Alcohol-free, drug-free, caffeine-free, woke-free, influencer-free, uncensored (free!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You say Satanist like it’s a bad thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I just get confused how you practice mormon satanism.

Do they have pentagrams on their temple garments?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Green Party is for nerds.

Libertarians listen to Winger and smoke ditchweed pinners. They’re the cool guys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

I upvoted purely for the Winger comment. Hilarious!

I’m def the nerd Green guy; I don’t even know what ditchweed pinners are, but I’m assuming weed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

What’s the plan, friend?

That’s the mistake several posters have made about me. There is no “plan.”

I read interesting political news, and I post it to this Lemmy political news community. I’ve also posted Socialist articles too.

I am Green (tho lean more socialist), but that’s not the only political news I read, nor is it the only political news stuff I post.

This sub gets plenty of pro-democrat articles. Having a little diversity is good.

Having said that, I expect many replies saying that I’m really a Trumper, that I’m posting things to spoil the election, etc.

But before people lose their shit and start saying that, Libertarian party voters usually take away Trump votes; NOT democrat votes, if they wanna play the “spoiler!” game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Upfront: I assure you no shit is about to be lost. I’m all up chill with myself.

My feed default sort is New, so when you’re posting you dominate my feed. I’ve come to expect Green posts. The Libertarian post was off color for you. Just thought I’d ask.

So you got no plan. Cool, cool. Interesting articles. Got it.

Do your thing. I’m around, I see you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments