In a lengthy report released on the first day of the Democratic National Convention, Republicans used circumstantial evidence to accuse the president of corruption tied to his son’s foreign business dealings.

House Republicans on Monday formally made the case for impeaching President Biden, releasing a lengthy report accusing him of corruption and seeking to allow his family to profit off his office in connection with foreign business deals made by his son Hunter, who has been charged with felony tax crimes.

In the 291-page document, released on the day that Democrats gather in Chicago to begin their party convention, Republicans call Mr. Biden’s conduct “egregious” and say he should be impeached for abuse of power and obstruction. But the report contains no proof that Mr. Biden, when he was vice president, engaged in any corrupt quid pro quo to benefit his son’s business partners, and Republicans admit they have no direct evidence that he ordered any interference into a Justice Department investigation into Hunter Biden.

112 points

They’ve been saying they’ll use impeachment as both a political weapon against their enemies and as a defense to their own crimes.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Impeach our guy for actual acts he did? Fuck you, well just SAY your guy did stuff.

Check and MATE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Republicans used impeachment as a weapon in the 90s against Clinton, so they are just confirming they will continue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Republicans also stole the election in 2000 - they will continue. Republicans are weird that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Tbf, what he did was wrong and he lied about it under oath. While it may have been petty, it’s still more than they’ve got on Joe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think it backfired in Clinton’s case. “Impeached over a blowjob”, turned into more of a joke than a conviction. All that sound and fury, and Bill came out looking put upon rather than a villain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Explain what was so wrong about sexual relations between two consenting adults. Also, ever have your car followed by a relentless and determined cop?

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Ok, maybe I am OOTL but didn’t they try this already? And when questioned no one could find faults with his dealings?

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Yes, but they also had like a dozen Benghazi investigations that never uncovered anything becsuse being wrong has any bearing on Republican actions. They know it is bullshit, but think it will rile up their base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Not just rile up their base but also sow discord and distrust among democrats, independents and undecideds. Though this is admittedly less effective when Biden himself isn’t running anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They just wanna make Kamala President early, it’s fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh for sure! I just wasn’t sure if this was a continuation of their previous attempt, or something new all together!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

They’ve been trying since the Jan 6th insurrection failure and so far all that’s come up is Republican congresspeople getting duped by foreign agents.

Still waiting for James Comer’s apology and resignation

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-joe-biden-fbi-informant-ec37a35b808ffedf257bb3cfb3fc9ce2

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Don’t hold your breath lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

That SETTLES it! I’m NOT voting for Biden this Election ANYMORE!

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Strictly a coincidence that it was released on Day 1 of the Democratic Convention. I can’t believe it. How crazy is that?

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Republicans opportunistic timing really undersells their seriousness.

That, and the lack of evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

When was the last time they were serious? The early 90’s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If you were to ask him, they are always deadly serious. But yeah I agree with you, feels like the '90s was the last time you could take anything they said as legitimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

“It is not necessary for the House of Representatives to show that the dealings involved a quid pro quo to rise to the level of an impeachable offense.”

You wrote 291 pages and admit, in the document, that you don’t make your point?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

GOP: Your honor, we declare the accused GUILTY of all these crimes.

Judge: and what evidence do you have?

GOP: NONE BUT WE CAN YELL IT REALLY LOUD.

Judge: and what do you have to say Biden?

Biden lawyers: WE CAN YELL NOT GUILTY EVEN LOUDER!

Judge: that was definitely louder, I declare him not guilty!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 110K

    Comments