29 points
-29 points
30 points

This Newsweek article simply presents her official campaign statement, of giving a speech about peace, to a country run by a dictator that was already helping Assad massacre his own people in Syria. It also mentions a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, but neglects to mention she never cooperated with that investigation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Wait - so her saying she’s not a Russian asset doesn’t mean she’s not a Russian asset?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Could she BE any more of a Russian asset?!?

permalink
report
reply
-30 points

She’s not a Russian asset though. Bye the way, memes of this nature are against this Lemmy community’s rules. Please keep the comments civil and avoid mocking. Thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Attacking the subject of an article is not against the community rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Thank you for the clarification! I thought putting joke memes in the replies were. Ugh! All the opportunites I have missed! Thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Crazy how she keeps popping up in presidential elections and never attempted a senate run or a house run.

Anyway, she eats dinner with traitors and war crime speed runners. Enemies of democracy tend to do that

permalink
report
reply
-15 points
*

This has been looked into: https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-ties-vladimir-putin-explained-1842620

Oh, and also, I don’t care. I’m still voting for her. I respect and support your right to vote for whoever you want to as well. Thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That article just says that the Stein campaign denies it. There’s no substantive investigation documented here, just statements from Stein and the campaign itself. This is just a denial, not a debunking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

It was investigated and they found no wrongdoing. Do you not think that the democrats would have thrown lots of money into finding out if it were true or not?! lmao

If you have proof, please send to the democratic party and the news orgs. That would be front page news and would decimate the green party! So what is your proof? Share it here too please!

Because people with way more money than you or I have, have already looked into it. And they found nothing. So please please please release your proof to the world!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

She’s almost the same age as Trump!

permalink
report
reply
6 points

All of her first days tasks are things that without support from Congress would break down pretty quickly unfortunately. Take the border stuff, Biden has tried to get funding for more agents to alleviate congestion, and The House has killed any attempt.

I’d love to see the green party show up in the house or the Senate, get a base going.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

That’s how they should be starting. Get candidates in the state legislatures and local offices. Instead, she is insisting on getting on ballots states like Wisconsin where she has no electors because the Greens don’t have anyone in a state office who is eligible to nominate electors for the party. Even if she were to win in Wisconsin, she wouldn’t get the votes in the electoral collage because she has no electors. The only effect she can have is to again steal enough votes from the Democratic candidate to let Trump win the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

I’d love to see the green party show up in the house or the Senate, get a base going.

I agree. And I hope they start focusing on that from now on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

So, uh, why doesn’t Jill run for house or Senate? You know, places that she might actually be able to get into a position of power and not be a joke of a spoiler candidate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

So, uh, why doesn’t Jill run for house or Senate?

I don’t know her personally, so that would be something you would have to ask her. I’d like to see her do that as well.

But I personally don’t think she’s a “joke of a spoiler candidate.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I refuse to support the greens for ANYTHING until they do so (and ditch Stein, she’s failed more times running for president than anything else).

Until then, they’re a joke that gets rolled out every 4 years for us to laugh at, a long with their supporters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

The Green Party has fielded candidates for both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives in various elections over the years, but none have won a seat in Congress.

Green Party candidates have occasionally garnered significant attention and votes, but they have not been successful in winning federal office due to the challenges third parties face in the U.S. political system, including limited visibility, funding, and the dominance of the two major parties.

They have had some local successes in other parts of the country, such as winning seats in local government or state legislatures. Californians have elected 55 of the 226 office-holding Greens nationwide. Other states with high numbers of Green elected officials include Pennsylvania (31), Wisconsin (23), Massachusetts (18) and Maine (17). Maine has the highest per capita number of Green elected officials in the country and the largest Green registration percentage with more than 29,273 Greens comprising 2.95% of the electorate as of November 2006.[68] Madison, Wisconsin is the city with the most Green elected officials (8), followed by Portland, Maine (7).

Now having said that, I 100 percent respect and support you voting for whoever you want in the elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments