-8 points
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/17/jd-vance-women

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Referring to women as females will do that all on its own.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

The only voters not repelled by his creepy views are… well… creeps.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

JD Vance puts his futon in his mouth again

quality

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

Seriously though I fucking LOVE that the heterosectional trolling has not only gained a life of its own, but that were starting to see a lot of journalists slip in oblique references to it in tangentially related content. It must be driving Vance INSANE, and I love that for him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ll check with the 'necks at work, but I don’t think anyone actually gives a shit. I’m not sure it’s doing any favors for the dems.

Between couches and jars of jizz, I’d support Biden pointing our nuclear arsenal at our own cities and going ham. Motherfuckers can’t even bother saying each other’s names. It’s over. Time to go, lads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Id say we had a good run, but we absolutely have not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

this wouldn’t have worked if he didn’t look exactly like the kind of guy who would do it (which is why their weirdo “horse cum” rumor attempt didn’t work on walz), and it wouldn’t stay relevant if it didn’t so visibly bother him so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

The Ferengi accent isn’t helping. “Feeeemayles”

permalink
report
reply
22 points

So that Roswell Episode was actually real. There are Ferengi amongus in our midst.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments