145 points

“State-sanctioned GF”

But then how will they ever get recruits for the Navy?

permalink
report
reply
129 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Jokes on them, I’m on land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Ok pal

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Shipmate you gotta study more recce

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

State-sanctioned cat-boys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Morale liaison

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Girlfriend is for on land only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

either the navy becomes full of lesbians or they’ll hand out state bf

permalink
report
parent
reply

Recruits don’t have to start gay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

time to hodl untill state gf

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Yeah, that’s actually the least dumb one after a stable job. Everyone wants money, status and love. Even pride in your nation can be cringe, depending on how justified that pride actually is.

Of course, women are not objects, so I’m unclear how they would pull handing them out off… It’s going to be a robot RealDoll thing, isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They could probably get girls signing up if they posted ads saying that they’re looking for stay at home girlfriends/boipussy for servicemen. Lots of states with no easy way to escape have desperate people unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, but you can already dependa without government help. I guess just a sugardaddy-style dating site run by the DoD, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well let me tell you, the market is already taking care of this need. There is a long established tradition in the US military of partners for our servicepeople being stay at home people. I have witnessed people get divorced from one enlisted person and marry another within a short time span. I’m not assigning moral value to this set of actions, but I think the gf from the state meme kind of already exists, but it’s implicit. Making that some form of guarantee would be pretty heinous in my opinion because it would be likely to break the assortative mating that we humans are so fond of (we sort into mating categories for absolutely good reason). The power to date/mate outside of your league is typically reserved for higher-ups in power hierarchies. The tantalizing promise that the underlings in these hierarchies can get that power is one of the main lures ised to get people to support fascism. I think the logic goes: If the boss has all the power in the world and needs me, the common goon, to secure that power, then the boss is likely to toss a few crumbs of power to me. I might be able to date outside of my league, one or two rungs. I can stand the boss breaking the natural order because I’m assuming that I will get to one day be the boss or I will be rewarded by the boss with some power. I went to Dubai and visited the big water park there. The population there is heavily stratified. The couple makeup was almost exclusively what I would describe as fat guys with supermodel wives. It breaks the assortative mating that makes up the natural order. I would suggest to anyone thinking that state-sponsored-girlfriends shoulds like a good idea ask if you yourself would like to date under your league without corersion. If not, then any dating arrangement other than the normal one is immoral. And now for some unsolicited some dating advice: the best way to date out of your league is to move up out of your league by cultivating yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Free healthcare and commissary access already causes marriages. A defined length contract wouldn’t be the worst thing in human history. But I’m not sure it’s up to modern ethical standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If you can’t leave early, yeah it wouldn’t be. If you can I don’t really see what that adds.

Arguably legal marriages that are hard and expensive to leave are anachronistic themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Even pride in your nation can be cringe, depending on how justified that pride actually is.

As a German who was raised long after WW2 let me just say that pretty much all pride in your nation is pretty cringe, no matter how justified. The one exception would be maybe if you had a major part in improving your nation personally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Hmm. Should I be proud my nation accepts more immigrants than anybody else? If we stopped, I’d stop being proud, so the way I’ve thought of it that doesn’t make me a nationalist. I certainly don’t want to be a nationalist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Define status. All work has value. A janitor is just as important as a nurse or software developer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t disagree, but hoo boy so do most human beings - especially in the modern West where we have a ghost story called meritocracy. Your example tells me you see it too, so I’ll skip the awkward attempt at nailing it down with a definition.

Actually, I do disagree a bit. I wish people took me seriously IRL. I don’t need anything more than that though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I disagree.

It doesn’t really matter whether you have a Janitor available every day or just one day every week.

But you will really notice if you have a surgeon available every day or just one day of the week.

Please note that I explicitly don’t have the opinion that janitors aren’t important. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t exist and noone would pay for them.

But saying that they are just as important as a surgeon just simply isn’t true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ll settle for Kerfus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The Polish grocery mascot? That’s what I get searching that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Roomba in the streets, predator drone in the sheets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They already do that, but the gf’s name is always Jody. Who do you think writes all those Dear John letters?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Which state though? I hope North Dakota, those cold weather women love to cuddle

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Idk, wojak ads sound pretty appealing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Where’s the FPS game?

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*

Been done, and didn’t work. Players complained of “Slow weapon upgrades” and “No character progression” and was received poorly, needs more gritty realism.

Or explosions

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What’s funny is I know someone with like, 2000 hours in that game. And it just happened to be his favorite fps, nothing to do with the army propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s honestly a solid lane shooter FPS, but it falls flat of the Battlefield killer it could have been. Enough realism and no respawns to make you treat it seriously, but it’s also not ArmA levels of “welp, time to respawn and drive/walk to the objective for 15 minutes”

Plus doing the training unlocks the squad role slots for online play, get that season pass shit outta my face

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s well balanced, has great level design, and the game mood is serious enough that the scenarios and matches are taken serious too. It’s rare to have someone run in guns blazing for more than a couple matches. Overall, it has a fun gameplay loop that takes itself seriously without being over the top. They know it’s a recruiting tool, so it has to be good enough that folks want to play.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

AA2 and AA3 were fucking fantastic, despite AA3 becoming early access abandonware within like ten seconds of its release. AA4 was awful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I heard they had to limit people at West Point from playing as all the cadets were learning to shoot first and ask questions later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Some units did use it as a training tool, but only in conjunction with actual classes and closed matches. So wacky game stuff was very much not allowed. You had to move and fight as a team. For what it’s worth, when I organized some guys to work like a real fireteam the game massively rewarded it in public matches.

For shoot/don’t shoot training without a designated training area (the infamous back 40 of most bases) the Army uses a laser system with compressed air guns. A video plays and you’re expected to interact with it like you would in real life. So there’s a trainer there noting the exact moment you went lethal, if you did the correct de-escalation before hand, and your marksmanship after you start shooting. The scenarios also have branching possibilities so you can’t just recognize which one is which. You actually have to work the problem and hope for the best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

From my experience trying it out they should have made sure no-one had any grenades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They made the most realistic game and people complained it wasn’t real enough. I will never forget that. And the slow weapon upgrades was because there weren’t any originally. Then you had to complete a stealth mission with one possible path that you had to crawl through for an hour. And the weapons weren’t available on every map.

In many ways the game proved we didn’t want super realism. We wanted fake realism with tactical fashion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I enjoy a good FPS, even military sim styles like Battlefield, but that also why I wouldn’t join the real military. I enjoy it as a game, a fantasy where none actually get physical injured and everyone goes home at the end of a battle. I’ve seen enough “video game” violence to know I have zero desire to see the real thing or do such things to other people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Battlefield isn’t a milsim. Aside from the few milsim communites that have existed over the years and mods like Project Reality, Battlefield games were never really the most realistc deptiction of warfare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Think it belongs before or after the Dodge Charger?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Before. America’s Army dropped for the PC in ‘02. I feel like grunts were getting chargers from like 06-current. Could be wrong though

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Dodge charger

clearly not a dodge charger

Is this subtext meme or is NCD just extra not credible today?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

That’s not a Dodge Charger? Is it a Dodge, though? I’m not good on my car politics

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It is the similarly named but starkly different ‘dodge challenger’

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Cars aren’t really our strong point, just look at all the “Toyota Hilux” memes, where the vehicle is actually a 70 series cruiser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

But that’s a Challenger.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To be fair if you’ve seen a charger and a challenger before, you’d be able to tell pretty quick. My brain interprets it is charger built like matchbox; challenger like hot wheels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yup, there’s a reason that particular campaign didn’t work out.

permalink
report
parent
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments