25 points

I don’t want to see anybody get hurt. Those North Koreans should maybe just stay home.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

A month from now: entire North Korean brigade defects to Ukraine in exchange for extra helpings of borscht

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Shit they will probably defect for a regular serving of Borscht

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And plov!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, they defect and they get theirs entire families moved to concentration camps… if they even get that far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That is likely the only way they don’t all just walk away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Borscht is fucking amazing, and I would defect to Ukraine for regular servings of it.

Not really, but I do love well-made borscht.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

🤔

I mean I don’t want them to fight, but I’m pretty sure they’re not safe home either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The Ukrainians should just fire back with delicious food and free visas for defectors.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

You joke, but i bet that it would be at least somewhat effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Update: South Korea says it will send actual, meaningful numbers of troops into Pyongyang within thirty-one days, bringing a formal end to conflict on the Korean Peninsula.

/s but you know they’re thinking about it.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Doesn’t NK have one of the biggest standing armies in the world? I figured they could toss some troops into the blender and not care.

Also doesn’t NK have a nuke? They’d definitely detonate one if they were invaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

do they have a nuke that works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Only when crashing into the ocean, thousands of miles short of its target

Edit: seriously, though, it’s pretty clear that they can build nuclear warheads (how many and what size is unclear), but their problem is getting the bomb to its target.

Rocketry is hard. It’s uber-expensive, and it requires a great deal of trial-and-error. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had gotten data, etc, from Russia and China like some guidance (or even rocket plans), but NK’s best physicists and aerospace engineers are both: not that great, and working entirely alone with a budget that is a minuscule fraction of anyone else who has tried this.

They’ve been trying to launch an ICBM successfully for almost 2 decades. They haven’t had much success yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only one way to find out!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do believe their nuke works. I do not believe their delivery system works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do feel guilty but that is what I wish would happen. Mostly for the sake of the people of NK. But some people would die on both sides…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Does this count as a world war yet?

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Its possible the keg is done being packed and we’re watching the fuse dwindle

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Do we know the locations of all Austro-Hungarian princes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

My bets have been on Taiwan being the flashpoint for well over a year now. Standing firm.

And my bet is and has been “before Christmas of 2024.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Especially if there’s “voting irregularities” or Trump wins outright. The Chinese would definitely take advantage of the confusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I thought about that for a long time, and, honestly, it seems that Russia may have stolen China’s thunder there by invading Ukraine. As a result, the whole world (mostly) super-hates and has united against Russia with untold billions of weapons and aid to Ukraine.

What’s China to think of their Taiwan plan, now? Well, I think it’s obvious by watching what they’re doing, what they’ve been doing.

Although they’ve become more aggressive in the South China Sea, what with building all their fake islands and atolls in order to claim some sovereignty to the waters. But most of what they’re doing merely amounts to harassment and bullying of surrounding nations. And while there’s been a good amount of somewhat-incendiary talk re: China’s intentions towards Taiwan, they’ve actually done very little to accomplish that goal, as of late. They’re being careful, weighing their options, and proceeding slowly but surely.

Will Taiwan become the next place invaded? A new flashpoint? I don’t think so, or, at least, not for a while. The Ukraine War, Russia’s almost-collapsed economy, and their need for aid of all kinds has put China into an uncomfortable position, and they seem to be reprioritizing. Also, Taiwan has had a defense buildup for several years, and they’re far more capable of defending themselves than before.

If China makes any serious move against Taiwan, IMO, it will be a while from now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Idk. We’ve choked China out of AI supremacy. All of our mega GDP makers rely heavily on TSMC. Heavily.

I mean, entirely.

Like Biden throwing billions at chip manufacturers. Tensions in the South China Sea are ridiculous. The stakes have never been higher, and it’s right in what they see as their back yard. Taking down TSMC cripples the US economy, causes a worldwide kerfuffle (especially with tensions from Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Palestine, Israel/Iran, US/Israel, US/Ukraine, US/Iran relationships.

I get what you mean that you’ve been thinking that for a decade. Ive been seeing it for as long. But it’s gotten real with the AI bubble and tech sanctions. If it doesn’t burst before 2030, there’s no way China doesn’t act. Frankly, I’m betting on less than 6 months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

China starting it like that had been my firm suspicion for years, but after the past year or so, I’ve changed my mind. They still could be the ones to trigger it, but there are so many more players now. Russia could start it (or have already done so without us realizing it yet). Israel could start it. China could start it over island territories that they have no legitimate claim over–oh wait, that includes Taiwan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Strange time to change your mind about it…?

South China Seas have never been more piratey. It’s basically a warzone already, inching closer to Taiwan every day.

By this I mean like… What’re your regularish news sources? Because my radar flipped the other way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m still waiting for a star war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They will die horribly. This is a way for North Korea to purge people. It’s fucking disgusting.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

That, or depending on how mistreated they were in North Korea, the soldiers surrender immediately because I’d have to assume Ukrainian prisons/jails/whatever are nowhere near as bad as just living in North Korea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I believe this is a possibility, esp. considering how openly Ukraine will accept surrenders/defectors. Russia may be a shithole for a lot of people, but Ukraine doesn’t have a huge amount of benefit to offer most Russians (to surrender/defect) compared to North Koreans. Ya, know, aside from the freedom from chattel military slavery… but most in NK have it much worse than Russians, so the appeal would be greater.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Their military is not what North Korea wants to purge. That’s where they actually bother to send food.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.1K

    Posts

  • 124K

    Comments