132 points

Despite his efforts, Dolan’s message did not gain enough traction. His campaign, funded largely by personal loans, couldn’t match Ocasio-Cortez’s $8 million war chest.

You people are living in an oligarchy and “who has more money for this season” being a perfectly normal news bit outside of popular sports is completely insane.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

You realize that “you people” includes you, correct?

Or are the mega rich treated just like everyone else where you are?

If so, where is this magical land of fairness?

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I do not life in the US. However because of US hegemony and my country being a suck up to the US i have to follow what is going on there.

But in case there is any doubt. The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the “center” parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The “liberal” middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

So if you have the opportunity, please help spread awareness about all the shit happening here too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Politics shift to the right when people feel disparity, and their future looks break. Politics shift left when people feel optimistic about their future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the “center” parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The “liberal” middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

The funniest part is that this has been brought about by the common belief that idealism is stupid and dangerous and leads to fascism, while cynicism is very smart and realistic. One good thing about idealism is that it gives you a reason to fight and sense of good and evil.

What I mean is that idealism, say, 20 years ago would be associated with extremism, neo-Nazis, unreformed Bolsheviks, sect members, radical Islam. But somehow the actual fighting forces sporting all such ideologies work without it too.

As if that “sail” filled not with wind, but with popular emotion were worse than lack thereof, because without it your “boat” wouldn’t be moved from the right (presumably) track. Turns out the “boat” also has “oars”. Evil doesn’t have to be charismatic, although it was that in the 1930s. It can do just fine with apathy and half-consent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, that’s right. The last European elections at the latest showed impressively that those dull people who are unable to see through the PR campaigns of the powerful are not an exclusive US problem. It is of course absolutely right that we in Europe rely far too much on the Americans and should set stricter limits to their capitalism, which in my opinion is completely out of joint. But I fear that we have already gotten too far into this quagmire. This is precisely why it is all the more important to raise awareness of this and to name those who are actually responsible for falling living standards and growing inequality - the US-type opportunists, the hangers-on and especially the blatant fascists in the ranks of our politicians and our societies. I am not at all convinced that the reasonable people have a shot, but I sure will continue to make an effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Feels like the whole world is on the same trajectory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

At least I heard that world war is unpractical thanks to nato…

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/party-financing lots of countries limit how much can be given to politicians

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Eh… There are a variety of end-runs around this mechanism.

Hiring politicians on as lobbyists or allowing friends and family to sit on private run boards and trusts can create a back channel for money to flow into a politician’s pockets. Public money can be funneled into private profits for which the supporting politicians are also stockholders. And politicians can receive discounted/free services from friendly private sector constituencies. FOX News, the classic example, is a multi-billion dollar network dedicated to running Republican-friendly media. But when corporate lobbyists and political strategists can be found everywhere from the boards of NPR/PBS to the guest chairs of MSNBC to the editorial rooms of the WaPo/WSJ/NYT, there’s really no safe spaces left.

You can mitigate the direct “bag of cash for favors” effect that, say, John Boehner cutting tobacco lobbyist checks on the floor of the House has produced in the past. But you can’t keep public sector administrators from finding ways to receive kickbacks via private sector channels unless you completely divorce these institutions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The DNC are not moderates. They are economic far right with imperialist foreign and racist internal policy, but some LGBT rights sprinkled in between.

And i am quite sure if people like Sanders or Stein would win it will definitely not be because of corporations funding them, more the opposite actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, Stein was funded by Putin and his buddies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Jesus fuck you people claim it’s rigged no matter who wins

Headline: “Person with most money wins race handily”

Far Left Antifa CCP Tankie on Lemmy: “Damn, seems like the sheer volume of money is determining the winners of these races”

Reasonable Rational Centrist: “STFU, you stupid idiot! Why can’t you just be happy that the person with the most money won?!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Yeah, that’s how elections work. If it were in good faith, it’d be a valid complaint. But it’s not. It’s just another thing they pulled from a hat labeled “how can we make Democrats look bad here?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I like how that guy thinks the hive mind complains when progressives win because of “corporate donations”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah those corpos tipping the scales for progressives. Such a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

That’s because billionaires have purchased SCOTUS. The outcome of a single court case has allowed unlimited money from whomever into election campaigns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Moderate: Conservative Democrat/I Can’t Believe It’s Not A Republican

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Good. Anyone described as a “moderate” in the US is actually a conservative at best. Anyone described as a “conservative” is actually a fascist at best.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It seems many described as “left” in the USSA are conservatives too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hate this divisive bullshit. Democracies require pluralities. You need to be a big tent party to govern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The most divisive people in politics don’t want that big tent to be a governable coalition. If you appeal to big tent politics they start trying to incite violence including political subjugation of the same opponents that you’re trying to appeal to. You’ll see them around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Reality check: Repubs are trying to elect an insurrectionist promising to be a dictator. I’m sorry facts are divisive, I don’t like the situation either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Sorry. how does AOC defeating democratic moderate in a primary impact a republican getting elected. I don’t think moderate D’s or voting R on the presidential ballot. A moderate Democrat is still voting democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Suck it AIPAC.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

The ones laughing at Bowman’s loss? Yeah, I’m sure they’re crying so hard tonight

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

Will you people shut up about the DNC/Israel/“Them” rigging everything now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This guy doesn’t know the difference between rigging and ratfucking, point and laugh at him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d rather not give them even that level of attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why? We get to tell the truth and apparently deeply bother you all at once. Seems like a win-win for everyone but you , and you don’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I don’t expect you to actually stop, I just expect to expose you as disingenuous partisans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You could argue that AIPAC is partly responsible for the mess we’re in, as well as other PACs. So, I don’t think that they will stop. Hell, one could hold that stance while voting for questionable politicians on their side. You just gotta make sure that the threat of being primaried remain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

After what happened to Jamaal Bowman. Not a fucking chance.

Oh, did people pointing out the unfair latitude given to your favorite genocidal nation make you upset? Whoops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh shit we got a new troll in da house

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

fuck moderates, we’re fighting for our goddamn lives and the life of American democracy. We got no room for both-siders.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments