197 points

Of course they are pissed. He said he fucked up, acknowledging mistakes is the antithesis of being part of the GOP.

permalink
report
reply
84 points

This will be complicated when they start seeing Tim Walz in the mirror every day. He looks like a lot of Trumpers.

I remember when John Bolton was in the news it made my dad dye his mustache because he couldn’t stand looking like the guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Your dad has a silly moustache.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Boom roasted

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s a pretty silly guy. It’s one of the things I love most about him

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Waiting for the moment bald trumpers start growing their own hair to look less like Walz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

In the end this won’t matter because Fox viewers are not going to listen to anything that’s being said beyond superficial positive/negative framing. So since the anchor said he is bad they’ll think he’s bad.

Objectively though yes, the video is funny and Walz does come out looking good and not bad despite it being a “hit piece”.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

If that’s what Fox News is going to roll out as a hit piece, Tim Walz is unassailable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points
*

I think it’s very telling that through his tenure in office here in Minnesota, the local QGOP’s best attack against him is that he spends money (on good things) and his tax policy produced a surplus (because he fixed the deficit).

He is a vet, a devoted family man, and an avid fisherman and hunter.

He’s exactly what they fear most. A blue collar progressive.

So he’s not unassailable. You can attack his policies. But the problem is, they’re fairly popular and have made Minnesota safer and more prosperous than all our red and purple neighbors.

I will add that the local media in MN has cast Minneapolis/STPL downtowns as a horrifying, unsafe, ruinous hellscape following the riots that followed the murder of George Floyd. This has in the last year or so become less impactful as rural folk have started coming to the city again for sports games, etc. But that is another attack vector I’ve seen them get some mileage out of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Of course they’ll hate him no matter what for being a Democrat. But if the best they can do is a “hit piece” that could only cause him to gain support, not lose any, they shouldn’t be doing them at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

permalink
report
reply
87 points

A politician who can admit when he’s done something wrong? No wonder fox hates him.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Harris did well to choose him. This ticket has me hopeful for a November win. And the subsequent humiliation of the traitor and felon.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Yeah, I watched his speech at the PA rally tonight and it was excellent. The dude’s just a refreshing voice in national politics. I think he stands a great chance of delivering a lot of independents who are just looking for some common sense out of a politician.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Coach!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments