76 points
*

You know what’s great for getting Cuban votes in Miami? Supporting sanctions and starving out Cuba.

The gusano voting bloc is mutually exclusive with people who don’t like starving foreign countries.

There may be hope for Cubans who fled in the 90s due to famine, but the social relations and economic and cultural history of the ones who fled either fearing the wrath of the people they’d exploited or seeking to restore the privilege they had pre-revolution are always going to vote for the fascists.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

The gusano

You know there’s a way to make your point politically without using literal slurs right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

This one confuses me, what’s the basis for this being a slur? It’s based in ideology, not race (given that it was invented by cubans for use on other cubans) or sexuality.

That would make Tankie a slur too, wouldn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes but they’re okay with that one :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

what’s the basis for this being a slur?

It’s a slur just like “Uncle Tom” would be for conservative black Americans, it’s not exclusively racial, but it has a nationalist and racialist element, that’s added onto by ideology.

That would make Tankie a slur too, wouldn’t it?

If Tankie was used like Gusano is, to justify violence and to persecute, then I would be against using it too.

The term was also prevalent in hate crimes against anti-revolutionary Cubans. In September or October 1961, over the course of a week, 12 deceased bodies were discovered over Havana with notes attached to them that said "gusanos with pro-revolutionary [ideologies], CIA agents

During the 1962 wildfires that destroyed sugarcane plantations, locals in Cubas were reported saying that “gusanos have infiltrated the canefields.”[28] This led to quick military tribunals resulting in death by firing squad for “gusanos”

But no use of Tankie has ever neared how the Cuban government used Gusano to justify mass persecution of those unfriendly to the regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it blows my mind how much gusanos and evangelical chicanos & tejanos hold in common and i’m convinced that if they listened to the same music and spoke with the same accent; that they would be indistinguishable from each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points
*

Cubans tend to vote conservative. They vote that way because the Republicans have done their usual job of non-stop messaging on Democrat = Commie Socialist.

Many fled Cuba because of castro’s communism, and they understandably don’t want that again. There’s the religious factor, as many of them are catholic and of course the republicans call the Dems “godless” or whatever too.

There’s also this perverse psychology where people from authoritarian and repressed countries move out to democratic countries and then suddenly miss “the good old days” where reductionist messaging and “strong man” leaders just told them they were strong and flexed at every opportunity, but blamed everyone else when that strength wasn’t effective. Beat those protesters and jail them, send the military to the borders, arrest anyone who doesn’t conform. They want the authoritarian back. And the republicans offer that populist messaging of the strong man who is going to kick everyone’s ass, including the ones in your own country who don’t fit “the norm”. I’ve worked with emigrées (?sp) from both Cuba and Russia and it never ceases to both anger and baffle me that they ran away from shitty, awful dictators and then turn around and want the same thing here in the US.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I think what’s missing from your analysis is that they tend to be socially conservative. As in, they don’t like the gays and the atheists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This was also left out of the discussion with Palestinian voters in Michigan at the peak of the blowback for Biden’s support of Israel a few months ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Are you implying that Palestinians aren’t going to vote Biden because they’re too socially conservative?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Well, it’s not really relevant when children are getting killed.by potshots and indiscriminate bombing right?

Just because someone’s parents are hypothetically massively homophobic, doesn’t mean kids deserve to die.

(Im not suggesting you are saying that)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“Socially conservative” wraps up their position pretty tidily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I have no idea what you’re trying to say in context. Which part is communism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sorry dude, my bad, that image is a “miami thing” where anything from libraries to taxes used to level the playing field are received with that phrase from Cuban/Nicaraguan/Venezuelan diaspora even clean initiatives and all in between with the exception of Parking and tolls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve worked with emigrées (?sp) from both Cuba and Russia and it never ceases to both anger and baffle me that they ran away from shitty, awful dictators and then turn around and want the same thing here in the US.

smells to me like it’s probably related to the psychology behind prolonged abusive relationships, or people continually getting into abusive relationships.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There’s the religious factor, as many of them are catholic and of course the republicans call the Dems “godless”

As if the Republican evangelicals actually had anything to do with christianism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not about what they actually do, it’s about how they make you feel about what they say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It just surprises me that this messaging is so effective when Trump would love nothing more than to send every brown person living in Florida straight to Cuba, American citizen or otherwise. It’s a very strange sort of political climate where people who fear being deported back to Cuba are voting for the party promising mass deportations because… they don’t like abortion? I can’t quite wrap my head around it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

When the axe came into the woods, many of the trees said, "At least the handle is one of us.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

permalink
report
reply
21 points

You understand that Castro went after than more than just slave owners right? It’s super disingenuous to pretend that most of the 1.5 million people who have fled Cuba were slave owners.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

If they were fine with Batista being a military dictator, but drew the line at someone trying to upend his stint as one, I’m going to ask, why the military dictatorship didn’t cause them to flee every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You understand people fled Cuba not only because Castro was trying to take their plantation or Casino, but because the US has spent over have a century carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

Citation needed

BTW: You mean that time when Cuba was soviet ally and had on their territory soviet nukes aimed at US?

Fuck you and your revisionism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

They’re cultists. If you talk to them in neutral sub, You’ll find horribly defective logic and broken definitions (“Your definition of Anarchy is wRoNg, anarchy is an organised system!!!”).

If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I agree with most of what you’ve said, you should read more from anarchist philosophers like Tolstoy or Goldman though.

Socialists

However I would subtract the socialist from you comment and just keep it at communist, there’s plenty of democratic socialist parties that never devolved into rampant totalitarianism like the leninist parties did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

are we talking about hexbear? The sub that is insufferably boring?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Anticommunists are right-wingers, more news at 11.

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

That’s a nice part of accepting refugees from a state like Cuba. You pretty much get to selectively import the right-wing elements of their population.

Similar effect happens with Venezuelans. The ones who can afford to uproot their lives are also more likely to align ideologically with US politics.

I used to work with a lot of Cubans. My favorites were the old ones. They would tell me stories about living in Cuba under Castro back in the day. One thing that I always found interesting is how they said they were happier. It might just be nostalgia but I’ve heard from older people from Soviet areas too.

Life was slower and as long as you did your job certain things were guaranteed to you. In a capitalist system you have infinitely more purchasing power but they would make the analogy of addiction. In the US you are addicted to money so you need to work a lot more to pay the bills.

Whereas in Cuba you spend a lot more time idle and just living life, even if you’re not able to purchase common items we consider essential. (Some days you go to store and there’s no shoes, next day there’s no bread, etc)

My least favorite were the 2nd generation ones. Like Marco Rubio. They don’t understand the struggle but feel intensely like they do. Very strong opinions with very little nuance. I’ve met my fair share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Like the people escaping islamist hell holes only to be pro sharia in Europe. And people escaping violence stricken African countries and then end up in gang Fights against their countrymen in Europe.

These people are just as much part of the problem in their old home country as they are in their new home country. But where probably affluent enough to buy a (very dangerous) trip out of their previous hell and want to make their new home into a nightmare.

This is not all of them btw… this is a minority of the minority. The problem is, these people fuel the far right as if they are pooring liquid oxygen on the fire.

If trump ends up elected, I wish these people all the luck in the world. They will need it.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yeah, it seems many didn’t have an issue with the evil shit just that they weren’t on the top and/or were poor

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

These people aren’t trying to create communism in America, the older generation fled because communism was making society more equal, and they stood to lose, and are the most right-wing mfs you’ll ever meet.

This applies a little less to the ones who fled after Reagan offered US citizenship and were mostly criminals who chose America over prison.

And not at all to the ones who fled during the 90s, fleeing famine after the USSR collapsed and the US wanted to make an example out of Cuba.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Democrats are not creating communism in the U.S.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Correct, but Rubber Duck was implying the people fleeing Cuba were communists trying to recreate conditions of Cuba.

But no, they’re absolutely not trying to get everyone healthcare and housing and a constitutional amendment securing LGBT+ rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 163K

    Comments