Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/Kz2Sp

-10 points
Wired Magazine - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Wired Magazine:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-boeing-starliner-return-home-spacex/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
150 points

Lmao.

I’m sorry to laugh, but it’s just the absurdity of it all.

The downward spiral of Boeing is insane.

permalink
report
reply
51 points
*

I got hired 2 days before all this shit! Had a pretty alright gig as a regional analyst before accepting. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

At this point I’m expecting the big Boeing building down the street by NASA to collapse in on itself and the doors to be found 3 towns over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It would be quite something if the Everett assembly building collapsed like a circus tent.

Largest building by volume in the world.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Everett_Factory

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The irony of not being able to spiral downward, when spiraling downward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

This is how you know when to buy their stock

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

But don’t worry though, NASA says the astronauts are “not stranded”.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Totally not stranded! The capsule that will bring them back just goes to another school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You wouldn’t know that capsule. It’s . . . It’s Canadian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If only, those Canadian space modules are sexy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah, I am seriously upset. NASA press office seems to be telling lies left and right, and they think they’re just pulling the old Washington spin cycle, but it’s obvious lies. And they’re easy out of line.

They issued a 248k “emergency” engineering study contract to SpaceX to support extra pax on the dragon. NASA press office claimed this award had absolutely nothing to do with Crew Test, but this was immediately contradicted by anonymous internal sources.

Heads need to roll at NASA PAO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Totally not related. Just requested shortly after Starliner arrived at the station with issues. With an expeditious response. Totally normal procedures. Nothing to see here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re not. Whether they return on Starliner is the question. SpaceX can send a Dragon up to bring them back easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

As far as the Starliner mission is considered, they are stranded. Dragon is the rescue mission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I mean, Soyuz is the emergency rescue plan. Usually 2 of them sit docked to the ISS at all times for just this purpose. But regardless, the Starliner is functional enough they could leave right now if they had to. They just aren’t stranded, NASA isn’t just like… lying.

The Starliner has redundant systems and even with several thrusters offline it’s still within safe operating parameters. They’re keeping it docked because they want to figure out the problem, not because they need to figure out the problem.

There isn’t a dragon capsule ready to go at the moment, but it doesn’t really matter, it shouldn’t be needed. Because as I said, nobody is stranded, at least not yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Yes, these headlines are continuing to say the astronauts are stranded, which really isn’t the case. This vehicle is working well enough to return them at any time.

The thing is, there is something weird going on with some of the thrusters (of which there are many for redundancy) and this is their only chance to investigate the issue. If they were to return with the astronauts now, it would mean leaving the thrust module to burn up in the atmosphere, and then we wouldn’t be able to test the problematic parts. We could still do that (leave now), but we’d miss out on this opportunity to test hardware and understand better why some thrusters failed.

On the other hand, this is still a huge waste of money and it’s one more example of Boeing bungling things. So I’m not saying this is a great situation, just that the astronauts are not actually “stranded”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretty sure the ISS always has a Soyuz on hand to bring astronauts back, but if they use that, then all the astronauts have to go back because the “bail out” options will be gone. So troubleshooting and getting the boeing capsule working is the primary goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well yes, that would suck to have to abandon the ISS for any period. Definitely not optimal. But as I said, they could leave in the Starliner right now, if they wanted, they have more than enough thrusters functional to control the craft. It just makes more sense to stay until they’ve done all the troubleshooting and know how to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Perhaps if they released some clue what they are learning, and what weeks 9, 10, 11, and 12 will reveal about the problem. Around week 4 this was a PR disaster and the silence is speaking even if they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, the aerospace industry is not really known for moving quickly… But then Boeing collects a paycheck either way, so they don’t seem to be in any particular hurry.

But I don’t know, I’m not sure it’s a pr disaster, I mean it’s no worse than it usually is up there. We’ve had a Soyuz that sprang a leak and started venting atmosphere. We’ve had random helium leaks into crew compartments. We’ve run out of working eva suits. We’ve had resupply missions that never actually made it all the way to orbit, we’ve had a lot of non-critical internal equipment failures.

It’s a real challenge keeping everything working, this is just one example of how things can go wrong. (Though admittedly, not a lot has really ever gone right with Starliner.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Boeing doesn’t listen to their engineers, but we’re supposed to listen to their marketing department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m just glad they have a ready-to-deploy backup plan. SpaceX is nailing it. I just hope that the future will remember the terrific work that Gwynne Shotwell and many others did while “someone else” where busy tossing money away.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Sorry, no. Fuck SpaceX. They are helping destroy everything.

https://www.independent.co.uk/space/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-internet-b2567423.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Well, this was actually fkning concerning. Ofk is not like other Company aren’t playing to launch thousand of satellites too. There should be a serious regulation and some heavy changes in the metal alloy used at very least. I’m sure that Trump already has a plan about it…

… ofk i’m fking kidding. Vote [everyone else] x president .

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So we’re starting to look at aluminum debris in the upper atmosphere, when are we going to look at carbon fibre debris? Or rocket fuel in the upper atmosphere? We dont know what any of that shit does. Im going to hazard a guess that it does nothing good.

If you were to light ten thousand Starlink satellites on fire in a bonfire on the ground people would put you in jail. When it happens in the upper atmosphere its called progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Type of metal doesn’t matter, it’s any particle that leftover CFCs from the 1970s can stick to and make it more likely for them to react and destroy ozone. The ozone hole is over Antarctica and changes size seasonally because high altitude ice clouds do the same thing, smoke from forest fires also does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Ehhh needs more study. Aluminum oxides in the atmosphere actually provide a cooling effect. That being said, we don’t know much about the health implications yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right on. The “cooling effect” will hopefully offset all the kerosene and methane they’re injecting into the upper atmosphere and oceans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If you read the article the hazard is the Aluminum Oxide could deplete the Ozone layer. So a disruption to a different ecological process rather than the Greenhouse effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Aluminum is a major element of the 5200 tons of stardust per year. Sadly found no numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can criticise them for that while being glad they are a reliable astronaut transport, unlike Boeing. The world is not black and white.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am glad of that, but this is what I responded to:

SpaceX is nailing it. I just hope that the future will remember the terrific work that Gwynne Shotwell and many others did while “someone else” where busy tossing money away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Two “not stranded” astronauts becoming increasingly stranded. More at 6

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments