Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/Kz2Sp

150 points

Lmao.

I’m sorry to laugh, but it’s just the absurdity of it all.

The downward spiral of Boeing is insane.

permalink
report
reply
51 points
*

I got hired 2 days before all this shit! Had a pretty alright gig as a regional analyst before accepting. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

At this point I’m expecting the big Boeing building down the street by NASA to collapse in on itself and the doors to be found 3 towns over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It would be quite something if the Everett assembly building collapsed like a circus tent.

Largest building by volume in the world.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Everett_Factory

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The irony of not being able to spiral downward, when spiraling downward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

This is how you know when to buy their stock

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

Why is NASA, a publicly funded science organization, fixing the mistakes of a for profit corporation?

permalink
report
reply
108 points
*

Because for goddamn reason we socialize the losses and privatize the profits

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Those reasons being monopolies and greed and corruption and capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Read the article.

Boeing might opt to cancel Starliner and leave NASA with just a single provider of crew transportation. That would be painful for both NASA and Boeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the knuckle heads that protest end up in the streets for things they cant ever change instead actual concrete problems they could change with pressure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

But don’t worry though, NASA says the astronauts are “not stranded”.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Totally not stranded! The capsule that will bring them back just goes to another school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You wouldn’t know that capsule. It’s . . . It’s Canadian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If only, those Canadian space modules are sexy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah, I am seriously upset. NASA press office seems to be telling lies left and right, and they think they’re just pulling the old Washington spin cycle, but it’s obvious lies. And they’re easy out of line.

They issued a 248k “emergency” engineering study contract to SpaceX to support extra pax on the dragon. NASA press office claimed this award had absolutely nothing to do with Crew Test, but this was immediately contradicted by anonymous internal sources.

Heads need to roll at NASA PAO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Totally not related. Just requested shortly after Starliner arrived at the station with issues. With an expeditious response. Totally normal procedures. Nothing to see here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Yes, these headlines are continuing to say the astronauts are stranded, which really isn’t the case. This vehicle is working well enough to return them at any time.

The thing is, there is something weird going on with some of the thrusters (of which there are many for redundancy) and this is their only chance to investigate the issue. If they were to return with the astronauts now, it would mean leaving the thrust module to burn up in the atmosphere, and then we wouldn’t be able to test the problematic parts. We could still do that (leave now), but we’d miss out on this opportunity to test hardware and understand better why some thrusters failed.

On the other hand, this is still a huge waste of money and it’s one more example of Boeing bungling things. So I’m not saying this is a great situation, just that the astronauts are not actually “stranded”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Perhaps if they released some clue what they are learning, and what weeks 9, 10, 11, and 12 will reveal about the problem. Around week 4 this was a PR disaster and the silence is speaking even if they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, the aerospace industry is not really known for moving quickly… But then Boeing collects a paycheck either way, so they don’t seem to be in any particular hurry.

But I don’t know, I’m not sure it’s a pr disaster, I mean it’s no worse than it usually is up there. We’ve had a Soyuz that sprang a leak and started venting atmosphere. We’ve had random helium leaks into crew compartments. We’ve run out of working eva suits. We’ve had resupply missions that never actually made it all the way to orbit, we’ve had a lot of non-critical internal equipment failures.

It’s a real challenge keeping everything working, this is just one example of how things can go wrong. (Though admittedly, not a lot has really ever gone right with Starliner.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretty sure the ISS always has a Soyuz on hand to bring astronauts back, but if they use that, then all the astronauts have to go back because the “bail out” options will be gone. So troubleshooting and getting the boeing capsule working is the primary goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well yes, that would suck to have to abandon the ISS for any period. Definitely not optimal. But as I said, they could leave in the Starliner right now, if they wanted, they have more than enough thrusters functional to control the craft. It just makes more sense to stay until they’ve done all the troubleshooting and know how to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Boeing doesn’t listen to their engineers, but we’re supposed to listen to their marketing department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re not. Whether they return on Starliner is the question. SpaceX can send a Dragon up to bring them back easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

As far as the Starliner mission is considered, they are stranded. Dragon is the rescue mission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I mean, Soyuz is the emergency rescue plan. Usually 2 of them sit docked to the ISS at all times for just this purpose. But regardless, the Starliner is functional enough they could leave right now if they had to. They just aren’t stranded, NASA isn’t just like… lying.

The Starliner has redundant systems and even with several thrusters offline it’s still within safe operating parameters. They’re keeping it docked because they want to figure out the problem, not because they need to figure out the problem.

There isn’t a dragon capsule ready to go at the moment, but it doesn’t really matter, it shouldn’t be needed. Because as I said, nobody is stranded, at least not yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Two “not stranded” astronauts becoming increasingly stranded. More at 6

permalink
report
reply
56 points
*

Holy shit. I got banned from reddit for saying the Boeing starliner astronauts should fear for their lives cuz Boeing. It was a joke, did not want it to become true! Hopefully they come home safe!

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Wow that’s actually crazy that they banned you for that lmao they couldn’t make it any more obvious they got bought off by private companies, yikes. I’m glad Lemmy isn’t prone to that, inherently by design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I got banned by a bot that found my comment and some human approved it. I deleted everything after that. 15 years, almost all of those with direct financial support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They autodelete any posts or comments I have tried to make on the SteamDeck subreddit, even ones highly praising Valve, and yet reddit is still filled with spam bots. I don’t have to worry about that at all here. It’s incredible how much of a shithole reddit is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It was a joke, did not want it to become true!

Reddit is, in fact, a joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A total ban like mine?

I got banned for going to sniffies and bringing people from there to r/Seattlegay, which I started during the pandemic.

They banned me site wise on all my accounts and all my devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They banned me site wise for saying that riot police should quit their jobs following RvW. But all the right wing trolls spewing vitriol were perfectly acceptable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I made a bunch of comments critical of the site and then banned myself (deleted account) before they could ban me. “You can’t fire me, I quit!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was a 3 day ban, but my first in 15 years on the site, and with “Reddit Pro” membership or whatever they called it. Yeah no thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments