258 points

I’ve had it up to here with people saying JD Vance had sex with a couch. How many times do I have to say there’s no evidence JD Vance had sex with a couch before people stop saying JD Vance had sex with a couch? Liberals must be pretty desperate to make up that JD Vance had sex with a couch. The story that on March 17, 2011 JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after so thoroughly deflowering a KIVIK Sofa Chaise that it had to be removed as a biohazard due to the various fluids in and around it, causing the night manager to not only quit but need intensive therapy is beyond the pale. Who would believe this? There is sworn. court. testimony. that JD Vance has not made bare skin contact with a couch within the past 5 years. That’s a fact. Look it up. The idea that this is because JD Vance cannot contain his overwhelming sexual urges in the presence of soft furniture is reckless conjecture. Calling JD Vance a couchfucker is slander and you need to take it back.

The Left™ will do anything to avoid talking about the real issues in this campaign, like the fact that Kamala Harris laughs sometimes.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

It’s funny you say that. However it’s a Fox News person that’s asking for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re too stupid to know that proving something like fucking a couch didn’t happen is impossible. They think that lack of video evidence will prove it, but they’re just jagwagons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Harris also has the skull shape of a Marxist! And the fact that she’s a girl will make all the other manly nations call us Sissies!

permalink
report
parent
reply
221 points

JD Vance is too much of a coward to release the couch sex tape

#releasethecouchtape

permalink
report
reply
106 points

It’s on Hunter’s laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Two males? Are they buttery?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Why are they not releasing the couch sex tape? What are they hiding? Was there a loveseat involved?

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Because the couch was underage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Gaetz was inquiring last I heard

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It was a…convertible sofa.😱

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hide-a-bred

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Are you saying the couch… was transsectional?

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points
*

There’s a lot to unpack in that statement:

“We don’t buy the hoaxes and believe the hype anymore,” he continued.

Yeah, Fox sells them, not buys them. Get your facts straight.

“Our eyes are wide open.

Uh-oh. That sounds pretty woke to me.

And if you’re gonna accuse someone of having sex with a couch, you better have video.” He then brought on a guest to discuss whether Harris has a chance at winning the election in November without further explaining his request for the video.

Yes, because you want to see it…for totally normal reasons.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Weird people

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Sofa king weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

AGOPAW All GOP Are Weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does word weird equal cringe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It can mean cringe but it’s more similar to the word strange and can be good or bad depending on context. Someone who learns Elvish and wears clothes from the 1920s could be considered weird but interesting. Republicans are the kind of weird that makes you feel uncomfortable around them. “Why are they so concerned about what my children are wearing?” Kind of weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

“Absolutely revolting claim! And where’s the proof? The video? I need to see that horrible, disgusting video before I believe these claims! Show me-I mean us the video!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I mean… they can’t possibly miss the joke, can they? It fucking racks my brain, the density of these fuckwits sometimes. The whole reason this is still a thing is because they’re saying shit like, ‘If you accuse some of X, you’d better have proof.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Hey guys, it’s time to mature up and admit that Vance probably did not have sex with a couch.

He made love to it. Also, the couch was totally asking for it.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

You know the couch was into it… When the couch doesn’t want it, nature has ways of just shutting all that down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I heard the couch was dressed like a total loveseat, and wasn’t even wearing a cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Lets call it what it is, folks. It was rape. He raped that couch. Just because the couch had a suggestively placed throw, doesn’t make it OK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The couch was asking for it, wearing that slip cover!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If the couch didn’t want fucked why was it wearing those sexy cushions?!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Showing off it’s legs. Disgusting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Too bad it wasn’t a bed because then we could talk about how short the bed skirt was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It was totally consensual

-The couch

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

You know, until recently I thought that the golden days of Internet activism were over and we were mostly living in times where it was ridiculously easy to get things censored on the Internet.

Then something as stupid as this gets this amount of attention because of Internet users having way too much time and energy to spread it. WTF

permalink
report
reply
39 points
*

Oh fuck yeah spread it

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Spread it like JD Vance’s couch cushions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Are there no actually serious issues in the world that it is worth spreading information about? I think there are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Shit I forgot that we’re only allowed to talk about one thing at a time, and if someone makes a joke then all the other information dies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

More serious issues than a fascist trying to take over one of the world’s most powerful nations? Not really. If saying his VP candidate fucks couches is bothering them this much, please keep spreading that information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There is no problem with the lack of information though. It’s the opposite, the internet is oversaturated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Much better to talk openly encouraging the posting of revenge porn.

Humans are such relative morality miscreants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do we still not have a risky click hero-user here yet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I clicked it. Only softcore/censored examples until you use the generator yourself at the bottom of the page. You can read about the project first without getting bombarded by a user feed or something terrifying like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Diabolical

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think that only proves your thoughts. This thing blew up uncontrollably. Now try repeating this with some truly important point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments