8 points
Defector Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Defector is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/defector-bias/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

permalink
report
reply
102 points
*

LOL. At first, I was like “ugh, please don’t editorialize the post title” but then I clicked the link.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

biasbot rates it a HIGH credibility source too LOL

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

Just goes to show you can be spicy and credible at the same time.

Also, I don’t think the headlines are typically factored into credibility ratings (I could be wrong on that, though). Otherwise, no media outlet would have a shred of it. I guess that’s just being realistic to the click-bait world we live in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Well no you wouldn’t have shreds of credibility after they get SLAMMED like that.

They’d have more bits, or chunks I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

A lot of people are saying they’re banging each other

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Well they’re not denying it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m saying it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

They definitely had a threesome with a couch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

A couch they named Ivanka

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Not just a couch, probably some weird sectional with a chaise on one side and maybe a recliner on the other meant for a more “cinematic” experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They’re saying Vance was…

In it for the chaise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I heard he’s got a perfectly nice sectional at home but he likes to cruise Ikea for a bit of strange once in a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Are people still talking about JD Vance having sex with a couch? We need to put to bed the idea of JD Vance having sex with a couch. It’s not appropriate for people to think of Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance having sex with a couch. JD Vance has gone on record to deny that he has had bare skin contact with a couch within the last 5 years. It’s absurd that JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after making sweet, passionate love to a KIVIK Sofa Chaise.

Once again, there is no evidence of JD Vance having sex with a couch. You need to stop calling JD Vance a couchfucker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I promise I’ll never say that jd vance violated a couch in a fit of reckless lust ever again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Look, I don’t know if JD Vance had sex with a couch. I don’t even know if JD Vance had sex with couch cushions. But yes, I’ve heard that JD Vance did not WRITE that he had sex with a couch in his book. I don’t know if JD Vance wrote he had sex with a couch somewhere else, though.

John Oliver called Vance’s staff to ask and they hung up on Oliver, which was reported as ‘not a “no”’, so I had been thinking, ‘ya know? maybe that JD Vance guy really is a couchfucker, who knows?’ But here you’re saying he’s denied it? Or partially denied it? Well I don’t know what to think now, but I guess it is safer to presume JD Vance having sex with a couch is probably more legend than fact. Certainly, JD Vance having sex with a couch isn’t something you’d want to discuss in polite society or political debate because we’ve no proof and a possible denial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

☝️ This, but unironically.

Because the bigger issue is the dolphin fetish!

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t think of JD fucking couches. Put the thought of him banging a couch right out of your mind…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I imagine it’s more like a threesome with a soggy pile of fabric, foam, and wood that used to be a perfectly innocent little piece of loveseat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s ok if they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They could probably get the all time most views of forever, if they live stream it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

One’s not a child or pornstar and the other isn’t a couch. Probably not happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Enjoy

permalink
report
reply
17 points

“i’m thrilled to have vance as my VP” LOL

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments