The electric car manufacturer Tesla had to issue a massive recall this month to fix faulty hood latches that can open while its cars are driving. The problem affects more than 1.8 million cars, which means it’s slightly smaller than the recall in December that applied to more than 2 million Teslas.

The problem, according to the official National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Part 573 safety recall report, affects model year 2021–2024 Model 3s (built between September 21, 2020, and June 2, 2024), model year 2021–2024 Model Ss (built between January 26, 2021, and July 15, 2024), model year 2021–2024 Model Xs (built between August 18, 2021, and July 15, 2024), and model year 2020–2024 Model Ys (built between January 9, 2020, and July 15, 2024).

The problem first became apparent to Tesla in March of this year after complaints about unintended hood opening from Chinese customers. By April, it had identified the problem as deformation of the hood latch switch, “which could prevent the customer from being notified about an open hood state.”

Although the problem is with the hood latch, as with many Tesla safety recalls, the problem can be fixed with an over-the-air software patch. The new software is able to detect if the hood is open and, if so, will display a warning to the driver to alert them to stop their vehicle and secure the hood.

270 points
*

The new software is able to detect if the hood is open and, if so, will display a warning to the driver to alert them to stop their vehicle and secure the hood

This should not be legal. They should be forced to recall vehicles and replace the faulty part instead of kindly asking drivers to pull over when the part fails.

The shit this company gets away with is astounding.

permalink
report
reply
156 points

Driving on the highway

Hood pops open. Can’t see anything. Try to brake but crash.

⚠️ Warning! Your hood is open. Please pull over in a safe location and secure your hood.

Tesla: OTA update successful

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Yup. No reason to rewrite the playbook.

“Full self driving” detects an imminent collision of it’s own doing. Car beeps and shuts off “full self driving”

Human was “in control” at the time of the crash, not our fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Human was supposed to be in control the whole time. In a Tesla and in basically any car, very limited exceptions apply. If some asshole goes to sleep at the wheel that’s the asshole’s fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Just like the rumored cut all driver aids instant before crash to say it wasn’t due to any of the auto pilot features

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The only way the hood can pop open on the highway is if it was open before you departed, so the warning would alert the user just like the switch did before they can drive to a dangerous speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

It’s not the actual latch that’s faulty, but the warning the driver should get, if they haven’t closed the frunk properly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

does tesla just not bother to hire a qa team or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s pretty tough to say without looking at comparable recall rates for other companies. My Toyota Corolla had two recalls that I know about while I owned it, and Toyota is known for their reliability. Tesla is just always in the news because they’re always in the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Cheaper to just let a bunch of people get injured/killed

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To be fair, it’s not an issue with just Tesla, but basically all modern software. The end user has become the beta tester.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Microswitch lever fatigue is what this sounds like and it’s really not the kind of thing that a QA team could ever detect without years of testing. This is just how it’ll go as we add more bells and whistles to all our cars. More obscure new issues will be identified years down the line and added to institutional knowledge for future use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Recalls aren’t uncommon. You just don’t hear about most because it’s not trendy.

One of my vehicles is at risk of catching fire. The other is at risk of its axle falling off.

These are major brands, within the past 5 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The latch is fault, and so is the sensor. Sensor doesn’t go off when the latch starts to fail from deformation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

According to the description, it’s just the sensor, not the latch. The microswitch has a lever like many do and that lever can become bent if damaged which would prevent it from warning the user if they failed to latch the hood. Most older cars just had a secondary latch so if you failed to latch it completely, at least the secondary one would catch it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s the owner that’s faulty for buying one in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mean, this can happen with any car that has a hinged hood (so nearly all cars)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Is a frunk a front trunk, or is that a typo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Front trunk, yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

This right here is why there should be a distinction between software updates and physical recalls. Calling this a recall without actually taking the product in and fixing the product is really deceptive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, but that’s how it works according to the NHTSA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It should be a traditional recall though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

That’s not what they’re saying. It’s essentially a “door ajar” warning. The sensor is what’s failing, rather than the physical part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Isn’t a sensor… A physical part???

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not if it can be fixed with an update, that’s a software issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Oh so here’s a fun thing. All American corporations have this level of freedom. We’re just paying extra attention to Tesla because their CEO can’t keep himself out of politics and the news. Ever notice you only see the CEO of GM/Stellantis/Ford when it’s a crisis or a new CEO? That’s how it works in a functional business. They aren’t any less shady, they’re just better at brand and scandal management.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Each country has it’s own authorities. Hopefully they don’t get away everywhere…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ford did this. On multiple years of some vehicles the fuel injector can crack and leak fuel onto the engine and lead to a fire. Their fix is to put in a fucking drain tube to drain the fuel away if that happens rather than replace the faulty part. I’m wondering if there are any legal options to make them just replace the part rather than their half-ass non-fix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not even.

Ford’s fix required them to physically add parts.

This is more like if Ford just wrote a software update to detect the crack and leak, then pop up a warning that you need to pull over and “secure” the fuel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Using software to patch design flaws seems to be a recurring cost-cutting pattern these days. Look at the MCAS of the Boeing 737 Max. This is how civilizations go to shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would say more annoying is to getting those alerts more and more frequently. According to the article this is a software “fix” for the lock banding and stopping functioning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It literally states the program is due to a deformation of the switch, a physical issue.

I’m sure there are ways to safely engineer around it. I don’t trust any American manufacturer to do so. What guarantee do we have that it won’t continue deforming further after the fix? What happens to the patched sensor software if it does occur?

Do you unironically trust Musk enough to not open your vehicles hood at 80mph?

Really not sure why so many people on this post are having trouble understanding that concept. Maybe they want to justify their $80k paperweight lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

giving elon another $55b bonus should fix it

permalink
report
reply
17 points

We need more children from him, because apparently we don’t have enough!

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Considering it seems all his children hate him, more can’t hurt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah I was about to write that some of the children seemed to turn out sane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Thankfully you don’t need to be one of his kids to hate him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Do your thing, ma-gic man! Chanted the crowd as Elon in robes entered the golden restroom with his xPhone in the right and a ceremonial vial of coke in the left hand. It was followed by a series of thunder-like farts and sniffs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points
*

Although the problem is with the hood latch, as with many Tesla safety recalls, the problem can be fixed with an over-the-air software patch. The new software is able to detect if the hood is open and, if so, will display a warning to the driver to alert them to stop their vehicle and secure the hood.

Patching the software isn’t a “fix”. Changing out the hood latch so it doesn’t come open while driving is a fix.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

"Warning: wheels falling off imminent! Please pull over!’

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You have 3 seconds to comply. 3. 2. 1. Goodbye!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m guessing this is an issue because of the increased usage of the “frunk”.

Nearly every ICE can suffer the exact same issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Can? Maybe.

But it’s far less likely to because you’re not using it anywhere near as much. It’s not reasonably expected use. Opening a storage compartment/froot/frunk is expected.

A 24 pin port on your PC motherboard that’s rated for 100 insertions would be completely fine.

A USB-C cable wouldn’t be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The frunk issue is a good point, and that I hadn’t considered - thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Trying to solve a hardware problem with a software solution. Where have I seen that before?

Boeing lurking in the shadows

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Right? It’s deformation of the hood latch. So a physical change. How long until the warning is permanent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thought you had made an Intel reference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Yes, because Boeing is the only time software has attempted to solve a hardware issue…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I too enjoy taking comments out of context so I can criticize them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

How is that taking it out of context? Software is used to fix hardware defects all the time, everywhere. Just because Boeing did it poorly, doesn’t mean it’s inherently dangerous or a bad idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Is this a real recall or an OTA update?

I hate Tesla, but a lot of news outlets are like

TESLA RECALLS BAJILLION CARS And what they really mean is they released an OTA update to fix some extremely rare race condition.

The issue is still bad, but I feel like the news outlets are sensationalizing to the point of dishonesty sometimes.

To be clear I’m not sure I understand the actual underlying issue here, so idk how deserved the headline is, but whenever I see them, I’m immediately skeptical

permalink
report
reply
33 points

The problem is with a shitty latch: the hood appears closed, but it’s not.

The OTA Update doesn’t fix the shitty mechanical latch - it still doesn’t latch consistently. What it fixes is another poor design choice: evidently, the car has sensors that can tell if the hood was closed correctly or not, but this was never turned on/programmed? The OTA Updates this so now the car can warn you when the shitty latch fails.

Or who knows, maybe they initially turned off that sensor because it was going off all the time because of the latch…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Although the problem is with the hood latch, as with many Tesla safety recalls, the problem can be fixed with an over-the-air software patch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The problem is a sensor that detects if the latch is closed. How did an OTA fix this?
It hard to tell how big of a concern this was

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They probably only used the sensor while unlatched, now they use it while supposedly latched too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Did you not even read the summary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

“all those words I have to scroll past before commenting? No, why would I read any of that?”.
-op

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I did and it doesn’t really give complete answers.

The latch is fine, but the sensor to detect when the driver didn’t close the hood can break. I dont understand how an OTA can fix that, and idk how common the problem was, so I can’t tell how sensational the headline is

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The issue is a faulty latch that deforms and allows the hood to open, and their fix is to have a warning light when the hood opens.

They’re not fixing the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Reading it, the latch doesn’t deform, the latch sensor deforms. It doesn’t allow the closed hood to open, it fails to alert the driver that the hood wasn’t closed.

But if the sensor is broken, idk how an OTA can detect that the hood is open.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments