120 points

For years I bent over backward to give Thomas the benefit of the doubt. I even researched his jurisprudence especially where it concerned civil rights.

Turned out I was wasting my time. Motherfucker was just corrupt.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

For years I bent over backward to give Thomas the benefit of the doubt.

Why though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

We used to try to think that Supreme Court justices took their lifetime appointments and unique place in our democracy seriously. Turns out, they’re corrupt asshole politicians like all the rest. At least on the Republican side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I even researched his jurisprudence especially where it concerned civil rights.

Because they’re not class conscious and made it a race thing. While completely overlooking Anita Hill’s story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

I worked for a city government in sewer automation inspections and I wouldn’t take a coffee from contractors because I wanted it crystal clear who I worked for. We can be friendly but if you go off spec then that’s the end of the conversation.

How the fuck this was ever allowed is shocking.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

Conservatives have a very… interesting idea of what morality is, which is more than a bit ironic considering they see themselves as extremely moral and “good” people

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

When your mindset is that everything you do is good and everything everyone else does is bad, it’s pretty easy to be a good person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

This is it entirely, good people do good things, and they determine if they’re good people by how much they agree with them.

They have the whole thing backwards; normal people determine if someone is good by the morality of their behavior, and they can’t comprehend this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A while back, evolution was under attack, I think it still is … regardless … Kenneth Miller talks about the root of these in his take down of intelligent design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohd5uqzlwsU&t=509s

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

We had a guy from the Navy come to our shop to inspect our product. He wouldn’t even let me go grab him a burger from McDonald’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Was he from the Navy or from the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps? We have had a couple of FDA auditors from the USHSCC and they were former Naval officers working on a second retirement. They were nice enough when you prove you are open but they absolutely will not accept anything but water. Maybe coffee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

LOL, no, he stopped his inspection and went to McD’s with me and saved a receipt for his cheeseburger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I had a job fixing state owned equipment and I was hesitant to take a damn bottle of water offered on a hot day case someone thought it was a bribe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
*

We expect scandal and fraud from our elected officials. That’s why they do it so brazenly and in the open. They know the people have no power because the system is rigged; especially if you’re a Republican.

Edit: Why the downvotes? Tell me where I’m wrong. Our elected officials choose judges, so it’s the same pool of corruption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I don’t know if you know this but the supreme court isn’t elected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I am well aware. But who selects those judges? Who is supposed to check and balance those judges? OMG, it’s our elected officials! You’re not contributing and just making asinine comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What do you mean by “especially if you’re a Republican”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The system is rigged by and for Republicans. We’ve repeatedly seen them break the rules, ethics, and the law with no repercussions. They have destroyed, from the inside, the checks and balances that governed elected officials. Look at Trump for the shining star of open corruption with full court Republican deflection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

I hope they can get some reforms through, take some power away from the Republicans who own justices. I don’t have a lot of hope, but maybe this time there’s cause for some?

permalink
report
reply
42 points

There will be no reforms before the election, for sure. The Republicans control the House and will not allow any. They like it this way.

After the election? Well, if Harris wins and we can give the Democrats control of the House and keep the Senate, then maybe? But without 50 seats in the Senate, they won’t be able to get anything through unless they do away with the filibuster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s what has me iffy on them threatening civil war. On the one hand, I don’t want to see people die. On the other hand, if it happens and is swiftly put down, then it won’t matter what the states who participated on the losing side say - That’s flat out treason, so they would HAVE to capitulate to the terms of the winners with said terms at least including, “Every politician that was for it being removed, banned from politics, thrown in jail, and lots of reform done to prevent these fucks from ever being able to lock up the political process again”

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

i feel like “reform” isn’t strong enough of a word for what needs to be done with the supreme court. “fucking overhaul” sounds closer

permalink
report
reply
27 points

It needs “reform” as in it needs to be completely dismantled and re-formed with all new justices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

with term limits. i don’t know if i’ll ever forgive RBG, no matter how much respect i had

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If not term limits, a mandatory retirement age

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Funny, because to me the meaning of reform can be as serious as using the guillotine.
Reform is when minor adjustments and changes are not enough. Reform is a complete overhaul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

YES

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 110K

    Comments