80 points

The comparison is kinda unfair. The big truck has a wider bed, bigger tires and more power. It also seats more people. So it is able to get more load through more difficult terrain. However we can be quite sure it won’t be used in that way.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

I’ve never seen one with wear and tear and/or dirt that would indicate difficult terrain. Those only leave the city in advertisements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are you around forestry, oil drilling, or similar sites? Obv most are fleet stock simple (with decent tires), but the 4 door, white truck with a V8 is ubiquitous when you need 4 grouchy dudes to effectively live out of it for a whole day, plus all their equipment and food. It’s hilarious how much shit these trucks hold and get anywhere with a 2 track

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That truck isn’t this truck though. That truck is dirty, dinged and always in use. The part of this truck that gets used the most is the entertainment system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

that only happens when actual working people buy it used, maybe a decade down the line, to do actual work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There’s a few in the country around here. The ones with dirt on them are almost exclusively the Toyota Hilux, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

up to but not including 7th gen hilux is more in line with what I would consider a reasonable truck design. I’d give them a pass before 2004 or so. The bulbous round ones, if people actually use them off the streets then it probably won’t offend me to see them on the road but personally I’d just have a small car for day to day and only use the truck for what I bought it for, storage insurance when I don’t need it. I’m still too scared of having my bike stolen to commit to no car it turns out. Some places are just too sketchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The tonneau cover is usually there because A) they do mostly highway mikes and want the improved mileage resulting from reduced drag, and B) they rarely use the bed, as those covers are a PITA unless you only remove it once in a great while.

I live in Central America where its mostly little trucks owned by workers, and they often drive on mud roads and hard terrain. The only people with trucks like the black one in the picture are US expats with …particular political leanings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nearly every tonneau cover folds or rolls up. Outright removal is a pain, but using the bed isn’t.

The factory standard cover rolls up in about 30 seconds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A lot of people wash them shortly after going off road to avoid rust and corrosion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

unless the owner does a full handwash, clay, compound, and wax every time, there is no way the trucks I’m seeing in my region are washed off road vehicles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

My brother in law has a truck like the one on the right. That backseat area is huge. You could stop and have a picnic back there during a road trip.

I can’t imagine owing it. It looks dumb to me and it’s far too big for normal use. But he’s a cross country hauler, so it’s not a big truck to him.

And they have three kids, so I doubt he gives af about pp showmanship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah.

Sure, most people with a big truck don’t need one.

That said, the capabilities of the bigger truck far exceed that of the Suzuki.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have yet to see a big truck carrying more than a ton of things, and I’m near home depot often. These trucks are capable of 800lb which should be fine for most people. I’d love a vehicle where if I found something I liked I could pick it up while still being a viable economical daily driver.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do you live in an urban area?

I did say most people don’t need one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

How did society even function without these big ass trucks. They are so capable and essenti.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The majority of trucks i see are driven by a guy in a perfectly clean dress shirt, carries a fancy bag for papers and they work an office job. Their justification is often something along a couple potholes on their rural road just outside of town (so they dont have to pay as much property taxes to fit potholes). They moved a fridge once for their kid 5 years ago so that paid for the truck in their mind.

The majority of these things are ego boosts. Hence why they tailgate, rollcoal, have loud exhausts and can be covered in sexist/racist/religious stickers. Its all about look at me for most of these trucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Amazing.

I’m not defending any of these people.

My point is, the two vehicles pictured have dramatically different capabilities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

it won’t be used in that way.

However, there is (or was) an additional product for faking off-road activity: Spray-on mud for giving a justification to need such a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In a way I almost prefer that to the blatant posers I see driving around with huge lifts and offroad tires looking spotless in our muddy season out here. I was at the combo laundromat/carwash the other day watching one of them wash an already clean truck while I was thinking about the massive mud puddle I’d be driving through to get home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol that almost done like a chindogu ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chindōgu )

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The small truck will have very little towing capacity due to its low weight. While many owners of these size trucks don’t tow anything with them, they do serve a necessary purpose beyond bed size. Boats, horses, trailers full of gravel, etc require much heavier vehicles when towing for safety.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

You absolutely don’t need anything this big to tow most of that stuff, most farmers I know do fine with a ute half as tall. The only case I can think of where one of these gigantic US-sized SUVs could be necessary is with an equally gigantic caravan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes, a tiny 15 HP tractor from the 1950’s can tow a big trailer around a farm no problem. What it can’t do is tow it at much more than 2 mph. Owners of these trucks can tow a 20 foot boat down the freeway at 80 mph. Now whether or not they use them for loads like that (they rarely do) is another issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They aren’t talking about tractors. Ute is what Australians and New Zealanders call pickups.

So smaller pickups can do much of the same as the large.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My brother’s Ford Ranger got pancaked because he was pulling his new boat that was too big for the truck and couldn’t stop in time at a traffic light before ramming the car in front of him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s just irresponsible. Trailer brakes are absolutely necessary. The electric brakes on my previous boat trailer could stop the whole rig, if I hit the button on the controller.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

If you’re worried about making the cab bigger and comfier, you don’t need a truck.

There are no arguments to this and no one has a point against me here. If cab space is the concern, you need a minivan or SUV.

Blanket statement with impunity incoming. Combining these vehicles is a bad idea. For safety and efficiency. If you think this is a good idea in any possible way, you’re simply incorrect.

You’re just buying an SUV with a truck bed attached because your little balls say you want a “manly” vehicle.

You wouldn’t put a hitch on a moped. Don’t put a bed on a SUV.

Extending the length of a vehicle past the point where a hitch makes it longer than a parking space should be a “first offense your company is due down immediately” kind of offense first of all. The amount of these hitches blocking sidewalks and handicap accessibility spaces is absolutely bonkers.

Why don’t we have a president type of office that doesn’t mess with politics or international affairs, they just have nationwide power for common sense stuff like banning pickups simply being used as passenger vehicles, curbing attempts to overgrow parking spaces, and probably a bunch of other stuff too.

Also, I have a great idea for a whole new tax. :)

Let’s make an industry out of dining these people to the point where only businesses use trucks. Regular people can rent them easily enough to move between apartments or what have you, but these should never have been general use daily drivers.

Let’s just crush and compact the entire pickup truck industry to an incredibly tiny fraction of what it is now.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

This is stupid. Why should a blue collar worker with a family have to buy and drive two different vehicles just because of your personal preferences. Building two vehicles is no doubt worse for the planet than making one slightly less efficient vehicle. This is especially true if we are talking about EVs which are the future of trucks this size.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

TIL blue collar workers only exist in the US South.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I never said they did? I don’t live in the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Stating in your argument “there are no arguments to this” highlights up front how close-minded you are to discussion on the subject. It’s perfectly acceptable to discuss things you strongly believe in while still allowing yourself to be open-minded about opposing views. In fact, I would say it is required for honest discourse to occur.

In my personal experience, I have one of these vehicles with a comfortable and spacious cab. It allows me to have one vehicle for all the tasks that come with a sheep and pig farm, and also allows us to transport our large family comfortably to and fro. I would like my family to be comfortable while riding in our vehicle, which is equally able to perform various work functions related to farming and transport a family. Why would we purchase and maintain two separate vehicles for these purposes when a single option exists?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Corn, wheat, and other farmers have separate vehicles to accomplish the tasks necessary for their farms, e.g. a combine harvester, seeder, iriggator, etc. I know they also have large spacious trucks as well, but my point is that it is feasible to expect an agricultural business owner, or any buisness owner, to have different commercial equipment for different tasks related to their industry. Besides, whereas all the people who need pickups for their business have them, not all pickup owners need their vehicles for business. I see many, many large pickups parked in residential areas of the city and around the suburbs. The closest most of those people get to agribusiness is going to the grocery store. That’s the second point, if you don’t absolutely need a large truck for business, you shouldn’t use one for your everyday driver. Imagine if big rigs were affordable for most everyone and people used them for daily driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

While I agree that farmers can have specialized vehicles for different tasks, not all do. We farm sheep, pigs, chickens, and ducks and do not have specialized equipment. We don’t even have a tractor. I also don’t disagree that people who don’t have a use for trucks don’t need them, but I wouldn’t go to far as to say they shouldn’t have them. While objectively worse for the environment than a vehicle more suitable to their lifestyles, it’s a slippery slope (as we’ve seen) once we start legislating morality.

Bottom line: if we didn’t operate a farm business, we wouldn’t have a need for or the desire to have a large truck. More likely, any truck at all. We certainly wouldn’t have one to park in the driveway of the suburban house we would probably live in. It’s just impractical, but not everyone is gifted with innate pragmatism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You are definitely wrong, there is a market for it. It’s clearly not as big as it currently is, but there are absolutely people that families and work some sort of construction or farming job where a truck is necessary, and carrying more than 3 people comfortably is also necessary. And two vehicles is also not feasible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nope sorry, you actually don’t exist. OP says it’s impossible for someone to need a truck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So without the pickup truck, you’d still be able to do it with an alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d need a truck to tow it anyways.

Common misconception, but you do not, and a folding trailer hooked up to a car with a tow rating capable of pulling it takes up much less overall space when it’s folded up than the truck will most of the time. You’ll also probably get better gas mileage, which is a bonus, plus better pedestrian safety, less force going into a car crash which collectively makes everyone on the road safer, and makes it safer to crash into stationary objects, decreased roadwear, things of this nature. This sort of trailer setup is done all the time in europe, as another comment concurs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Okay…so you need a truck to haul beer cans. What’s wrong with the simple low-profile one for that job?

The criticism is on freak hybrid SUV-trucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That market is astronomically smaller than the amount of these large pickups with huge cabs being sold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes, that’s what I said. Doesn’t change the fact that the market does in fact exist, unlike the comment I replied to was claiming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What do you think construction workers in the rest of the world do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

In addition, suvs are also unnecessary and unneeded.

You want a cross country vehicle? Get a jeep or a Suzuki samurai or a Unimog. You want to flaunt your wealth and show everyone how big you are on the road? Buy a tram company and lobby your city to install it. If you can’t do that, you’re not wealthy enough and have no right to flex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I agree about SUVs actually, but that’s a different argument. That one is more opinionated, whereas I can’t even fathom this ones being arguable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When I had to buy a truck I didn’t really care that the A/C and radio didn’t work. I didn’t care that the interior was stained and uncomfortable. I didn’t care that the ride was rough and noisy. I didn’t even care that much that it got bad gas mileage, as I wouldn’t be driving it much.

I needed a truck for truck stuff. I’m not gonna buy a truck with a leather interior when I’m normally covered in dirt when I’m using it. I don’t need it to look big and manly because I just need it to haul garbage and tow livestock trailers. And I definitely don’t want to pay $70,000 for something I’m going to use it offroad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s a hatch back with a strapon.

For manly men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You wouldn’t put a hitch on a moped

My dude, I put a hitch on a scooter. My little trailer kicks ass. Well, it did before it was stolen, but that’s besides the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It might still, just not for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

While I absolutely despise the rise of dumbass suburban cowboys, making it to require a business to own one is kind of stupid. I mean growing up in farm land, you do often need a truck to do things like grab manure or lime, picking up feed, or the occasional carcass.

You could tax based on vehicle weight and vehicle type instead of a stupid, outdated gas tax and that could actually put a curb on this type of dumbass penis extender behavior. Maybe lesson it depending on where you’re registering it, farmland zoned and registered under gets less tax but I honestly think that unless you fix the stupid bro country, wanna be cowboy culture that leads to this suburban cowboy dumbfuckery, you’re honestly not going to make much of a dent even with taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Trailers are great! You can tow with minivans, cars, suvs and trucks. Trailers typically are easier to load, have more capacity and can be a lot longer than a truck bed.

Contractors get most of their building supplies delivered by flat bed trucks anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

While I would be in favor of making vehicle sizes regulated we already have that but thanks to the requirement of dealerships and the lobbying from the big 3 tmcars here in America have minimum sizes rather than maximum sizes so if anything I believe it to be more ideal to break regulations so cheap affordable cars can finally be legal to build, sell and import

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We had a quad cab Nissan Navarra (Frontier) working forestry. Four guys in the cab. Saws, petrol, oil, gear, tools, wire and fence posts in the bed. Fantastic vehicle, got everywhere. Could haul serious weight when needed. It was a tool that became a battered jalopy. We’d leave it in the yard every night. I’d take the train home, my mate cycled and the other two guys somehow squeezed into a Smart car as they shared a lift. We were all insured to drive it on public roads 24/7 but none of us saw the point. Great vehicle in its arena but a hindrance and inconvenience outside of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Easy: the one on the right is compensating for mini pp

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m gonna need two of those

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Your mom lets you have 2 mini pp’s to compensate for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

gee bill

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Double negative, mega pp

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

The pp size is inversely proportional to the truck size.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I prefer walking, and use a bicycle when it’s possible. So sadly doesn’t check out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bicycle size isn’t zero, you you pp size isn’t infinity. It does check out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

that’s why I ride a bike.

I could get away with a unicycle if it weren’t for my MASSIVE SCHLONG requiring support and it’s easier that way than getting two unis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m picturing the two unicycle method illustrated in the style of Dr Seuss

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I suppose you are using a lady bike then so there’s more space for the schlong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No I have a sheat for the schlong on the horizontal bar of the frame

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What is lady bike?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 635

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments