188 points
*

Is it true that you can talk to women? I’ve never tried it before and I’m 32. I use Arch GNU+Linux btw. Also I’ve never been outside.

permalink
report
reply
70 points

Yes, but I don’t recommend it

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

I disagree. I do recommend using Arch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They call that Lordosis and I’ve only ever seen it happen when I showed one of the females my dual sli GTX 1080ti setup while benchmarking in Heaven. Getting her off my desk with her ass in the air is a pain but she apparently likes my hand going down her back and her ass patted. Getting her off my keyboard when I’m in the middle of a game can be a real pain sometimes…

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

Talking to women is no longer considered a best practice.
Recommend upgrading to listening to women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

It’s possible, but the feature isn’t supported on your OS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You can probably compile her yourself if you can’t find her in the AUR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Absolutely! In fact if you’re on Arch you may have a built in conversation starter by discussing your collection of thigh-highs and seeing where that takes you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah, it is real easy as well

Just walk up to them and press “X”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I use Arch GNU+Linux btw.

So does FitGirl, tho. And I guarantee she gets laid like crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Certified pirate comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
125 points
*

If I’m remembering right, wasn’t this specifically developed to assist in helping to better identify victims of human trafficking?

Yep. Found it.

https://www.romper.com/p/a-man-made-app-that-shows-women-without-makeup-on-there-is-so-much-to-unpack-here-5480392

permalink
report
reply
66 points
*

Boy that would seriously mess with the narrative of this comment section if that were the case

Edit: oh no

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It’s been used by people for nefarious purposes, regardless of its original intent. Both perspectives are valid.

edit: sexist horseshit is not a valid perspective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What sexist horseshit are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Of course the creator is going to tout the most morally upstanding use of his app. If it genuinely helps human trafficking victims, then that’s another story, but from this quote it just seems like he has some vague hope about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

A tech startup with vague likely unrealistic hopes? What are the chances?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah that sounds so much like post-hoc justification that I’m seriously surprised that it’s being swallowed by anyone.

I mean, great if it DOES help with such a terrible problem, it’s just I have seen this thing being talked about before and it’s NEVER been discussed in terms of helping trafficking victims. This is the first I’ve heard of it. Almost every time you see this kind of narrative being discussed it’s either 99% of the time a bunch of sweaty incels online whinging about how women aren’t really pretty and just want to trap guys or some other dom/sub kink fantasy nonsense to validate their depression and self-loathing, OR about 1% of the time it’s an actual empowering discussion talking about unfair hollywood beauty standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

wasn’t this specifically developed to assist in helping to better identify victims of human trafficking?

The author of the article you linked doesn’t seem to believe that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The creator stated their intent, and the author disagreed. Does that opinion make the creator’s statement untrue?

It’s a weird situation & definitely a slippery slope. Was it his intent? I honestly can’t say. I guess it’s certainly a possibility.

I don’t think this kind of app is harmful in itself. This kind of thing can & will obviously be used/weapon used by stupid shit-heads for their own agenda, but those kind of people will utilize literally anything that exists to justify their shit-head views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Notably unbiased person Internet McJournalist

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

It’s wild that hundreds of years ago, high society women would wake up to put on makeup. They’d literally never be seen without it. Waking up at crack ass morning, wear makeup, then make breakfast.

My wife and I went for a walk and she didn’t even wear a bra.

Life is great.

permalink
report
reply
60 points
*

There are plenty of women who live like this now. It’s a cultural thing, not a timeline thing. I had a roommate in college who would wake up before dawn to do her makeup so nobody would see her without it.

(Also high society women certainly didn’t make their own breakfasts… well, ever, but especially not hundreds of years ago)

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And depending on the era, certainly in England, many high society people didn’t get out of bed until 11am or midday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I love when your wife doesn’t wear a bra. It does make life great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We all love this guy’s wife

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

hun, step outside, I need to see if I need to bring a jacket…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Why have so many people down voted this? Do they not get it, or do they just hate nipples?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Having probably not seen a naked woman, I guess they don’t get it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i like the idea that high society women would make breakfast, maybe they’d play at it but the actual breakfast would be made by lower class servants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not sure why this comment is so popular. If you travel, you see many countries on the planet where all women wear makeup all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

This doesn’t look like a woman without makeup, it looks like a woman with makeup with a filter over her face.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Yep, looks like it was fooled by the fake contour on her right cheek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

I know jack shit about photo editing, but did this person just de-saturate the colors? The eyes and hair look like they are less vivid. Even the background looks different., less dark and more blue?

permalink
report
reply
47 points

The real challenge is to use the app on somebody not wearing makeup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Do it twice and every woman looks like Gollum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s how you know it’s accurate. Same thing happens if you use makeup remover twice on bare skin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

The ideal form

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Looks like it’s doing more than that since it seems to remove the mascara and added fullness of the lips from the lipstick

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy Shitpost

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 7K

    Posts

  • 95K

    Comments