Donald Trump spent his first 100 days back in the Oval Office driving an economy that the world envied to the brink of crisis, risking America’s reputation as a financial safe haven and fostering fear among voters who’ve lost confidence in his leadership.

Americans were desperate for relief from high grocery prices and bought into Trump’s promise to make America affordable again in November 2024, partly out of nostalgia for the pre-pandemic economy of his first term.

But the president deliberately and singlehandedly adopted policies that are almost certain to spike prices even more; that could lead to shortages; and that have CEOs and small businesses dealing with chaos and the possibility of a recession.

5 points

The brink? We’re already there, but the supply chain takes a few weeks to catch up. We are just now getting empty ports just like during covid. Empty ports now means empty shelves in a couple weeks. Empty shelves means prices skyrocket again. And layoffs start en mass when companies can’t get supplies that need workers to work on.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

You know, right before lockdown I was hanging out with a friend and I said something to the effect of ‘eh, I do feel like people are overreacting a bit but at least this should normalize mask wearing when you’re sick like in parts of Asia.’

Right now I have a very similar feeling hunch of ‘at least this should kill the myth that republican presidents are better for the economy’ and I can’t wait for the american people to once again show me just how stupid they are.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I think every single Republican president has been terrible for the economy and consistently show to know nothing about the economy in contrast to the Dems who inherit the mess. Trump is going a number on the national debt alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
253 points

Sure, but have you considered that Kamala had a weird laugh

permalink
report
reply
2 points

She also has no penis and is awefully dark for a good old white American

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Musk will light your taxes on fire. Obama was huge on deportation. Kamala is a gun owner. OK, why won’t you vote for Kamala then? “I just don’t like her. She laughs weird.” I couldn’t believe it, but it shouldn’t shock me. How do you even keep going after that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

It wasn’t really about the laugh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Yea, some of them also noticed she is a minority and a woman. Sadly our country has not accepted those groups are just as capable as white men to lead a country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She laughs like a black woman!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Republicans often try to liken women to witches in their constituents minds. It’s their go to smear. They hate women. They want them back in the kitchen under control of men, just like the propaganda that transformed post war America pushed

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I remember reading that immigration groups called Obama the deporter in chief. Trump wishes he could get a nickname that would go that hard with his base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

This is such a stupid argument and I wouldn’t believe it if it wasn’t for my dad. He keeps talking about her laugh and I explain to him that it’s appropriate to express all emotions…. And he doesn’t believe it. He’s also unable to connect me being in therapy and his behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I remember a stand up comedian making fun of someone laughing on his show, because it was a very shrill and loud laugh. And later he said: imagine making fun of someone for the way they express joy (or something) and that somehow sat really deep with me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I guess we have the same father even though I don’t live anywhere near the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The statistics of who stayed home VS who voted for a white man with the same policies (older white men/women and older hispanic men) shows most of the votes lost are from Kamala being a colored woman and our most bigoted groups responding accordingly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

100%. A woman of color? No way.

This is why AOC can’t run for president. We would just be stuck with Trump 3.0 or some Republican poser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Also, those dumbass’s who think a woman can’t be president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Unfortunately that includes a lot of women, making it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

My mom will still tell you that things would be much worse if Harris had won. Can’t say how, but she doesn’t hear the sarcasm when I suggest we’d all be learning Mandarin online while recovering from forced gender reassignment surgery and seems to consider that a legitimate possibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Most of those women were raised brainwashed by their church and family to be subservient to their man. In retrospect, giving those women in particular the right to vote might’ve been a mistake. It essentially just doubled the weight of their spouses vote.

That’s the drawback of universal suffrage, not just women’s suffrage…most people are idiots and easily manipulated. Women just moreso because of countless generations of oppressive patriarchy.

But there’s no real good way to test a voter without opening the floodgates for fraud and discrimination…so here we are. Idiots in charge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Americans will delude themselves into thinking Harris lost because of identity politics all the way to the concentration camps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They have to, or else they will be forced to change the democratic party and everyone knows deep down that democrats will never ever ever change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

What actual percentage of the American people do you think believes a woman can’t be president? And I mean believe her nature as a woman makes her unfit, not people who believe the electorate won’t vote for her.

Do you know any polls in the last year that indicate how big a contingent that would be?

I’d be shocked if it was over 0.5%. Even over 0.2% would be very surprising to me. Of course to get polls that precise you’d need to ask like 100,000 people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Unfortunately, it’s not black or white. I recall a woman saying she wouldn’t vote for Kamala because she thought America wasn’t ready for a woman president.

Is that her nature as a woman or people that believe the electorate won’t vote for her?

It almost sounds like passing the buck, I won’t vote for her because of everyone else’s opinion 🤷 idk, I don’t have the answers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Schodinger’s cat applies here. We will never know how good or bad Kamala would have been since she didn’t win. However, since 47 has done so much shit to damage the country in ways worse than imagined, I’d say she’d done better.

BTW, have you ever heard Trump laughing at anything? That’s even weirder IMO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

She would have been better. Biden was an OK president that was ruined by his brazen pro-genocide stance. It doesn’t take a lot to be better than Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In america a pro genocide president is still an okay president. Most school children drone stiked AND getting the nobel peace prize. Best president we ever had i tell you what.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I told my friends back in mid-October of 2023 that I thought the Hamas attack was probably 1.) heavily influenced by Russia, and 2.) going to throw the election to Trump or whoever the Republican candidate was going to be unless he could get that thing zipped up and a peace deal in place within a month or two.

So stupid. Biden could have done better so easily. But here we are, I guess, witnessing the oligarchy take over the world, using Trump and Musk as patsy’s, letting hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and Ukrainians die by the hand of genocidal fuckwits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s a competition to destroy the US and your opponent is Donald Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s about the only competitive scenario you could put me in vs. Trump and I’d despair that there would be no path to victory for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

She also was hugely supportive of genocide, is a cop, huge opponent of sex workers, promised to outflank trump to the right on immigration and crime, had a terrible climate change plan including backtracking on things like fracking, terrible health care policy, denied any economic problems and her solution to massive poverty and increasing inequality boiled down to increased ease of first home buyers. She had terrible policies no reason to whitewash her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

“Please be distracted by our appointed candidate’s skin color and genitals so you don’t notice these other things!” - democrats probably

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean Biden was personally killing Palestinians so let’s all make sure Trump does worse too so checkmate lIbRuL. Ps I’m morally superior because I think my self righteous social media posts matter way more than the outcome I cause with my actions. And if you disagree? Well, you love genocide! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well you see the genocide was always going to happen. That is why we needed to oppose the Democrats.

Also did you know NATO were actually the real Nazis all along?

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wow 🍿I do feel for everyone who didn’t vote for this turd. As I am not aware much about what is happening in your country in detail (though some us citizens sometimes think this way) can anyone give any insight on how this is perceived by turd voters? Like are there any interesting interviews insight or articles ? Would love to know their view as this unfolds. Thanks for any insight 🙏

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Risking America’s reputation? Maybe we’re slightly beyond that point.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Here in Denmark - one of the US’s closest allies for decades with a generally positive public opinion - America’s reputation has absolutely tanked. Being at all supportive of USA basically reveals you as a stupid far-right nut. We just need our politicians to see this as well because the US reputation is fully dead here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly the same take in Canada right now. With the added annexation threats, most Canadians that aren’t far right nuts will boycott the american brand for the rest of their lives, tarrifs be damned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think a feeling of distrust and betrayal will definitely remain for decades no matter what happens in USA. Many boycotters etc will definitely continue doing that for at least some products and on a state level we’ll never again be able to trust them with our data. That much is clear. At least I switched out all my tech and never going back

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 322K

    Comments