99 points

“You know, in recent weeks it’s become clear to me that I need to unite my party in this critical endeavor. I believe my record as president, my leadership in the world, my vision for America’s future all merited a second term,” Biden said. “But nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy. That includes personal ambition. So, I’ve decided the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation. It’s the best way to unite our nation.”

permalink
report
reply
29 points

It’s mind boggling the “new generation” to pass the torch to is nearly 60.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

i would vote for a geriatric chimpanzee in a coma over trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s sad that is clearly the right decision though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

i would vote for a magic 8 ball over trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Hot take: 60 is a perfect age. It’s when most people (especially lawyers) have a ton of experience, but are mentally just as sharp as 30 year olds. In ancient human societies she’d be “an elder” in charge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-134 points
*

Fuck off Joe, you’re slightly better than Hillary because you did eventually listen to reason.

But he should have said years ago he wasn’t going to run in 2024.

Hell, even if he just said it 6 months ago we could have had a real primary

It’s good he finally did the right thing, but he came damn close to not. He’s not a hero because he stopped doing the wrong thing at the last possible second. A week ago he wouldn’t stop rambling about “Lord God” was the only one that could make him drop

Dude is off the deep already, and has been for a while.

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

nah. i won’t call him a “hero” but this is the best way it could have happened, rather than republicans having YEARS to foment hatred and spin conspiracy theories and make everyone waste time debunking lie after lie about harris.

and nobody’s going to switch from D to R because it’s harris instead of biden. you can be fairly certain, however, that there WILL be people voting who weren’t going to vote at all when it was biden instead of harris

should he be applauded? yes. is he a hero? no. should he have announced it years ago? no fucking way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-54 points

but this is the best way it could have happened

The best way was this happening a year ago so we could have a primary…

But you don’t think Dem voters should have had a say?

I’m a lot more democratic than you apparently…

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

LOL good job parroting fox news’s desperate “bIdEn ChEaTeD tHe DeMs!!!” talking points. i’ll bet you’re doing it for free too.

news flash-- biden isn’t running, and you could have voted for anyone you wanted in the primary. so this entire “debate” about biden’s shoulda/woulda/coulda, while entertaining to obliterate people in, is getting the tankie position exactly nowhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Looks like we’re back in full “you can’t criticize the Democrats at all or you’re a Russian troll” territory. I hate this sycophancy.

I’m with you on this one. The Democrats have been skirting democracy to the best of their ability for years. I’m glad we’ve got a better chance of defeating Trump now, but I’m unwilling to concede the democratic process of nominating candidates. If we celebrate this fucked up process instead of holding their feet to the fire, they’re just going to learn that actually they don’t need to bother involving the people at all. We cannot give a single inch to the plutocrats at the top.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s a really awful take. It’s good that Biden has stepped aside but our lack of a primary absolutely isn’t “a good thing”. Primaries are how we battle test our candidates and Harris has never performed well in one. I hope to hell she wins but I’d have more confidence if she’d been able to secure the nomination through traditional means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

who do you think would have won (or should have won) this hypothetical primary that was “stolen” from us?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, she didn’t do well in her presidential primary, no argument there. But she did do well enough in her primaries for AG and Senator for California to win not only those nominations but those elections, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Now that he’s stepped down, it’s a lot harder for you to hide that Trump love. You’ve lost your talking point, lol. Floundering just like the GOP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He didn’t think he’d be pressured out 6 months ago. He’s obeying popular opinion that shifted after the debate.

Someone here compared it to convincing an elderly parent to stop driving. They’re not heroes either, it just sucks for everyone that nature works this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

He did like a tenth of the press conferences as the last two presidents…

And people were pointing out his age related issues 4 years ago.

The only reason it took till the first debate for a critical mass to demand he drop out, was that was the first people had seen him speak for longer than 5 minutes. Ive been calling for him to do more public appearances/interviews this whole term, lots of us did. But we were called conspiracy nuts for saying an 80 year old was as capable as the average 80 year old.

The people around him day to day knew how bad it was and knew he’d be forced to step down if the public knew. So they fucking hid him. Just like Republicans did with Reagan.

Like it or not, that’s what happened.

I hope you at least learned that it’s not just ok to criticize your “team” it’s fundamentally necessary.

If people hadn’t, wed still be running Joe and trump would still be likely to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
140 points
*

History will paint Biden very kindly. This speech will be the example of a humble, good man.

permalink
report
reply
-142 points

This is like calling a school bus driver a hero because at the last possible second he hit the brakes instead of intentionally driving the bus off a cliff.

It’s good he stepped aside, but he waited till pretty much the last second and clearly didn’t want to hit the brakes.

In that analogy, the heroes are all the people that got him to hit the brakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

That’s an interesting analogy because objectively the bus driver is a hero for stopping a bus full of kids hurtling off a cliff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

If he wasn’t the one flooring it headed right to the cliff…

And if he didn’t take months of people telling him to hit the brakes while he screamed back only “Lord God” can stop the bus

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s a poor analogy because there’s no one on the bus trying to grab the wheel and hit the gas by force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Maybe the timing was to ensure an albatross like JD was firmly tied around his neck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

So you think Biden and the DNC colluded and he always meant to stand down?

He just waited until there wasn’t enough time for a primary so Kamala could get it?

Don’t get me wrong, she’s got a better shot than Joe. But if you legitimately think they planned this timing…

That’s not a good look.

Especially for voters in NH who had their primary delegates stolen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

I didn’t call him a hero, though, I called him humble and good. In your zeal to urinate on corn flakes, you forgot basic reading skills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points
*

If he’s “humble and good” he’d have stepped down a year ago so voters could have a real primary and not a coronation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Good for being complicit in the Genocide of Palestinians?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He could have shrugged it off like RBG did and fuck everyone for generations. Better late than never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Better late than never.

Obviously.

But if a guy has a gun next to your head and ends up not pulling the trigger, are you gonna talk about how good your kidnapper was?

You still got kidnapped, and you still had a gun to your head.

Why thank the person who caused the problem and not the hostage negotiaters who got you released?

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Absolutely nothing was stopping him from remaining in the race until the convention and becoming the official nominee. That was a viable path forward, if he had wanted to choose it. That he did not, deserves acknowledgement and respect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree in principle with what you’re saying.

However, a sitting president is not entitled to the nomination. It’s happened before where a sitting president is denied a nomination for a second term, and it’s been given to someone else in the party instead.

If it had gone that way with Biden though, I think the optics would have been so bad that there would be no hopes of salvaging the election though, so it’s still praiseworthy that he dropped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

Must be difficult now Genocide Joe is stepping down to decide who to root for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-98 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
59 points

No. We are considering multiple challenges at the same time.

His decision here does help unite the democrats and brings hope to the younger generations. But, this decision also does not absolve him of his war crimes. Both can be true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

He is?? Well, I’m not voting for him or his son, then!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I guess I’ll just have to vote for Harris instead then 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Maybe vote for the felon because the genocide did not happen on his watch, so he is free of all blame.

/S

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And your not? Yout stopped paying your taxes right because it is genocide. I mean your not just supporting it out of a little inconvenience that might happen in your life right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

bidens realtion to the actions to israel is equivalent to the voter/taxpayers relation to biden. both are bound in relationships that limit the actions they can take. Im fine with hey he could limit more of what we do in relation to what he has to do via congress but the whole supporting genocide thing then its like well then so are you and all the west by and large. you can’t make one indirect thing as being the thing and not ignore the other indirects along the line and say oh well thats to indirect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do you actually care about the genocide in any actionable way besides yelling at people online?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

He is stepping aside and letting his VP, who has very notably not supported Israel, take the lead. Can you shut your piehole for a second? You got what you wanted, “Genocide Joe” is no more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

if your goal is a world where no one ever says anything good about biden, ever, then you’re in for a disappointing life.

also, if you think the united states will ever stop sending money and weapons to israel due to many many economic, geopolitical and military strategic factors–same thing, get ready for sadpepe.gif for the rest of your days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

She’s light years better than Biden.

But she still takes AIPAC money, and spoke at their conference 7 years ago after they helped get her senate seat

https://www.vox.com/2024-elections/362782/kamala-harris-gaza-israel-palestine-biden-netanyahu

But we literally just saw public criticism work, why are you so quick to say we have to stop?

We can’t just show up once every four years and vote. We need constant pressure on politicians for them to do the right thing

Because there’s constant pressure on them to do the wrong thing, and that almost always comes with “donations”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Stop.

She hasn’t been afforded the chance in the current context to actually express her true stance. I expect it to be much more tepid towards Israel than Biden’s, but at the same time, we are trying to prevent a fascist takeover here, and it is a very fucking bad idea to piss off AIPAC in that context, as infuriating as that is to admit. She’s got to walk a tightrope to win back Arab-Americans that Biden foolishly pushed away, but at the same time can’t afford to have AIPAC putting all hands on deck to try to kill her campaign.

TL;DR: foreign influence organizations both covert and overt - including, but not limited to, AIPAC - need to be cracked down on aggressively, but I really don’t see that happening until after the election at the very least. And even then, the odds are low, because they’ll all just bribe tons of politicians and offer quid pro quos lobby against any such laws. Its a huge problem and it’s proven to be infuriatingly intractable for AGES.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Oh God. You’re right. I better vote for someone who’s going to make the genocide stop by nuking them. After all, if we just completely eradicate them, then there’s no more genocide.

Right? That’s the answer you’re looking for?

Right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No one fucking forgot we just dont want the guy who says he’s going to accelerate the genocide to get in and with someone fresh it will be easier to pressure them to end our material support for the attrocities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

“Defending Democracy”

lmao

permalink
report
reply
15 points

What’s funny?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Are you one of those “The US is a Constitutional Republic” people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Huh. Just the other day, Trump claimed in a speech that he took a bullet for democracy. I wonder which democracy he was talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

No one voted for Harris. She was just… selected. Without a single vote. Democrats… spouting Democracy. fkin lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She also hasn’t been elected to anything yet? There’s nothing undemocratic about a party choosing who it wants to run in an election internally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I should vote for the fascist then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Her name was on the ballot in 2020, everyone who voted for Biden also voted for Harris.

You appear to be conservative, so here is the best online course I could find to teach you about the U.S. Constitution:

America’s Written Constitution by Yale University on Coursera:

  • Covers themes like popular sovereignty, separation of powers, federalism, and rights.
  • Taught by Professor Akhil Reed Amar.
  • Includes videos, readings, and quizzes.

Let me know when you’ve completed it and we can have a real big boy conversation ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments