A new poll shows that about 4 in 10 Americans say Trump has been a “terrible” leader in his second term.

The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research also found that about 2 in 10 think he has done an average job in his presidency and 3 in 10 says he’s been a great or good president.

44% say Trump’s focused on the wrong priorities in the AP-NORC poll, 21% said an even mix and 10% don’t know

12 points

How is it only 4 in 10?
Oh wait, maybe the other options were Horrible and stinking, which both received 3 votes.

permalink
report
reply
169 points

6 out of ten said what? This is fine…?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Could be 6 out of 10 said he should be put into the ground, it could also be 6 or if 10 said he should be the next pope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

2 in 10: Average 3 in 10: Great

If you all could just try to not take the rest of the planet with you, that’ll be great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You really got to wonder what that 2 in 10 thinks about the history of presidents of this country. I mean there’s been some stinkers but Jesus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Fucking politicians. All the same ain’t they.

Edit: …is what they are thinking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points
*

You really got to wonder what that 2 in 10 thinks about the history of presidents of this country.

It’s honestly weird to see people hyperventilating over Trump when I’ve lived through the Bush post-9/11 War on Terror and the Reagan Era War on Crime.

Both had wildly unconstitutional surveillance and arrests, extra-judicial black sites and torture prisons, partisan purges of agencies, corporate multinationals capturing government agencies, and all sorts of naked corruption.

Trumpism isn’t new, it’s just poorly marketed. The biggest difference between Trump and his predecessors is that the media clapped like seals when prior admins were committing these atrocities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
2 points
*

How can they? There is little news left. Just propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

2/10 Say he’s average. 3/10 think he’s great!

1/10?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Probably something like:

4.3 terrible

2.4 average

3.3 great

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“don’t know” it’s right there in the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

It’s a bullshit poll. 10% selected “I don’t know.”

The AP-NORC poll surveyed 1,260 adults from April 17- April 21, using a probability-based method from AmeriSpeak. The margin of sampling error for the poll is plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

He’s underwater at 54.6% unfavorable on YouGov as of five days ago.

https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/trackers/donald-trump-favorability

He’s 59% unfavorable on Pew Research Center as of three days ago.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/04/23/evaluations-of-trump-job-approval-and-confidence-on-issues/

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, these numbers are still crazy low relatively speaking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

They’re the lowest in presidential history 70 years. Don’t forget, they’re not exclusively asking informed people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The 52% AP-NORC result has a margin of error of 3.9%. That puts the 54.6% YouGov poll squarely within it. Pew Research was April 7-14 and doesn’t have a margin on its first page, so I didn’t look further.

Not sure why you don’t think the YouGov poll is also bullshit since it is lower than Pew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fair point. They both typically use smaller sample sizes than Pew or Reuters/Ipsos as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yougov is a private company based out of England and founded by rich right wingers. They exist to profit from and meddle in American politics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They were probably afraid to speak for fear or being deported

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s because we’re literally surrounded by nazis

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I misread it as 4/10 say he’s good, and still thought WTF?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sooo… Wait…

“4 in 10 Americans say Trump has been a ‘terrible’ leader in his second term.
2 in 10 think he has done an average job
3 in 10 says he’s been a great or good president.”

4+2+3 = 9…

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Rounding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They left out 1 in 10 for “Poor.” I also didn’t find a link to the poll in the article. Here’s the poll:

https://apnorc.org/projects/100-days-in-and-the-public-feels-trumps-presidency-is-proceeding-mostly-as-expected/

Great/Good NET 31

  • Great 18
  • Good 13

Average 16

Poor/Terrible NET 52

  • Poor 13
  • Terrible 39

DON’T KNOW -

SKIPPED/REFUSED 1

N= 1,260

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Not the biggest sample size.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Presumably rounding, or 1 in 10 thinks he’s just done a bad job.

“There are 3 types of people: those who can count, and those who cannot”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

1 in 10: Not sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

who is the president again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It was 1 in 100 skipped. 1 in 10 was poor. Poor / Terrible is 52%

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

30% of the population thinks tanking the economy, shredding the constitution, and deporting people to what is essentially a death camp without due process, all totally legal and very cool.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Deporting. Disappearing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I got downvoted on another post for stating that disappearing is a term used for events when what happened to the victims isn’t public knowledge. We know who was deported illegally (without due process) to El Salvador.

Disappearing is when a person suddenly vanishes and it sometimes takes a Truth and Reconciliation effort a decade later to figure out where they were buried.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sure, sure. It’s not disappearing someone if they eventually list their names or let them make phone calls, days, weeks, or months later, it’s just sparkling secret deportations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just because they’re doing it sloppily doesn’t mean it’s not disappearing.

Or maybe we should wait a decade before we refer to it as what it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Reminds me of this book about interviews with “ordinary” non-political, non-military Nazi party members in Germany. Just regular citizens with jobs and families. “They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45” (1955).

“The author determined that his interviewees had fond memories of the Nazi period and did not see Adolf Hitler as evil, and they perceived themselves as having a high degree of personal freedom during Nazi rule, with the exception of the teacher. Additionally, barring said teacher, the subjects still disliked Jewish people… At the time of the interviews the interviewees were still not in favor of the democratic Bonn government.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_Thought_They_Were_Free

Excerpt from the book: https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/511928.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Sample size was 10 men… The author didnt even speak german

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not a poll. It’s a book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He’s getting a masterclass in negotiation from Xi and I’m here for it.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 322K

    Comments