The White House has begun the process of looking for a new secretary of defense, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly.

This comes as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth continues to find himself mired in controversy. NPR has also confirmed with the same official that Hegseth shared details ahead of last month’s Yemen strikes with his wife and brother in a Signal chat on his personal phone, minutes after being updated by a senior U.S. military official. The news of the second Signal group chat about the mission was first reported by The New York Times.

In March, Hegseth shared details about action against Houthi targets in Yemen in a Signal chat with top White House officials that accidentally included a journalist.

176 points

If only there had been signs that he was dangerously under qualified.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

On the upside … any of us are qualified for the job and have a higher chance now of achieving that position than at any time in the past … and I’m not even American!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

The fact that you aren’t American is probably a plus. Are you Russian by chance? That would probably put you at the top of the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Was just gonna say if yer Russian, yer a shoe-in!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And he got confirmed. Fucking twats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

NPR exclusive. Chef’s kiss

permalink
report
reply
7 points

There is a wonderful schadenfreude to NPR breaking this! We should all go donate money in Pete’s name!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

But somehow they can’t find a single dead palestinian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

My only concern is will they find somebody worse?

permalink
report
reply
36 points

How much lower can you go than an unqualified drunken Fox News host? What baffles me is this man was approved by Congress. Anyone who OK’ed this turd is also unqualified!

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Alex Jones or Joe Rogan

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They can’t do that job and make their podcast money. No way they drop their cash cow for a couple of years behind the Fanta Facist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Never assume Trump can’t go lower.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

“Hold my beer.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s all been drank by Hegseth and Kavanaugh though

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hear Zapp Brannagin is available

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The dominoes will fall like a house of cards.

Checkmate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He may go for DeSantia, who would be a more effective person to purge the Defense Department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

3 months in. That’s like 9 mooches.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

We’re really starting to develop a system to measure time here. 9 Mooches to a Hegseth

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

anything but metric

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Blame France for not pushing harder for metric time. It’s absolutely rational and perfect in every way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s too rational

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh god, you’ve inspired me to do some unit conversions.

1 Light-Mooch is 1904.591 AU. Not as much fun as I was hoping.

Maybe there are some fun coincidences with other things

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I still got a chuckle out of it. Thanks, mate 🍻

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

During his first term, Trump dismissed both of his Secretaries of Defense:

  • Trump’s first Secretary of Defense, Jim Mattis — who was generally regarded as a strong pick for the office — was dismissed after he announced that he would resign over a decision Trump was making.

    On December 19, 2018, Trump announced immediate US withdrawal from Syria, over his national security advisers’ objections.[133] Mattis had recently said that the US would remain in Syria after ISIL’s defeat to ensure it did not regroup. The next day, he submitted his resignation after failing to persuade Trump to reconsider.[134][135] His resignation letter contained language that appeared to criticize Trump’s worldview—praising NATO, which Trump has often derided, and the 79-nation anti-ISIS coalition that Trump had decided to leave. Mattis also affirmed the need for “treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors” and remaining “resolute and unambiguous” against authoritarian states such as China and Russia. He wrote that Trump has “the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with [his] on these and other subjects.”[136][137] His resignation triggered alarm among historical allies.[138] In his 2018 resignation letter, Mattis called both Russia and China “authoritarian models” rivaling US interests.[139] Mattis’s letter said his resignation would be effective February 28, 2019.[140] Three days later Trump moved Mattis’s departure date up to January 1, after becoming angered by the implicit criticism of Trump’s worldview in Mattis’s letter.[141] On January 2, 2019, Trump criticized Mattis’s performance as secretary of defense and said he had “essentially fired him.”[142]

  • Trump’s replacement, Mark Esper, was fired via Trump tweeting:

    After Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden, Trump launched a months-long effort to challenge the election outcome and remain in power, claiming that the election had been “stolen” from him.[284] In his subsequent memoir, published in 2022, Esper wrote that Trump’s effort “was a national embarrassment that undermined our democracy, our credibility, and our leadership on the world stage.”[284]

    On November 9, 2020, days after his election loss, Trump tweeted that Esper was “terminated,” and that he had been replaced by Christopher C. Miller, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center who would serve as Acting Secretary of Defense.[285] Esper had written his resignation letter four days earlier, when a winner had not yet been determined.[286]

    On January 2, 2021, days before the end of Trump’s term and the inauguration of Biden, Esper, along with all other living former secretaries of defense, published a Washington Post op-ed piece in January 2021 that rebuked Trump’s effort to alter the election results, and said there was no role for the military to change them. The group’s piece appeared days after Trump ally Michael Flynn, an ex-Army general, and reportedly Trump himself, discussed the possibility of declaring martial law and attempting to stay in power. The group wrote: “Our elections have occurred. Recounts and audits have been conducted. Appropriate challenges have been addressed by the courts. Governors have certified the results. And the electoral college has voted. The time for questioning the results has passed; the time for the formal counting of the electoral college votes, as prescribed in the Constitution and statute, has arrived.”[287] Esper later wrote that Trump’s behavior on January 6, when a mob of his supporters, incited by the president, attacked the Capitol and disrupted the counting of the electoral votes, “threatens our democracy.”[288]

That being said, in both cases, it sounds like it was due to them disagreeing with him. As far as I know, Hegseth has not gotten into a major disagreement with Trump.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

you nailed the difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 323K

    Comments