46 points
*

She already had an event planned in Indiana today… One that was scheduled before Bibi said he was coming.

And isn’t she meeting with him personally as soon as she gets back?

Anyone will be less supportive than Joe. But she still takes AIPAC money too.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Yes, everything you said is 100% true. But hopefully this is the first of many future departures on her part from the prior administration’s coziness with Bibi’s regime and war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think she’ll end up governing like Obama.

Lots of progressive talk and it’ll sound amazing, but not really accomplish enough.

Which I mean, it’s the best we had since Obama… We just have to be loud early that we get a real competitive primary next year. Not some bullshit where no one runs or everyone drops 24hr before Super Tuesday and endorses the party favorite.

Historically for Dems we get the best turnout after competitive primaries. And the worst when voters feel they have no say in it.

We need to look at the primary as an advertisement for the eventual candidate. That’s the whole point, getting out there and selling your plans to the people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Obama tried to accomplish a lot of progressive stuff, but Congress held him back from a lot of what he really wanted to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

"The purpose of having Netanyahu address Congress is to bolster his political standing in Israel and to quell international opposition to his war. I don’t feel like being a prop so I won’t be attending.”

— Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), on X.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Terrible person accidentally correct, more at 11

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Thomas Massie is the only Republican that has been consistently based when it comes to israel.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/12/06/congress/massie-zionism-patriotism-house-israel-00130383

Massie voted against a resolution the House passed last week that affirmed Israel’s right to exist, citing language in the resolution that he said equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

Still awful on many other subjects but surprisingly better than almost all of congress when it comes to not being a Genocide puppet so give the man credit where it’s due.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is like Gorsuch and indigenous tribes issues… or like learning a serial killer genuinely cared for puppies and founded an animal shelter

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Sorry I’m super tired and this title is fucking with me…. ‘Shows daylight with Biden’ what? What does that mean?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I think “showing daylight” is a metaphor for there being space between two things or ideas. So in a sense her and Biden’s views on Israel are not conjoined, hence “daylight” can be seen between them, like slats in a fence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This makes sense thanks for the explanation 🙏 - also realised that the phrasing of the headline tripped me up. It says Harris shows daylight ‘with’ Biden which i think is completely the wrong word to use there, but i suppose they had written themselves into a corner by insisting on starting the sentence with ‘Harris’

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
11 points

I feel like they’ve butchered it as well - surely this phrase needs to take the form of ‘daylight’ (or not) between x and y? Use of ‘with’ tripped me up - daylight with Biden? I guess they meant that Harris skipping the address ‘showed daylight’ between her and Biden on this issue, but i would give them an F for phrasing tbh. Complete trainwreck if you ask me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s not necessarily “wrong” the way they said it, but headlines can often have some tortured grammar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Difference of opinion - like some space between them

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

gotta click the article and read it lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah i read the article and understood what happened, still don’t understand the headline tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

For no reason at all, I’m posting the fact that you can also click the “don’t be a dick” button…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

wheres that button? lol. all I did was say to read the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments