Fancy cupcakes are 70% icing, really not that nice and a waste of money

99 points
*

All billionaires are evil people that decide to accumulate wealth instead of distributing the surplus and living off enough to not have to worry about the future. All. Of. Them.

Yes, even Taylor Swift and Gabe Newell. They have enough money that they could set 100m aside, live off that and charge break-even prices for their products so more people could enjoy them or they could charge the same thing and redirect their share of the profits into charities, they choose not to.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I’m a Taylor Swift fan (not a Swifty) but I’m 100% with you.

I pirate her music (tbf all music). I’ve gotten into heated arguments on Lemmy on how she’s one of the “good” ones.

No such thing as a good billionaire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

All the people who work at the venues could be paid lots more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She became a billionaire by selling tickets for more than necessary and makes the choice to continue doing so to enrich herself.

As I said, there’s no reason she couldn’t have started doing shows that only broke even once she had enough money to live off of for the rest of her life, she decides not to do that and she decides to continue accumulating wealth we can’t even imagine.

Remember when Musk said if he could prevent famine for 6B he would do it, he was presented with a plan and didn’t do it? All billionaires are guilty of doing the same thing and the way they accumulate the means to do that is by selling us things for more than they’re actually worth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My completely unbiased exception is LeBron.

“Ain’t no party like a Diddy party”

So wholesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

wait what, shes a THOUSAND MILLIONS DEEP ???"2? wtf thats stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You also HAVE to exploit people in order to get there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Isn’t Gabe’s net worth literally just the value of Valve? In order to cash his money out, he’d have to sell Valve.

I don’t want him to sell Valve. I like him being in charge of Valve, he’s doing a decent job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

He’s got a yacht collection, six of them, costing him more to maintain a year than you and your children will ever be worth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

you and your children entire neighborhoods

Boycott Steam and support GOG and itch.io!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Buy, Borrow, Die. Rich people don’t sell shares. They take very low interest loans banks are more than happy to lend them. Use their shares as collateral. Then pay no taxes and only a small amount of interest. They do this forever until they die.

It’s why everything is associated with “make number go up”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree and it’s pretty obvious if you think about it for a short while.

Even religions know this, it’s just a simple fact of life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You are completely correct. There are so many exits before becoming a billionaire that any normal person would take.

Once you have millions you can live comfortable. Tens of millions and you’re set for life, you can live in luxury without ever doing another day’s work.

Hundreds of millions and you can buy anything you ever want or need. The only reason to continue accumulating money is because you get some fucked up pleasure from it.

You can claim you “earned it” through “working hard” but it’s a pathetic assertion. The simple fact is money is only gained at the expense of others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

We should be using soap and water after popping, toilet paper alone is barbaric

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Bum gun or Bidet. The humane way to toilet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have yet to experience one but bidets seem like the dream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you ever make your own bathroom or get your choice in the matter, go full french: get the separate porcelain fixture that has separate hot and cold valves, with the soap and towel.

I have a Toto seat and, while it’s nice, the stream is small, leaking potential poo water down your legs onto the inner edges of the seat is… (It doesn’t seem to happen, but still), and the internal warm water tank is small.

I used my ex’s much cheaper one a bunch when we were dating, and his was cold only but like a garden hose flow rate. It was so fucking fast and felt so much nicer. But didn’t oscillate, have aim, pressure, heated seat, dryer, or any of that stuff…

Plus, without the soap, I don’t really want to use a towel to dry my bits off.

So ideally, it would be temperature adjustable, PORCELAIN AND NOT PLASTIC, high flow/adjustable, be an actual bidet where you can fit your hands down there to wash yourself with soap and water, and then have a designated towel so that you eliminate more if not all tp usage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s very cheap options if you want to feel clean

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re are cheap bidets out there, and the are premium ones. The premium ones (like toto) are worth it, but I’d start with an inexpensive one to see if you enjoy it first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Tf is a bum gun

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s exactly what it sounds like in this context. Think of a garden hose attachment with a trigger. You point it at the right spot, pull the trigger, and wash your bum clean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You just gave me a really good idea for a portable bidet actually. I normally use a little squeeze lotion bottle but it doesn’t have the required water power… Now I gotta find some of those tiny water guns we used to have as kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hard agree. Bidet + soap is the most hygienic way. I was actually surprised to learn that even some bidet users don’t use soap and literally just blast their ass and hope it washes away everything. You’re already halfway there, might as well use soap and be completely clean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh no, I’m not washing my ass with soap every time, but I commend you for commitment to the cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ikr, bidet yes, I don’t have one but I have used one and its better. Soap though sounds like a way to have a really dry butt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I sort of agree, but I also poop 5times a day. That would take up a lot of my time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Have you checked with a doctor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep, I’ve always been like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That doesn’t sound healthy

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I do several rounds as well and I can tell you washing with soap and water using a bidet is much milder than wiping yourself raw with toilet paper. Washing once per round also takes the same amount of time as wiping several times until you feel “clean”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

… I don’t think that’s normal bud

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would it? Paper is nice and dry but washing your ass at the bathroom sink and towel drying is faster in my experience. It’s just more of a hassle, but it does feel a lot cleaner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Colitis Ulcerosa? My sympathies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No idea if it’s barbaric but it certainly is not as clean as it should be. At least, I think so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Had a bidet. Had to get rid of it.

The toddler thought it was hilarious.

permalink
report
parent
reply

American cakes, cookies, and breads have waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much sugar. (Eating American white bread hurts my teeth.)

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Had my boss bring over twinkies from the states because I was curious. Holy moly that stuff is sweet, it’s like distilled sugar or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Most people in the States don’t like Twinkies either, I’ve got no clue who is buying them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Omg I totally agree. I went to America a few years ago and the bread was so sugary

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t eat American white bread either, most other Americans I know eat sourdough or ‘actual’ bread, not that weird loaf of angel food cake they call bread here lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

And yet “Wonder” Bread still sells in huge amounts. Someone is eating it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Its not just baked goods, we put sugar/corn syrup in everything! sausages don’t need to be sweetened! Vegetables don’t need to be sweetened!

And then we add excessive amounts of salt to counterbalance the sweetness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s not just the baked products either!

I just bought some lemon pepper seasoning.

Now you’d t think that the top ingredient would be either lemon, pepper, or salt right?

Well uh, no. It’s sugar for some reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

As an American, yes they do and it sucks. Especially since I’m trying to lower my sugar consumption due to my family history of type 2 diabetes

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

I’m so out of shape right now, it’ll probably be whichever one I try to climb next.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

💀

this is some real /r/suicidebywords material right here

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You mean */c/suicidebywords

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

does that community exist here, or is this just wishful thinking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

I posted a comment on Reddit telling about how the word racism really means a person who is a subscriber to the pseudoscience that is race.

Tons of people downvoted me then reddit admins removed the content for harassment, of all things. (None of it made sense to me)

I’m sad that people still think that people are different races, and to not be racist you just have to not put one over or under another, when the crux of the problem is fundamentally that people don’t get that race was made up because long ago dumb people thought that people that looked different were a literal different species but couldn’t prove it so made up the word race as a subcategory in the taxonomic system, but finally scientists realized it’s complete bullshit since it’s impossible to define, total bullshit, wildly inconsistent, and massively harmful… and I’m sad that people there literally couldn’t comprehend that, and got so mad or offended that they censured the information and thought I was arguing against the existence of systemic racism or something that only a dumb piece of shit would misinterpret.

I linked the Wikipedia page for racism which explains all of it, including history and stuff.

I was triggered for like a week trying to figure out what I said wrong, and honestly still kinda bothered.

But, that is what race is: a bigoted idea that different people are different races and shouldn’t/can’t interbreed. And that’s the stupidest bullshit that MOST people don’t understand, and I’ll die on this hill, explaining that we gotta stop all being racists. Yeah, fix the problems like systemic racism, but stop thinking of people with darker or lighter skin as different - they’re just warm weather humans or cold weather humans, the same way buff or skinny humans are. Fuck. We’re all literally just humans, an amazing species, capable of adaptation and survival.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I think you’re right, but imo the disagreement i feels like really stem from the way you put it, as you talk about race in a biological science while they think you’re talking about ethnicity(social science?), and then there’s this odd fixation with no compromise which kinda what caused the friction, even though i think both party might agree with each other.

Also reddit and online forum is mostly made up of weird people so idk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)

Read the introduction. It’s complicated but mostly race is arbitrary. But that’s the whole discussion I want to bring to people for awareness of concept and language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Man… I got banned from a kink community sub because I edited my comment with a automagical editor…

It replaced my text with gobbledygook and then was going to delete it…

The mod came across the text said something to the extent of “this makes no sense” and banned me under their “because we can” rule.

I sent the mod a message with links and an explanation… he came back with your original post is gone. So you are too.

My reddit account is 14 years old…

It bothered me for a while too… and still dones I guess since I’m here talking about it… but honestly mods are gonna mod… they are small people with a smidge of “power” you could have said hope “you folks have a great day!!” And gotten banned.

It happens. Sucks tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah I’m stopping using Reddit because of how fascist things are now around the world, in hopes of keeping access to my similarly old account because there may be a lot of porn on there, but there’s also a ton of good resources and important things.

Maybe if things turn around in a few years, I’ll consider resume using reddit. But the more-intelligent-than-a-rock part of me knows otherwise.

Too many people getting banned for fascist and sketchy reasons. So instead of participate there, it’s now just an archive to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You are absolutely correct: “race” is a social construct that is created along artificial lines (pigment, facial features, etc).

The truth is that we share ~99.9% of our DNA with every other person, a gene pool so small that there is more diversity between troops of Chimpanzees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve been thinking like that for a long time but recently I’ve been thinking about it in terms of internalized opposition. One of the most pernicious elements of the fight against stupid and bad ideologies is when their framings gain dominance even in the minds of their opponents.

At some point, someone said ‘black people are blah, white people are bleh,’ and the person next to them probably said ‘What do you mean black people?’ because the concept was new but the ideology of race turned into such a common one that people who were oppressed by it were forced to consider what the powerful thought about it, like an atheist prisoner being forced to think about how to convince a Christian jailer to be less awful to them. They internalized it. And now even people who are ‘anti-racist’ often treat ‘blackness’ and ‘whiteness’ as if they were real, and not just conceptually different in the same way you can live in a different country without moving because the lines on a map change. Even as they battle the concept, they try to do it from within the system, prisoners demanding to be free without acknowledging the world outside the prison walls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

We are all different, I don’t know how you can deny that. And some differences can depend on where your ancestors are from.

If it’s not “race” then is there another way of describing it?

In animals we call it breeds. Sounds weird.

I think as an advanced species we should be capable of ascending beyond the descriminating behaviour based on origin. I know it’s possible as I can. Seeing other people first reactions to meeting people get described with race undertones is alien to me and feels disrespectful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Well the problem with trying to subdivide humans is that

A) it’s actually really really hard to do, so hard in fact that it’s impossible and is a pseudoscience B) it basically always results in comparison. Which gets bad REALLY quickly because suddenly there is a better or worse, an inferior and superior.

I’m not saying we aren’t different, I’m not saying that.

But, as far as species, we ARE all the same. You, your sister, your neighbor, your great great great grandfather. We all have our differences and generic differences, but they’re infinitesimally small, we are just VERY good at telling the differences because we’re so used to staring at the same face over and over.

There’s just so much crossover and mixing and volatility. People can change from one to the other or halfway and stuff, there’s no clarity. Like, me, for example: I’m a mix that people look at me and get very wrong 95% of the time. And then if I have kids with somebody that doesn’t have the exact same mixed heritage with me, it’s like… Wtf do you even call me?

And then if you learn some anthropology and learn that long thin limbs and people are from hot climates close to the equator, and short ratioed people are from further (surface area to mass ratio, keeping warmth) away from the equator where it’s cold.

Like… You can be vague and descriptive a little about it, but when you realize that reality is just that we’re all the same species, with no limits to interbreeding, it makes so much more sense.

Let’s say you take a pale-ass white guy and strand them near the equator for ten years outdoors. Does that guy suddenly become a different breed or race or whatever you want to call it? No… it’s the same person, the same species, even if he looks different - he just adapted and his body is like “holy fuck it’s hot and I’m trying my best to not get skin cancer and the right amount of vitamins from the sun”.

And same thing for brown skinned people (let’s just say Mexican natives). You take a young couple with darker brown skin, and move them to norway or somewhere cold with VERY little sun (latitude). They are going to lose melatonin in their skin and become paler. Let’s say they have kids and you inbreed them for a few generations. They will get progressively more pale, and start to look more adapted to the region, likely even take on regional issues.

And the reason why is because we’re all the same type of monkey. (Not actually monkey because that’s a different offshoot, but primate; we’re great apes!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mostly agree with you. And I commend your principles.

Some of your examples need improving is all I’ll say.

Like sending a white guy to the equator for a decade. Okay fine, they go dark skinned. But bring him back up north and he is white again. Send a super dark skinned guy far north and he will get somewhat paler, so it works both ways. But they retain that difference because they are different.

We have developed differences mostly based on our origin in the world, be it Asian, African, Egyptian, Indian, etc, but we are such an internationally mixed people the differences are meaningless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah humans are actually all pretty close genetically compared to other species. And “race” as defined by society isn’t even a good predictor of genetic similarities, so for example if you take random people A and B who are black, and person C who is white, B and C will often be more closely related than A and B.

Also as a sidenote, we are monkeys. Apes are now considered to be a type of monkey taxonomically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’ve never had infants around other infants.

We all have the same child. They all act the same behavior is the same… Patterns are the same Etc…

Humans don’t really start to develop in different directions and speed until they are like 18 months old.

Our coloring and physical features might not be the same… but the basic operating system and internals are all the same across humanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yes I agree, this is human. Just the same as all dogs wag their tail and bark. Like other posters have said, the differences are subtle and we are all more the same than different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Breeds are defined by organizations that determine breed based on lineage, followed by conformation. They do not align across different countries. Dogs have the AKC, CKC in America. They don’t follow the same definitions. It also causes lots of issues to classify things like this and leads to bad decision making by lots of people. Even as it is now, there’s no clear definition for things like Pit Bulls. There’s also a ton of health issues that arise from defining breeds and trying to follow this logic.

Humans are not controlled and bred based on these things so a Breed Standard would not be possible. There is simply a continuous line of people.

Perform a cluster analysis on dogs - they will kind of fall into clusters because we bred selectively for them. But humans, which have not been selectively bred even in smaller geographic regions, would not provide decent clustering results based on race categories.

Without good clustering, whatever groups you make have more inaccuracies than accuracies in your grouped statements. (Border collies are high energy, greyhounds are lazy > 65% true at best) this is because of the insane complexity of DNA and the lack of selective breeding artificially limiting the DNA diversity. Plus other stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

redditors

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t see what your original comment was, so missing a lot of context here.

I agree with what you said, but race as a biological thing is not how most people think of it. Most people interpret race in the context of skin color and ethnic groups, i.e. in a sociological context, and within that context it makes absolutely no sense to claim that race does not exist. It would be nice if it didn’t exist, but that’s not where we are right now as a society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If you’re smart enough to know all that, you’re smart enough to know that being suspicious of differences is how our species survived, and we’re not going to evolve out of it anytime soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 880

    Posts

  • 19K

    Comments