Donald Trump and White House officials walked back a Friday announcement that there would be tariff exemptions on imported electronics.

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump directly denied the tariff exemption announcement.

“This is really mind-boggling. If this was serious industrial policy, the main thing you want is certainty: ‘Here’s the tariff, it will be in place for the indefinite future, and you should plan accordingly,’” Dean Baker, an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-leaning think tank, said, according to The Washington Post. “Here, it’s basically: ‘Come back next week and see what we’ve got.’ That’s no way to run an economy.”

33 points
*

This isn’t even a subtle attempt to destabilize the world market, and yet so many people are just like

permalink
report
reply
3 points

You imply that this is done with intent?

The first part, sure: show them the stick, then dangle the carrot. But the walkback of the excemption was intentional?

I don’t think so. It’s all just blatant extortion attempts followed by bumbling cluelessness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think it’s time we stop assuming this is just simply stupidity. He’s an entertainer who’s made his public career by being a meme while at the same time being a conman. He’s been effectively toeing the line between joke and conman for decades and knows that if he plays dumb and schmoozes enough, he can do whatever he wants. We’re talking about a guy who successfully turned “You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy.” into “it’s just locker talk between guys.” a close relationship with a known human trafficker and pedofile into “he’s a terrific guy,” and proceeded to walk away from a rape case and 34 felony convictions with no penalty.

Time and time again he’s shown exactly the kind of guy he really is, and it isn’t just a bumbling idiot. It’s a career criminal who knows exactly what he’s doing and how to be smooth enough to get away scot-free. Why would this be any different? Just because it’s on a grand scale?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I see it more differentiated. He is not a complete idiot. He (and his team) know what they’re doing when he makes outrageous claims about Greenland, China, Panama etc. to have a better position when he offers the country “a good deal”. But when that rather predictable stratagem doesn’t go as planned, they flounder.
We’ve seen it a few times now; at least to me there’s a clear difference between their regular “throwing shit at the wall” tactic, and something like this or Signalgate or JD’s recent visit to Greenland, when it’s just totally clear that things did not go as planned.

There’s no 4D chess here.
I don’t think it’s their intent to destabilize the world market (to what end?), just a simple “grab as much as possible for ourselves the USA”.

Putin doesn’t plan so meticulously either, he just backs the guy who’s most likely to destabilize “The West” through his sheer cleptocracy and partial idiocy, if you will.

Also I don’t think anyone’s reaction here is “surprised pikachu” - though I must admit he and his entourage still manage to out-outrage themselves every now and then. And I reserve the right to not normalize Trumplon, i.e. continue to be outraged by it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It’s almost like your laws had a very good reason for a very long time to disallow the president the power to unilaterally impose tariffs.

Hell, to unilaterally do MOST things.

permalink
report
reply
95 points

I’m not surprised that this is how the second Trump administration has started. This level of stupidity is exactly what I was expecting. What does surprise me, though, is that many tens of millions of people voted for this. Honestly, it’s shaken my commitment to democracy. Maybe the people shouldn’t be making important decisions.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

💯 this is a if not THE shining example of why certain people should simply not be allowed to vote. It’s like the poster child for why we SHOULD have the Electoral College, but with electors who put country over party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The US was never a democracy to begin with. It was a government designed to benefit one very particular small but powerful minority.

It’s just that now it’s come out of the closet.

It’s strange that it would happen now, at a point when literally every job can be automated(or will be automatable within the next 5-10 years).

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

…stupidity? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

They’re intentionally crashing the economy so they and all their billionaire buddies can buy everything up for cheap. Everything is going literally exactly as planned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

this “plan” assumes recovery

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I was one to agree with you for a time, but at this point I’m not even sure what the plan could actually be, US treasury bonds are taking a big hit because of this shit and the global economic order is shifting to exclude the US and could even endanger the dollar as the world reserve currency. That’s a change so seismic no one could even predict what it would mean for anyone. If that’s his intention then whoever came up with the plan is stupid beyond all imagining

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I won’t go russian to judgement or putin the blame on anyone, but some people that love to sow chaos and take down the US do come to mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If that’s his intention then whoever came up with the plan is stupid beyond all imagining

Ding ding ding!

Their plan literally involves devaluing the dollar. They don’t want the dollar as the global reserve currency. They have no idea how it’ll all actually shake out but they’re confident that they’ll end up proportionately richer than everyone else. Sure the absolute amount of their wealth might decrease, but the real amount relative to the “serfs” will skyrocket.

They basically want their own little technofeudalist fiefdoms where everyone unfortunate enough to live in them is basically their property.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think that’s it, and they victimize LGBTQ+ people and immigrants because their supporters love it and it buys them time to implement their kleptocracy. Some of the Trump people are true-believer Nazis, but some of them are just greedy assholes who will throw anyone under the bus for their own gain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well, cutting all the education budget and expecting a good rational voting from a bunch of uneducated people is a lunacy.

Also, it is well known that democracy is not optimal, but we don’t have anything better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Democracy is the power of the majority. Now think of how stupid the avarage person is and realize half of them is stupider than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

How about education should never be touched when it comes to budgets?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I don’t think that what K-to-12 schools are capable of teaching even in the best-case scenario can be sufficient to equip the average person with the knowledge and critical thinking skills necessary to, for example, evaluate complex economic policy on its merits. I have a STEM PhD but it isn’t in economics and I don’t think I can evaluate economic policy well - I go with the consensus of economists, but that’s easy for me because I think their best interests and mine are aligned. (I want to see the stock market go up.) I’m not sure what a person whose interests are not aligned with the economists’ is supposed to do… Listen to ignorant demagogues who promise everything, apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I think that’s a good idea, but, unfortunately, if put to a vote, I’m confident the American people would vote against it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

People are fucking stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No take decrease only throw increase

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Before the election, I saw a house flying a big flag with the words “Elect Trump King of the United States”. So, uh, maybe monarchy would turn out to be even worse…

With that said, I understand how you feel. I don’t know how democracy can work in a post-truth era.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Y’know, if America had a constitutional monarchy, it might actually work out just fine. Let Trump be the king, so he can rant, do ceremonial stuff, be in the news all the time, have his fans, cause controversies, &c.… meanwhile the real elected government would be quietly busy attending to the people’s business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What surprises me is that tens of millions still think he’s doing the right thing even as he makes the country look like fools.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

The AP source title is: Trump’s commerce secretary says new electronics tariff exemptions are temporary, chip tariffs coming

The part that’s been denied is that the exclusion is permanent. Since Friday, electronics from China would be subject to 20% of the fentanyl tariff and nothing more. It will be this way until Trump invents another tariff just for electronics. I believe this is what most commentators expected back in Friday, but there must be talks of capitulation and Trump couldn’t stand to lose face.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Crazy that someone checked the facts and shares about it and 3 hours later only has 5 upvotes including the one I just gave. Thank you. Maybe next time you should begin your comment with # HERE IS THE CONTEXT GUYS!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

The USA is definitely a joke now. It’s just that everyone is laughing nervously. We are afraid that falling so fast from top to bottom will bring the system down.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Which system? The US political system? That one is damaged beyond repair and needs to be reworked completely. The global economic system? That one is also damaged beyond repair, but the rework will create a lot of instability and most likely war.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes I was thinking about the global economic system. And like you pointed out, I’m worried that the rework (on top of being ugly) might end up in a worse situation (in terms of inequality, freedom etc…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m worried that total economic collapse would only consolidate power and not distribute it. I’m not versed in history so I could be wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Its a concept of a plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments